Metaphysics and Evolution: Response to Critics

• Authors: Polis Dennis F.
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

I respond to Michał Chaberek’s and Robert A. Delfino’s criticisms of my argument that evolution is compatible with Aristotelian-Thomistic metaphysics. Biological species, as secondary substances, are beings of reason founded in the natures of their instances. They are traceable to God’s creative intent, but not to universal exemplars. Aquinas teaches that concepts are derived from sensible accidents. Thus, evolution’s directed variation of such accidents will eventually require new species concepts. This accords with projective realism, which allows diverse, well-founded concepts based on the multiple perspectives and conceptual spaces of knowing subjects. Charges that this is nominalism, not moderate realism, are rebutted; however, it is relativism because knowledge is a subject-object relation. Other metaphysical issues are considered. Chaberek’s thesis that species cannot evolve naturally fails because he: (1) reifies the species concept, (2) misrepresents the motivation, structure and conclusions of evolution, (3) confuses Aristotle’s four causes and (4) limits God’s creative omnipotence. Finally, Chaberek is out of step with contemporary theology.

Keywords

EN

Aristotelianism; Thomism; evolution; substance-accident distinction; epistemology; moderate realism; projective realism; nominalism; relativism; intentional existence; teleology; laws of nature; species problem; intelligent design; problem of universals; abstraction; exemplar ideas; creationism

• Publisher: International Étienne Gilson Society
• Journal: Studia Gilsoniana
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 10
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 847-891

Dates

published

2021-12-30

Contributors

author

Polis Dennis F.

