Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 1 | 113-124

Article title

The United Kingdom against Russia’s attempts to maintain the zones of influence on the example of the Ukrainian crisis

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The subject of the paper are the United Kingdom’s actions against Russia's attempts to maintain its zones of influence, based on the example of the Ukrainian crisis. The introduction consists of a synthetic outline of the geopolitical rivalry between Russia and Great Britain. The next section discusses the attitude of the United Kingdom towards Russia’s attempts to maintain its zones of influence in the 21st century. The main section of the paper focuses on the United Kingdom’s actions against Russia’s military policy in Ukraine. The main thesis of the paper assumes that during the Ukrainian crisis, the UK has taken the most far-reaching measures so far to oppose Russia’s attempts to maintain zones of influence. The consequence of this is a significant deterioration in Russian-British relations due to the Ukrainian crisis. The leading paradigm is structural realism. The method of text source analysis was used in the paper.

Year

Volume

1

Pages

113-124

Physical description

Dates

published
2021-06-30

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

References

  • AALTO, P. (2009), EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES FOR MANAGING DEPENDENCE. IN: PEROVIC, J./ORTTUNG, R. W./WENGER, A. (EDS.), RUSSIAN ENERGY POWER AND FOREIGN RELATIONS. IMPLICATIONS FOR CONFLICT AND COOPERATION. LON-DON/NEW YORK, 157-180. Google Scholar
  • ARAKELYAN, L. A. (2014). THE SOVIET UNION IS DEAD: LONG LIVE THE EURASIAN UNION! IN: KANET, R. E./PIET R. (EDS.), SHIFTING PRIORITIES IN RUSSIA’S FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY. LONDON/NEW YORK, 141-162. Google Scholar
  • BLACK, J. L. (2015). THE RUSSIAN PRESIDENCY OF DMITRY MEDVEDEV, 2008-2012. THE NEXT STEP FORWARD OR MERELY A TIME OUT? LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • CALLAGHAN, J. (2007), THE LABOUR PARTY AND FOREIGN POLICY. A HISTORY. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • CAWKWELL, T. W. (2016), UK COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES FOR AFGHANISTAN, 2001–2014. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • CHENOY, A. M./KUMAR, R. (2017), RE-EMERGING RUSSIA. STRUCTURES, INSTITUTIONS AND PROCESSES. SINGAPORE. Google Scholar
  • CICHOS, K. (2018), „WARTOŚCI” CZY BEZPIECZEŃSTWO? POLITYKA SĄSIEDZKA UE (NA PRZYKŁADZIE RELACJI Z UKRAINĄ). IN: PRZEGLĄD WSCHODNIOEUROPEJSKI. IX/1, 119-128. Google Scholar
  • CLOSSON, S. (2009), RUSSIA’S KEY CUSTOMER: EUROPE. IN: PEROVIC, J./ORTTUNG, R. W./WENGER, A. (EDS.), RUSSIAN ENERGY POWER AND FOREIGN RELATIONS. IMPLICATIONS FOR CONFLICT AND COOPERATION. LONDON/NEW YORK, 89-108. Google Scholar
  • CODNER, M. (2016), AN INSTRUMENT OF HONOUR? BRITAIN’S MILITARY STRATEGY AND THE IMPACT OF NEW TECHNOLO-GIES. IN: BROWN, D. (ED.), THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRITISH DEFENCE POLICY. BLAIR, BROWN AND BEYOND. LON-DON/NEW YORK, 189-214. Google Scholar
  • COUGHLIN, C. (2018), RUSSIA POSES GREATER THREAT TO BRITAIN THAN ISIL, SAYS NEW ARMY CHIEF. THE TELEGRAPH. 23 NOVEMBER. IN: HTTPS://WWW.TELEGRAPH.CO.UK/NEWS/2018/11/23/RUSSIA-POSES-GREATER-THREAT-BRITAIN-ISIL-SAYS-NEW-ARMY-CHIEF/ [ACCESS: 20 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • DOBSON, A. P. (1995), ANGLO-AMERICAN RELATIONS IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY. OF FRIENDSHIP, CONFLICT AND THE RISE AND DECLINE OF SUPERPOWERS. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • DONALDSON, R. H./NOGEE, J. L./NADKARNI, V. (2015), THE FOREIGN POLICY OF RUSSIA. CHANGING SYSTEMS, ENDUR-ING INTERESTS. FIFTH EDITION. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • DOVER, R. (2016), EUROPEANIZATION OF BRITISH DEFENCE POLICY. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • ENGELBREKT, K./VASSILEV, I. (2010), EUROPEAN ENERGY POLICY MEETS RUSSIAN BILATERALISM: THE CASE OF SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPE. IN: ENGELBREKT, K./NYGREN, B. (EDS), RUSSIA AND EUROPE. BUILDING BRIDGES, DIGGING TRENCHES. LONDON/NEW YORK, 187-206. Google Scholar
