The relationship between distance-to-default and CDS spreads as measures of default risk for European banks

• Authors: Ristolainen Kim
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

CDS spreads are often seen as the ’leading’ market based, default risk measure. There is no popular alternative to CDS spreads except perhaps for the distance-to-default (D2D) measure based on Merton (1974), which comes very close to it. In this paper, we investigate the correlation and short-term dynamics between these two measures for large European banks with a data panel spanning from 1/2006 to 12/2013. The analysis makes use of conventional Granger causality test statistics for individual banks and for the whole panel data. As regards the results, we found that the lead-lag relationship between these highly related variables varies over time, over different banks, and over economic regimes. The lead of D2D is signifi cantly stronger for banks that are smaller relative to the other banks in the sample, banks in problem countries (PIIGS), after global financial crises, during market turmoil, and for banks with poor credit quality indicated by a high CDS spread. These results and the fact that D2D can be calculated for every bank quoted on the stock exchange suggests that D2D is a promising alternative to the CDS spread in default risk assessment of banks.

Keywords

EN

financial stability; European banks; distance-to-default; credit default swap; lead-lag; relationship

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
• Journal: Journal of Banking and Financial Economics
• Year: 2016
• Issue: 1(5)
• Pages: 121-143

Dates

online

2016-04-27

Contributors

author

Ristolainen Kim

• University of Turku, Finland

References

• Acharya, V.V., Johnson, T.C. (2007) Insider trading in credit derivatives. Journal of Financial Economics 84, pp. 110–141. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.003.
• Acharya, V.V., Lochstoer, L.A., Ramadorai, T. (2013) Limits to arbitrage and hedging: Evidence from commodity markets. Journal of Financial Economics 109, pp. 441–465.
• Ahmed, J., Anderson, C., Zarutskie, R. (2015) Are the borrowing costs of large fi nancial fi rms unusual? Finance and Economics Discussion series No 2015-024 http://dx.doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2015.024.
• Arellano, M. (1987) Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 49, pp. 431–34. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.1987.mp49004006.x.
• Berg, A., Pattillo, C. (1999) Predicting currency crises: The indicators approach and an alternative. Journal of International Money and Finance 18, pp. 561–586.
• Bharath, S., Shumway, T. (2008) Forecasting default with the merton distance to default model. Review of Financial Studies 21, pp. 1339–1369.
• Black, F., Scholes, M. S. (1973) The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81, pp. 637–654.
• Blanco, R., Brennan, S., Marsh, I.W. (2005) An empirical analysis of the dynamic relation between investment-grade bonds and credit default swaps. The Journal of Finance 60, pp. 2255–2281.
• Crosbie, P., Bohn, J. (2003) Modeling default risk. Moody’s KMV Company. Duffi e, D. (1999) Credit swap valuation. Financial Analyst Journal 55, pp. 73–87.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n1.2243.
• Forte, S., Pena, J.I. (2009) Credit spreas: An empirical analysis on the informational content of stocks, bonds and cds. Journal of Banking & Finance 33, pp. 2013–2025. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.04.0152014.
• Harada, K., Ito, T., Takahashi, S. (2010) Is the distance to default a good measure in predicting bank failures? case studies. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No 16182. doi: 10.1016/j.japwor.2013.03.007.
• Jessen, C., Lando, D. (2015) Robustness of distance-to-default. Journal of Banking & Finance 50, pp. 493–505. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.05.016.
• Juessen, F., Linnemann, L. (2010) Estimating Panel VARs from Macroeconomic Data: Some Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to OECD Public Spending Shocks. Discussion paper: Sonderforschungsbereich Statistical Modelling of Nonlinear Dynamic Processes, SFB 823 No 24/2010.
• Kaminsky, G., Lizondo, S., Reinhart, C.M. (1998) Leading indicators of currencycrises. IMF Staff Paper 45, pp. 1–48.
• Merton, R.C. (1974) On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. The Journal of Finance 29, pp. 449–470.
• Milne, A. (2014) Distance to default and the fi nancial crises. Journal of fi nancial stability 12, pp. 26-36. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2013.05.005.
• Norden, L., Weber, M. (2004) Informational effi ciency of credit default swap and stock markets: The impact of credit rating announcements. Journal of Banking & Finance 28, pp. 2813–2843. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfi n.2004.06.011.
• Sy, A. N. R., Chan-Lau, J. A. (2006) Distance-To-Default in Banking; A Bridge too Far? IMF Working Papers No 06/215. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jbr.2350056.
• Tolo, E., Jokivuolle, E., Viren, M. (2015) Do banks’ overnight borrowing rates lead their cds price? evidence from theeurosystem. ECB Working Paper No 1809.
• Vlz, M., Wedow, M. (2011) Market discipline and too-big-to-fail in the cds market: Does banks’ size reduce market discpline? Journal of Empirical Finance 18, pp. 195–210. doi:10.1016/j.jempfi n.2011.01.001.
• Zhang, G., Zhang, S. (2013) Information effi ciency of the u.s. credit default swap market: Evidence from earnings surprises. Journal of fi nancial stability 9, pp. 720–730. doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2011.10.005.

Identifiers

ISSN

2353-6845

DOI

10.7172/2353-6845.jbfe.2016.1.5