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8896-7333

References

• A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs, edited by David W. Bercot. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers, Inc., 1998.
• Angelelli, Ignacio. Studies on Gottlob Frege and Traditional Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 1967.
• Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima. Translated by Kenelm Foster, O.P., and Sylvester Humphries, O.P. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1951. Available online at: https://isidore.co/aquinas/english/DeAnima.htm#19L. Accessed Nov. 5, 2021.
• Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics: Books I–II. Translated by Richard J. Blackwell, Richard J. Spath & W. Edmund Thirlkel. Yale: Yale University Press, 1963. Available online at: https://isidore.co/aquinas/Physics.htm. Accessed Nov. 5, 2021.
• Aquinas, Thomas. De Ente et Essentia [On Being and Essence]. Translated by Gyula Klima. In Medieval Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary, edited by Gyula Klima, Fritz Allhoff and Anand Jayprakash, 227–249. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
• Aquinas, Thomas. De Potentia Dei. On the Power of God. Translated by the English Dominican Fathers. Westminster, Md.: The Newman Press, 1952.
• Aquinas, Thomas. De Substantiis Separatis. Treatise on Separate Substances. Translated by Francis J. Lescoe. West Hartford Conn.: Saint Joseph College, 1959. Available online at: https://isidore.co/aquinas/SubstSepar.htm. Accessed Nov. 5, 2021.
• Aquinas, Thomas. The Division and Methods of the Sciences: Questions V and VI of His Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius. Translated by Armand Maurer. 4th Revised Edition. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1986.
• Aquinas, Thomas. On the Truth of the Catholic Faith: Summa Contra Gentiles. Translated by Anton C. Pegis, F.R.S.C. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co., 1955.
• Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae. 5 Volumes. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Westminster, Md.: Christian Classics, 1981. Available on-line at: https://www.newadvent.org/summa/. Accessed Nov. 5, 2021.
• Aquinas, Thomas. Truth: A Translation of Quaestiones Disputatae De Veritate, Volume I, Questions I–IX. Translated by Robert W. Mulligan, S.J. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1952.
• Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Translated by J. L. Ackrill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963.
• Aristotle. Metaphysics. 2 Volumes. Translated by W. D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1924.
• Aristotle. On the Soul. Translated by Walter Stanley Hett. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1957).
• Aristotle. Physics. Translated by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
• Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. Translated by E. S. Bouchier. Oxford: B. H. Blackwell, 1901. Available online at: https://oll-resources.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/oll3/store/titles/902/0248_Bk.pdf. Accessed Nov. 5, 2021.
• Bardi, Juliana, and Antonio C. Marques. “Taxonomic Redescription of the Portuguese Man-of-War, Physalia physalis (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa, Siphonophorae, Cystonectae) from Brazil.” Iheringia, Série Zoologia 97, no. 4 (30 December 2007): 425–433. DOI: 10.1590/S0073-47212007000400011.
• Bateson, Patrick, Nancy Cartwright, John Dupré, Kevin Laland and Denis Noble. “New Trends in Evolutionary Biology: Biological, Philosophical and Social Science Perspectives.” Interface Focus 7, no. 5 (2017). DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2017.0051.
• Behe, Michael J. Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2001.
• Broadbent, Donald E. “The Magical Number Seven after Fifteen Years.” In Studies in Long-Term Memory, edited by Alan Kennedy and Alan Wilkes, 3–18. New York: Wiley, 1975.
• Brower, Jeffrey E. “Aquinas on the Problem of Universals.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92, no. 2 (2016): 715–735. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12176.
• Chaberek, Michal, “Classical Metaphysics and Theistic Evolution: Why Are They Incompatible?” Studia Gilsoniana 8, no. 1 (January–March 2019): 47–81. DOI: 10.26385/SG.080102.
• Chaberek, Michal, “Metaphysics and Evolution: A Response to Dennis F. Polis.” Studia Gilsoniana 10, no. 1 (January–March 2021): 45–69. DOI: 10.26385/SG.100102.
• Copleston, Fredrick, S.J. A History of Philosophy. Vol. 2. Westminister, Md.: Newman Books, 1950.
• Darwin, Charles. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray, 1859.
• De Wulf, Maurice. “Nominalism, Realism, Conceptualism.” In The Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 11. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1911. Available online at: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11090c.htm. Accessed April 21, 2021.
• Delfino, Robert A. “The Compatibility of Evolution and Thomistic Metaphysics: A Reply to Dennis F. Polis.” Studia Gilsoniana 10, no. 1 (January–March 2021): 71–102. DOI: 10.26385/SG.100103.
• Dubray, Charles. “Species.” In The Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 14. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1912. Available online at: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14210a.htm. Accessed Nov. 5, 2021.
