Empiryczne modele wzrostu gospodarczego z efektami przestrzennymi

• Authors: Olejnik Anna Alicja
• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

W ostatnich latach w literaturze nauk regionalnych wiele miejsca poświęca się efektom przestrzennym oraz problemom uwzględnienia zależności przestrzennych w specyfikacji regionalnych modeli wzrostu. W kontekście teorii NEG oraz modeli wzrostu endogenicznego, jako główne źródło autokorelacji przestrzennej zaczęto postrzegać tzw. efekty zewnętrzne oraz zjawisko rozprzestrzeniania się. Z punktu widzenia modelowania regionalnego wzrostu gospodarczego istotnej wagi nabrało więc, nie tyle uwzględnianie w modelach zależności przestrzennych (nadal bardzo popularne w literaturze tzw. podejście ad hoc), ale raczej modelowanie efektów przestrzennych z pełnym zrozumieniem ich ekonomicznych przyczyn. Takie podejście pozwala, nie tylko na poprawniejszą konstrukcję modelu pod względem statystycznym, ale daje również możliwość głębszego zrozumienia i interpretacji oszacowanych parametrów w modelach wzrostu.

Keywords

PL

modele przesterzenne; efekty przestrzenne; modelowanie ad-hoc

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 306

Dates

published

2015-01-26

Contributors

author

Olejnik Anna Alicja

• Uniwerystet Łódzki

References

• Abdel-Rahman H. M., Fujita M. (1990), Product variety, Marshallian externalities and city size, „Journal of Urban Economics”, Vol. 33, s. 189–222.
• Anselin L. (1988), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
• Anselin L., Bera A. K. (1998), Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics, [w:] A. Ullah, D. Giles (red.), Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, Marcel Dekker, New York.
• Anselin L., Rey S. J. (1991), Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models, „Geographical Analysis”, Vol. 23, s. 112–131.
• Anselin L., Smirnov O. (1996), Efficient algorithms for constructing proper higher order spatial lag operators, „Journal of Regional Science”, Wiley, 36.
• Armstrong H. (1995), Convergence among regions of the European Union, 1950–1990, „Papers in Regional Science”, 74: 143–152.
• Barro R. J., Sala-i-Martin X. (1992), Convergence, „Journal of Political Economy”, Vol. 100 (2), s. 223–251.
• Baumol W. J. (1986), Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long–run data show, „American Economic Review”, Vol. 76, s. 1072–1085.
• Bernard A., Jones C. (1996), Productivity and convergence across U.S. States and industries, „Empirical Economics”, Vol. 21, s. 113–135.
• Bernat A. (1996), Does manufacturing matter? A spatial econometric view of Kaldor’s laws, „Journal of Regional Science”, Vol. 36, s. 463–477.
• Besner C. (2002), A Spatial Autoregressive Specification with a Comparable Sales Weighting Scheme, „Journal of Real Estate Research”, American Real Estate Society, New York, 24.
• Bivand R., Brundstad R. (2006), Further explorations of interactions between agricultural policy and regional growth in Western Europe: Approaches to nonstationarity in spatial econometrics, „Papers in Regional Science”, Vol. 85 (2).
• Bodson P., Peeters D. (1975), Estimations of the Coefficients of a Linear Regression in the Presence of Spatial Autocorrelation: An Application to a Belgian Labour-Demand Function, „Environment
• and Planning”, A 7 (4).
• Carlino G., Mills L. (1993), Are U.S. regional incomes converging? A time series analysis, „Journal of Monetary Economics”, Vol. 32, s. 335–346.
• Carlino G., Mills L. (1996), Convergence and the US States: a time series analysis, „Journal of Regional Science”, Vol. 36, s. 597–616.
• Chatterji M., Dewhurst J. (1996), Convergence clubs and relative economic performance in Great Britain: 1977–1991, „Regional Studies”, Vol. 30, s. 31–40.
• Ciccone A., Hall R. E. (1996), Productivity and the density of economic activity, „American Economic Review”, Vol. 86, s. 54–70.
• Cliff A., Ord J. K. (1981), Spatial Processes: Models and Applications, Pion, London.
• Dacey M. F. (1968), A Review of Measures of Contiguity for Two and K-Color Maps, Englewood Cliffs Spatial Analysis: A Reader in Statistical Geography, Prentice-Hall.
• Deng M. (2008), An Anisotropic Model for Spatial Processes, „Geographical Analysis”, Wiley 40 (1).
• Dixit A., Stiglitz J. E. (1977), Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, „American Economic Review”, Vol. 67, s. 297–308.
• EUROSTAT (2002), European regional statistics. Reference guide, European Communities, Luxembourg.
• Fingleton B. (1999), Spurious spatial regression: some Monte Carlo results with spatial unit Root and Spatial Cointegration, „Journal of Regional Science”, Vol. 39, s. 1–19.
• Fingleton B. (2006), The new economic geography versus urban economics: an evaluation using local wage rates in Great Britain, „Oxford Economic Papers”, 58.
