Extended choice functionals – a cardinal framework for the analysis of choice under risk

• Authors: Lahiri Somdeb
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

We propose a framework that extends the one developed by Professor Amartya Sen (with Arrowian roots), for the analysis of choice under risk by an individual, hereafter referred to as a decision maker. The framework is based on the decision maker’s state dependent numerical evaluations − referred to as utility, worth, or pay-off − of the alternatives. We provide several examples to illustrate meaningful possibilities in the model proposed here. The expected utility choice functional assigns to each given state- -dependent data profile (i.e., a pair consisting of a profile of state-dependent evaluation functions and a probability distribution over states of nature) the non-empty set of alternatives obtained by maximizing expected utility. A significant result in this paper, which illustrates the workability of our frameworks of analysis, is an axiomatic characterization of the expected utility choice functional using purely combinatorial techniques. Aim/Purpose: To use a minor extension of the Arrow-Sen model of social choice theory to study individual decision making/aiding under risk and with state dependent evaluation functions. Methodology: Combinatorics (theory of finite sets). Findings: Plausible decision-aids for decision making under uncertainty with state dependent evaluation functions. Research Implications: Exactly same model and results apply for the study of “weighted” multi-criteria decision making/aiding with state dependent evaluation functions. Contribution: Apart from useful decision-aids for managerial decision making under risk and operations research, we provide an axiomatic characterization of the expected utility choice functional.

Keywords

EN

Extended choice functionals; Risk; State-dependent evaluation

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
• Journal: Multiple Criteria Decision Making
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 15
• Pages: 66-78

Contributors

author

Lahiri Somdeb

• School of Petroleum Management, PDE University, India

References

• Allais M. (1953), Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l'école Américaine, Econometrica, 21(4), 503-546.
• d’Aspremont C., Gevers L. (2002), Social Welfare Functional and Interpersonal Comparability [in:] K. Arrow, A. Sen, K. Suzumura (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. Volume 1, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 459-541.
• Karni E. (1985), Decision Making under Uncertainty: The Case of State-Dependent Preference, Harvard University Press.
• Lahiri S. (2019a), The Utilitarian Social Choice Function. Revista Investigacion Operacional, 40(4), 503-515.
• Lahiri S. (2019b), State Salient Decision Rules for Choice under Uncertainty, AIMS International Journal of Management, 13(3), 101-105.
• Lahiri S. (2019c), The No-spoiler Condition for Choice Correspondences, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 14, 60-74.
• Lahiri S. (2020a), Extended Choice Correspondences and an Axiomatic Characterization of the Probabilistic Borda Rule, Mathematical Methods in Economics and Finance (forthcoming in).
• Lahiri S. (2020b), Generalized Sen-Coherence and Existence of Preferred with Probability at Least Half Winners, International Journal of Operations Research, 17(3), 93-99.
• Pattanaik P.K. (1970), Sufficient Conditions for the Existence of a Choice Set under Majority Voting, Econometrica, 38(1), 165-170.
• Puppe C., Schlag K. (2009), Choice under Complete Uncertainty when Outcome Spaces Are Statedependent, Theory and Decision, 66, 1-16.
• Resnik M.D. (1987), Choices: An Introduction to Decision Theory, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
• Rubinstein A. (2019), Lecture Notes in Microeconomic Theory, Revised Version of the First Version Published in 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
• Sen A.K. (1970), Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden Day, San Francisco.

Identifiers

ISSN

2084-1531