European Court on Human Rights, Decision as to the Admissibility of Application nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04 by S. and Michael Marper against the United Kingdom, 16.1.2007.
Garland D. (2001). The Culture of Crime Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gesetz zur Novellierung der forensischen DNA-Analyse vom 12. August 2005.
Gross S.R. et al. (2005). Exonerations in the United States 1989 through 2003, „Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology”, No. 95.
Haas C., Voegeli P., Kratzer A., Bär W. (2006). Die Schweizerische DNA-Datenbank. Rückblick auf sechs erfolgreiche Jahre, „Kriminalistik”, vol. 60.
Human Genetics Commission (2005). Profiling the Newborn: A Prospective Gene Technology? A Report from a Joint Working Group of the Human Genetics Commission and the UK National Screening Committee. London.
Hutchings B., Mednick S.A. (1977). Criminality in Adoptees and Their Adoptive and Biological Parents: A Pilot Study [in:] S.A. Mednick, K.O. Christiansen (eds.), Biosocial Bases of Criminal Behavior. New York: Gardner Press.
Innocence Project, Facts on Post-Conviction DNA Exonerations, www.innocenceproject.org/Content/351.php.
Johnson P., Williams R. (2007). Internationalizing New Technologies of Crime Control: Forensic DNA Databasing and Datasharing in the European Union, „Policing and Society”, No. 17.
Leary D., Pease K. (2003). DNA and the Active Criminal Population, „Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal”, No. 5 (1).
Levine H.G. (2007). Hearings of New York State Assembly Committees on Codes and on Corrections Regarding Pending and Proposed Legislation to Collect DNA from All People Convicted of a Misdemeanor in New York State and also Regarding New York City’s Epidemic of Marijuana Possession Arrests. Albany, New York.
Marx G.T. (2003). Some Information Age Techno-Fallacies, „Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management”, No. 11.
McCartney C. (2006). The DNA Expansion Programme and Criminal Investigation, „British Journal of Criminology”, No. 46.
Mellon J.N. (2001). Manufacturing Convictions: Why Defendants Are Entitled to The Data Underlying Forensic DNA Kits, „Duke Law Journal”, No. 51.
Ministry of Justice (2006). The Dutch DNA Testing (Convicted Persons) Act. Den Haag.
Nederlands Forensisch Instituut (2007). Jaarverslag 2006 van de Nederlandse DNA-databank voor strafzaken. Den Haag.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2007), The Forensic Use of Bioinformation: Ethical Issues. London.
Recommendation Rec (2002)5 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the protection of women against violence.
Roach J., Pease K. (2006). DNA Evidence and Police Investigations: A Health Warning, „Police Professional”, vol. 2.
Samuels J.E., Asplen C. (2000). The Future of Forensic DNA Testing: Predictions of the Research and Development Working Group. Washington.
Schneider P.M., Martin P.D. (2001). Criminal DNA Databases: The European Situation, „Forensic Science International”, No. 119.
Schuller W. (2005). Interpol/DNA-Datenbank. Internationale Kooperation, „Der Kriminalist”.
Simpson Trial Shows Need for Proper Use of Forensic Science, Experts Say (1995), „The New York Times”, 11 October.
Spiegel Online, 19 July 2004.
Stern, 2 February 2005.
The Forensic Science Service (2005). Annual Report 2004−2005. London.
The Forensic Science Service 2005.
The National DNA Data Bank of Canada (2007). Annual Report 2005−2006. Ottawa.
Tutton R., Oonagh C. (eds.) (2004). Genetic Databases: Socio-Ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA. London: Routledge.