EN
The article uncovers the essence of the conspiration as a term borrowed from the European languages. It also revealssemantic and semiotic transformations that mislead the unity of understanding of the meaning of conspiration by the foreignand Ukrainian jurists. The article determines the differences between the nature of the secret performance of the opposite forces— representatives of the criminal, subversive organizations and the state agencies that are fighting against the organized crime.The research suggests approaches to the usage of the term of “conspiration” in legislation, taking into consideration the integrationof Ukraine into the Euro-Atlantic community. In the west- European understanding “conspiration” as a term, is the reflectionof the secret activity of, specifically, illegal organizations that use a complex system of measures in order to ensure their evildoing.Adaptation of this term as an indication of the principles, bases, measures and the actions of the operative crime detection activityauthorities of Ukraine and other countries of the post-Soviet region is the result of semantic confusion and overlaying of the meaningin the understanding of the differences between the nature of the secret activity of the representatives of the criminal worldand the authorities that are competent to fight organized crime.