Intertextualität als Teil der Argumentationskompetenz

• Authors: Massud Abdel‑Hafiez

Title variants

EN

Intertextuality as a Part of Argumentative Competence

• Languages of publication: DE

Abstracts

EN

This paper addresses the role of intertextuality as a part of argumentative competence of prospective students with and without first language German in written reasoning. An explicit and an implicit concept for the analysis of intertextuality is proposed. The focus of the analysis is a corpus of 40 articles, written by students. The test subjects are on the one hand 20 students who have German as their first language or who were born and socialized in Germany, and on the other 20 students with a migrant background who have a different first language (e. g. Turkish, Serbian, Croatian, Albanian, Arabic, Kurdish, etc. ). The aim of the analysis of this authentic corpus is to try to find empirically supported answers to the following questions: Which elements of intertextuality are found in students‘ texts at the upper level? By which elements of intertextuality are which argument types constructed? Are there differences between students with German as their first language and those with German as Second Language (= DaZ)? And how relevant are the respective arguments? After discussing the different concepts of intertextuality, this paper formulates its own definition. My method is quantitative and at the same time qualitative. The article addresses questions to the corpus, e. g. whether there are explicit or implicit elements of intertextuality; And if so, which ones? And to which reference texts (e. g. texts, authority, experience, world and media knowledge, etc.) could these elements of intertextuality be traced? And which of the identified elements serve to construct or present an argument (e. g. authority arguments, analogy arguments)? The paper concludes that most of the arguments constructed intertextually are the authority arguments, the analogy, and generalization arguments. In addition, the article comes to the conclusion that the directly or indirectly quoted texts were often misunderstood or manipulated. The paper therefore argues for a more conscious inclusion of intertextual competence in argumentation didactics.

Keywords

EN

argumentation competence; intertextuality; authority arguments; analogy arguments

• Publisher: Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT – Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe
• Journal: Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław
• Year: 2021
• Issue: 19
• Pages: 187-204

Dates

published

2021-06-17

Contributors

author

Massud Abdel‑Hafiez

• PH Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe

References

• Adamzik, Kirsten. Sprache – Wege zum Verstehen. 2. Aufl. Tübingen, Basel: Francke, 2004. Print.
• Adamzik, Kirsten. „Textsorten und ihre Beschreibung“. Textlinguistik: 15 Einführungen und eine Diskussion. Hrsg. Nina Janich. Tübingen: Narr, 2., überarb. und erw. Aufl, 2019, 135–168. Print.
• Ahmadian, Moussa und Hooshang Yazdani. “A Study of the effects of intertextuality awareness on reading literary texts: The case of short stories”. Journal of Educational and Social Research 3, H. 2 (2013): 155–166. Print.
• Austermühl, Frank. The Great American Scaffold: intertextuality and identity in American presidential discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture vol. 53, 2014. Print.
• Bazerman, Charle. “Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts”. What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices. Hrsg. Charles Bazerman und Paul Prior. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004, 83–96. Print.
• Broich, Ulrich und Manfred Pfister (Hrsg.). Intertextualität. Formen, Funktionen, anglistische Fallstudien. (Konzepte der Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, 35). Tübingen: Gruyter, 1985. Print.
• Drăghici, Cinzia Carmina. „Postmoderne und intertextuelle Bezüge im Roman ‚Das Parfum‘ von Patrick Süskind“. Temeswarer Beiträge zur Germanistik 9 (2012), 81–86 , Print.
• Drury, Jeffrey P. Mehltretter. Argumentation in Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2019. Print.
• Eggler, Marcel. Argumentationsanalyse textlinguistisch. Argumentative Figuren für und wider den Golfkrieg von 1991. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2006. Print.
• Fairclough, Norman. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992. Print
• Fix, Ulla. „Text und Textlinguistik“. Textlinguistik: 15 Einführungen und eine Diskussion. 2., überarb. und erw. Aufl. Hrsg. Nina Janich. Tübingen: Narr, 2019, 17–34. Print.
• Harras, Gisela. „Intertextualität von linguistischen Fachtexten: ein Analysebeispiel“. Fachsprachen. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Fachsprachenforschung und Terminologiewissenschaft. 1. Halbbd. Hrsg. Lothar Hoffmann, Hartwig Kalverkämper und Herbert Ernst Wiegand. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 1998, 602–610. Print.
• Hessisches Kultusministerium. Berufliche Schulen des Landes Hessen Lehrplan Fachoberschule Allgemein bildender Lernbereich Deutsch https://kultusministerium.hessen.de/sites/default/ files/HKM/lp_fos_abl-deutsch.pdf. 1.11.2019.
• Hoffmann, Sarah. Argumentative Strukturen in Sprichwörtern. Bern: Lang, 2012. Print.

Identifiers

DOI

10.23817/lingtreff.19-12