• Fingleton B., López-Bazo E. (2006), Empirical growth models with spatial effects, „Papers in Regional Science”, Vol. 85 (2), s. 177–198.
• Fingleton B., McCombie J. S. L. (1998), Increasing Returns and Economic Growth: Some Evidence for Manufacturing from the European Union Regions, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 50, s. 89–105.
• Fingleton B., McCombie J. S. L. (1999), Increasing Returns and Economic Growth: Some Evidence for Manufacturing from the European Union Regions: A Correction, Oxford Economic Papers,
• Vol. 51 (3), s. 574–575.
• Fingleton B. (2001), Equilibrium and economic growth: spatial econometric models and simulations, „Journal of Regional Science”, Vol. 41, s. 117–147.
• Fingleton B. (2004), Some alternative geo-economics for Europe’s regions, „Journal of Economic Geography”, Vol. 4, s. 389–420.
• Fischer M. M. (2011), A spatial Mankiw–Romer–Weil model: theory and evidence, Ann Reg Sci, 47: 419–436.
• Florax R., Folmer H. (1992), Specification and estimation of Spatial linear Regression Models: Monte Carlo Evaluation of Pre–Test Estimation, „Regional Science and Urban Economics”,
• Vol. 22, s. 405–432.
• Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A. (1999), The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
• Getis A., Aldstadt J. (2004), Constructing the Spatial Weights Matrix Using A Local Statistic, „Geographical Analysis”, Wiley, 36.
• Guillain R., Dall’erba S., Le Gallo J. (2007), Politiques de développement et croissance régionale en Europe: le rôle des rendements croissants et des dépendances spatiales, Laboratoire d’Economie et de Gestion, Document de travail – Economie, 2.
• Harris R., Lau E. (1998), Verdoorn’s law and increasing returns to scale in the UK regions, 1968–91: some new estimates based on the cointegration approach, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 50, s. 201–219.
• Kaldor N. (1957), A Model of Economic Growth, „Economic Journal”, December, s. 65–94.
• Kelejian H. H., Prucha I. R. (1998), A Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances, „Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics”, Springer, 17.
• Krugman P. (1991), Geography and Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
• Krugman P., Venables A. (1995), Globalization and the inequality of nations, „Quarterly Journal of Economics”, Vol. 110, s. 857–880.
• León-Ledesma M. A. (2000), Economic growth and Verdoorn’s law in the Spanish regions, „International Review of Applied Economics”, Vol. 14, s. 55–69.
• LeSage J. P., Fischer M. M. (2012), Estimates of the Impact of Static and Dynamic Knowledge Spillovers on Regional Factor Productivity, „International Regional Science Review”, 35 (1).
• López-Bazo E., Fingleton B. (2003), Explaining the distribution of manufacturing productivity in the EU regions, ERSA conference papers ersa03p197, European Regional Science Association.
• López-Bazo E., Vayá E., Artis A. (2004), Regional externalities and growth: evidence from European regions, „Journal of Regional Science”, Vol. 44, s. 43–73.
• López-Bazo E., Vayá E., Mora A. J., Suriñach J. (1999), Regional economic dynamics and convergence in the European Union, „The Annals of Regional Science”, Vol. 33, s. 343–370.
• Mankiw N., Romer D., Weil D. (1992), A contribution to the Empirics of Growth, „Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 107.
• Neven D., Gouyette C. (1995), Regional convergence in the European Community, „Journal of Common Market Studies”, Vol. 33, s. 47–65.
• Olejnik A. (2008), Using the spatial autoregressively distributed lag model in assessing the regional convergence of per-capita income in the EU25, „Papers in Regional Science”, Wiley, 87/3.
• Olejnik A. (2012a), Multidimensional spatial process of productivity growth in EU 22, working paper.
• Olejnik A. (2012b), Spatial autoregressive model – a multidimensional perspective with an example study of the spatial income process in the EU 25, working paper.
• Ord J. K., Getis A. (1995), Local Spatial Autocorrelation Statistics: Distributional Issues and an Application, „Geographical Analysis”, 27.
• Pons-Novell J., Viladecans E. (1999), Kaldor’s laws and spatial dependence: evidence for the European regions, „Regional Studies”, Vol. 33, s. 443–451.
• Rey S., Montouri B. (1999), U.S. regional income convergence: A spatial econometric perspective, „Regional Studies”, Vol. 33, s. 143–156.
• Rivera-Batiz F. L. (1988), Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and agglomeration economies
• in consumption and production, „Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier”, Vol. 18 (1), s. 125–153.
• Sala-i-Martin X. (1996), The classical approach to convergence analysis, „Economic Journal”, Vol. 106, 437, s. 1019–1036.
• Verdoorn P. (1949), Fattori che Regolano lo Svilluppo della Produt-tivita del Lavoro. L’Industria, Vol. 1, s. 45–53.