PROČ CHÁPAT POPPERŮV KRITICKÝ DUALISMUS DECISIONISTICKY

• Authors: Buráň Jan

Title variants

EN

Why Popper’s critical dualism should be understood decisionistically

• Languages of publication: CS

Abstracts

EN

There is not much in the open society to suggest that Karl Popper was a moral objectivist. Yet, that is exactly what he himself claimed later in life. Was the widespread “decisionistic” reading of the open society just a grand misunderstanding, or did Popper change his meta-ethical views without acknowledging it? I give reasons as to why we should hold the latter to be true. I also argue that even were the former the case, decisionism would still be more compatible with the open society ideal.

Keywords

EN

CRITICAL DUALISM; POPPER KARL; OPEN SOCIETY; MORAL OBJECTIVISM; MORAL RELATIVISM

• Publisher: Institute of Philosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Filozofia (Philosophy)
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 75
• Issue: 6
• Pages: 474 – 489

Contributors

author

Buráň Jan

• Filozofická fakulta, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Křížkovského 12, 771 80 Olomouc, Czech Republic

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2020.75.6.4