Gilson - voudrait-il deconstruire la metaphysique?

• Authors: Nicolas Moscicki

Title variants

PL

Czy Gilson chciał dekonstruować metafizykę?

Abstracts

EN

This presentation - following, as closely as possible, the book of Pierre Aubenque “Do we have/need to deconstruct the metaphysics? / Faut’il déconstruire la métaphysique?” (PUF Paris 2009) - will be focused just on Gilson’s doctrine: on some, « in a sense, deconstructing approaches » which, according to Aubenque, Gilson (as a metaphysician and as an historian of metaphysics, knowingly or not…) put in fact in practice… The « sense of deconstructing approaches » in question (let us say: the « what-why-when-which way… in singular or in plural, of the practiced deconstruction ») will not be fixed-made explicit at the beginning, but, step by step, will become more and more clear all along the study… Inevitably, the screening of deconstruction practiced here, will put in evidence « its reverse side » - namely, what, within metaphysics, is - can (must?) be - a matter for « construction »… During his screening, Aubenque approaches Gilson on the background of continuous confrontation with Heidegger, punctual confrontation with Bergson; and, in some proximity with Descartes and Kant (tacit-unspoken and what’s more, a bit undecided between them both)… The presentation will finish-culminate with/in a series of global-essential conclusions: Aubenque’s conclusions, related to Gilson, to Heidegger, to convergences-divergences between them; and mines, related to his (especially, to the limitations-confusions-discrepancies… in his own approach) …

Keywords

PL

(De)konstrukcja [metafizyki]; Historyczność [metafizyki]; Historialność [bytu - ens/esse]; Poznanie [bytu - ens/esse]; Przedmiot [metafizyki]; Zapomnienie [bytu - esse]

FR

Connaissance-événement [de l’étant-être]; (De)construction [de la métaphysique]; Historicité [de la métaphysique]; Historialité [de l’étant-être]; Objet [de la métaphysique]; Oubli-retrait [de l’être]

• Publisher: Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
• Journal: Rocznik Tomistyczny
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 7
• Pages: 79-104

Dates

published

2018

Contributors

author

Nicolas Moscicki

• Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne

References

• Aubenque P., Faut-il déconstruire la métaphysique ?, PUF Paris 2009.
• Bergson H., L’évolution créatrice, PUF Paris.
• Bergson H., La pensée et le mouvant, PUF Paris.
• Descartes R., Discours de la Méthode, Pléiade Paris 1953.
• Gilson É., Le philosophe et la théologie, Vrin Paris 2005.
• Gilson É., Constantes philosophiques de l’ętre, Vrin Paris 1983.
• Gilson É., L’ętre et l’essence, Vrin Paris 1948 & 1981.
• Gilson É., Methodical Realism, Christendom Press 1990.
• Gilson É., L’Esprit de la Philosophie Médiévale, Vrin Paris 1989.
• Gilson É., Introduction ŕ la philosophie chrétienne, Vrin Paris 2011.
• Heidegger M., Die onto-theologische Verfassung der Metaphysik“ dans „Identität und Differenz, Vittorio Klostermann 2006.
• Heidegger M., Nietzsche II, Klett-Cotta 2008.
• Husserl E., Méditations Cartésiennes, Vrin Paris 1980.
• Kant E., Critique de la Raison Pure, PUF Paris 1993.
• Platon, République, Pléiade Paris 1989.
• Thomas de Aquin, De Ente et Essentia, Vrin Paris 1982.

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki

2075875