The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict? Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)

• Authors: Mateusz Radomyski
• Languages of publication: EN
• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
• Journal: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 5(6)
• Pages: 297-311

Dates

published

2012-03-30

Contributors

author

Mateusz Radomyski

References

• Bernatt M., Sprawiedliwość proceduralna w postępowaniu przed organem ochrony konkurencji [Procedural fairness in proceedings before competition authorities], Warsaw 2011
• Boeshertz C., Kleiner T., Nouet G., Petit L., von Koppenfels U., Rabassa V., ‘Lagardère/Natexis/VUP: big deal in a small world’ (2004) 1 EC Competition Policy Newsletter
• Clay K., Krishnan R., Wolff E., Fernandes D., ‘Retail Strategies on the web: price and non-price competition in the online book industry’ (2002) 3 Journal of Industrial Economics
• Hovenkamp H., The Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005
• Kohutek K., Sieradzka M., Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów, Komentarz [The Act on protection of competition and consumer. Commentary], LEX, 2008
• Lauwaars R. H., ‘Rights of Defence in Competition Cases’, [in:] D. Curtin et al. (eds.), Institutional Dynamics of European Integration, Leiden 1994
• Skoczny T., ‘Polskie prawo kontroli koncentracji – ewolucja, model, wybrane problemy’ [‘Polish law on the control of concentrations – evolution, models, and selected issues’] (2010) 5 Europejski Przegląd Sądowy