• Freddoso, Alfred J. “God’s General Concurrence with Secondary Causes: Pitfalls and Prospects.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 68, no. 2 (1994): 131–156. DOI: 10.5840/acpq199468224.
• Gasiorowicz, Stephen. Quantum Physics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974.
• Gilson, Étienne. The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York: Random House, 1956.
• Goodwin, Colin Robert. A Translation of the Quaestio Disputata De Spiritualibus Creaturis of St. Thomas Aquinas, with Accompanying Notes. Master’s thesis. Fitzroy, Victoria: Australian Catholic University, June 24, 2002. Available online at: https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/download/b4a512f67eead513c15b47b40a166eb9f2c817c2501ebc737014f101ea304eb1/1015553/64883_downloaded_stream_108.pdf. Accessed Nov. 5, 2021.
• Gould, Stephen J. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002.
• Halmos, Paul Richard. Finite-Dimensional Vector Spaces. 4th edition. New York: Springer, 1987.
• Hinde, Rosalind T. “The Cnidaria and Ctenophora.” In Invertebrate Zoology, edited by Donald Thomas Anderson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
• International Theological Commission. Communion and Stewardship: Human Persons Created in the Image of God. Plenary sessions, Rome 2000–2002. July 2004. Available online at: https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20040723_communion-stewardship_en.html. Accessed Sept. 21, 2021.
• Leftow, Brian. “Aquinas on Attributes.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11 (2003): 1–41. DOI: 10.1017/S105706080300001X.
• Maurer, Armand A., “Darwin, Thomists, and Secondary Causality.” The Review of Metaphysics 57, no. 3 (March 2004): 491–514.
• Maurer, Armand A., Medieval Philosophy. New York: Random House, 1962.
• Maurer, Armand A. Thomas Aquinas: The Division and Method of the Sciences. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1986.
• Mercier, Désiré-Joseph. Cours de Philopophie, Vol. IV: Critériologie. Louvain: Institut Supériour de Philosophie, 1906.
• Morse, Philip M. and Herman Feshbach. Methods of Theoretical Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1953.
• Owens, Joseph. “Thomistic Common Nature and Platonic Idea.” Medieval Studies 21, no. 1 (1959): 211–223.
• Polis, Dennis F. “A New Reading of Aristotle’s Hyle.” The Modern Schoolman 63, no. 8 (March 1991): 225–244. Available online at: https://philarchive.org/rec/POLANR. Accessed Nov. 5, 2021.
• Polis, Dennis F. “Evolution: Mind or Randomness?” Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies XXII, no. 1/2 (2010): 32–66. DOI: 10.5840/jis2010221/22.
• Polis, Dennis F. God, Science and Mind: The Irrationality of Naturalism. Fontana, Calif.: Xianphil Press, 2012.
• Polis, Dennis F. “Paradigms for an Open Philosophy.” Metaphilosophy 24, no. 1/2 (January–April 1993): 33–46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.1993.tb00443.x.
• Polis, Dennis F. “The Compatibility of Evolution and Classical Metaphysics.” Studia Gilsoniana 9, no. 4 (October–December 2020): 551–585. DOI: 10.26385/SG.090424.
• Pope John Paul II. “Message to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences: On Evolution.” October 22, 1996. Available online at: https://humanorigins.si.edu/sites/default/files/MESSAGE%20TO%20THE%20PONTIFICAL%20ACADEMY%20OF%20SCIENCES%20(Pope%20John%20Paul%20II).pdf. Accessed Sept. 21, 2021.
• Pope Pius XII. Humani Generis. August 12, 1950. Available online at: https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis.html. Accessed Sept. 21, 2021.
• Pospíšil, Ctirad V. “Joseph Knabenbauer SJ (1839–1911) a otázka evolučního vzniku člověka.” Acta Universitatis Carolinae Theologica 7, no. 1 (January 8, 2017): 143–155. DOI: 10.14712/23363398.2017.6.
• Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “Nominalism in Metaphysics.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Summer 2019. Available online at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nominalism-metaphysics/. Accessed Nov. 5, 2021.
• Shanley, Brian J. “Analytical Thomism.” The Thomist 63, no. 1 (1999): 125–137. DOI: 10.1353/tho.1999.0046.
• Tabaczek, Mariusz, “The Metaphysics of Evolution: From Aquinas’s Interpretation of Augustine’s Concept of Rationes Seminales to the Contemporary Thomistic Account of Species Transformism.” Nova et Vetera 18, no. 3 (Summer 2020): 945–972. DOI: 10.1353/nov.2020.0048.
• Wasmann, Erich. “Catholics and Evolution.” In The Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 5. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1909. Available online at: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05654a.htm. Accessed Nov. 5, 2021.
• Weiss, Madeline C., Filipa L. Sousa, Natalia Mrnjavac, Sinje Neukirchen, Mayo Roettger, Shijulal Nelson-Sathi & William F. Martin. “The Physiology and Habitat of the Last Universal Common Ancestor.” Nature Microbiology 1, 16116 (25 July 2016). DOI: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.116.
• Wilkins, John S. “Philosophically Speaking, How Many Species Concepts Are There?” Zootaxa 2765, no. 1 (2011): 58–60. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2765.1.5.
• Willis, John R. The Teachings of the Church Fathers. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1966.

Notes

EN

DOI: 10.26385/SG.100436