Floating Collections – an Alternative Concept in Library Collection Management

• Authors: Cessak-Obydzińska Beata Anna
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article is about an alternative concept in library collection management – loating collections – very popular in American public libraries nowadays. Selected literature is presented, the history of approach and a case study from Monterey county Free Libraries (McFL) where the author of this article works. potential beneits and challenges of loating collections are presented as well.

Keywords

EN

Library collections; Floating collections; Collection management; Public libraries

PL

Zbiory biblioteczne; Zarzadzanie zbiorem; Biblioteki publiczne

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Folia Bibliologica
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 58
• Pages: 119-134

Dates

published

2016-12-20

Contributors

author

Cessak-Obydzińska Beata Anna

• Monterey County Free Libraries

References

• Addleman J., Monterey County Free Libraries Strategic Plan 2013–2016, 2012 [online]: http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/library/2013StrategicPlan.pdf [accessed: 15.11.2016].
• Bartlett W.K., Floating collections: a collection development model for long-term success, Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited Inc., 2014.
• Canty A., Frolek L.C., Thornley R.P., Andriats C.J., Bombak L.K., Lay Ch.R., Dell M., Floating collections at Edmonton Public Library, „ Evidence Based Library and Information Practice” 2012, Vol. 7, nr 1, s. 65–69.
• Cress A., The latest wave, “Library Journal” 2004, T. 129, nr 16, s. 48–50.
• Enis M., Industry: Decision Center Releases Floating Collection Module, “Library Journal” 2013, T. 138, nr 18, s. 21.
• Glover C., Langstaff G., Floating collections within a consortium: Or, does it matter where the materials are shelved?, “PNLA Quarterly” 2006, Vol. 71, nr 1, s. 12–13.
• Hedlund O., Copeland A., Collection Management and the Budget Crunch: Are We Adequately Preparing Library Students for Current Practices?, “Collection Building” 2013, 32 (4), s. 128–132 [online]: https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/4586/hedlund-2013-collection.pdf?sequence=1 [accessed: 15.11.2016].
• Johal J., Quigley T., Bartlett W., Kressler T., Gafiney J., Bartel C., Nesbit R., Zielinksi M., Cropper D., Take the plunge! Implementing floating collections in your library system, “Public Libraries” 2012, 51 (3), s. 13–20.
• Franklin W., Lambert M., Ligh B., Mendez E., Redfield N., Report on Issues Regarding Possible Implementation of Floating Collections in the Contra Costa County Library, 2005 [online]: http://ccclib.org/libinfo/Commission/Meetings/2005/May/doggedretrieversfinal.pdf [accessed: 15.11.2016].
• Rutherford N., To Float or Not To Float. Inside Nashville PL’s examination of the method’s performance, “Library Journal” 2016, T. 141, nr 6, s. 46–48 [online] http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2016/04/collection-development/to-float-or-not-to-floatcollectionmanagement/#_[sccessed: 15.11.2016].
• Weber K.E., [ed.], The Benefits and Drawbacks of Working with Floating Collections: The Perceptions of Public Librarians, Chapel Hill; North Carolina, 2014 [online]: https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/indexablecontent/uuid:8dcb9639-47a0-4bb4-80c6-0e38e56b3ed0 [accessed: 15.11.2016].

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/fb.2016.58.119