  • FEDOROV, Y. E. (2010), THE RETURN OF HISTORY: HARD SECURITY ISSUES IN THE RUSSIA–EUROPE RELATIONSHIP. IN: ENGEL-BREKT, K./NYGREN, B. (EDS), RUSSIA AND EUROPE. BUILDING BRIDGES, DIGGING TRENCHES. LONDON/NEW YORK, 103-131. Google Scholar
  • GENERAL ASSEMBLY UN (2014), RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY ON 27 MARCH 2014. 68/262. TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY OF UKRAINE. NEW YORK. 27 MARCH. IN: HTTPS://WWW.UN.ORG/EN/GA/SEARCH/VIEW_DOC.ASP?SYMBOL=A/RES/68/262 [ACCESS: 12 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • GOODE, J. P. (2011), THE DECLINE OF REGIONALISM IN PUTIN’S RUSSIA. BOUNDARY ISSUES. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • GOWLAND, D. (2017), BRITAIN AND THE EUROPEAN UNION. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • HER MAJESTY GOVERNMENT (2015), NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY AND STRATEGIC DEFENCE AND SECURITY REVIEW 2015. A SECURE AND PROSPEROUS UNITED KINGDOM. LONDON. IN: HTTPS://ASSETS.PUBLISHING.SERVICE.GOV.UK/GOVERNMENT/UPLOADS/SYSTEM/UPLOADS/ATTACHMENT_DATA/FILE/478933/52309_CM_9161_NSS_SD_REVIEW_WEB_ONLY.PDF [ACCESS: 12 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • HODGE, C. (2006), BRITAIN AND THE BALKANS. 1991 UNTIL THE PRESENT. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • HOUSE OF LORDS (2015), EUROPEAN UNION COMMITTEE, 6TH REPORT OF SESSION 2014–15. THE EU AND RUSSIA: BEFORE AND BEYOND THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE. 20 FEBRUARY. IN: HTTPS://PUBLICATIONS.PARLIAMENT.UK/PA/LD201415/LDSELECT/LDEUCOM/115/115.PDF [ACCESS: 16 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • KMIECIK, P. (2013), REALIZM STRUKTURALNY OFENSYWNY, DEFENSYWNY I ZALEŻNY. IN: HTTP://WWW.NOWASTRATEGIA.ORG.PL/REALIZM/ [ACCESS: 10 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • KOCHO-WILLIAMS, A. (2013), RUSSIA’S INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • KOVAL, N. (2018), UNITED KINGDOM. IN: MAKSAK, H./TURCSÁNYI, R. Q./VOROTNYUK, M. (EDS.), UNDERSTANDING STRA-TEGIC ADAPTATIONS: SECURITY STRATEGIES AND POLICIES AFTER 2014. BRATISLAVA / KYIV. Google Scholar
  • KRAMER, A. E. (2018), RUSSIA EXPELS 23 BRITISH DIPLOMATS, ESCALETING ROW OVER EX-SPY’S POISONING. THE NEW YORK TIMES. 17 MARCH. IN: HTTPS://WWW.NYTIMES.COM/2018/03/17/WORLD/EUROPE/RUSSIA-EXPEL-BRITAIN-DIPLOMATS.HTML [ACCESS: 20 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • LANTEIGNE, M. (2016), CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY. AN INTRODUCTION. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • LEICHTOWA, M. (2016), MISUNDERSTANDING RUSSIA. RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY AND THE WEST. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • LOBELL, S. E. (2017), STRUCTURAL REALISM/OFFENSIVE AND DEFENSIVE REALISM. IN: HTTPS://OXFORDRE.COM/INTERNATIONALSTUDIES/VIEW/10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190846626.001.0001/ACREFORE-9780190846626-E-304 [ACCESS: 10 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • LUHN, A. (2018), PUTIN CALLS FOR BETTER UK-RUSSIA RELATIONS AT MASSIVE ANNUAL PRESS CONFERENCE. THE TELEGRAPH. 20 DECEMBER. IN: HTTPS://WWW.TELEGRAPH.CO.UK/NEWS/2018/12/20/PUTIN-HOLDS-MARATHON-ANNUAL-PRESS-CONFERENCE-TURBULENT-YEAR/ [ACCESS: 20 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • MEMORANDUM ON SECURITY ASSURANCES IN CONNECTION WITH UKRAINE'S ACCESSION TO THE TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS (1994), 5 DECEMBER. IN: HTTPS://TREATIES.UN.ORG/DOC/PUBLICATION/UNTS/NO%20VOLUME/52241/PART/I-52241-0800000280401FBB.PDF [ACCESS: 12 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • MILCZANOWSKI, M. (2014), ZACHÓD WOBEC KRYZYSU POLITYCZNEGO NA UKRAINIE (2013-2014). IN: BEZPIECZEŃST-WO: TEORIA I PRAKTYKA. 8/3, 25-38. Google Scholar
  • MORRIS, N./USBORNE, D. (2014), UKRAINE CRISIS: THIS IS EUROPE’S BIGGEST CRISIS IN THE 21ST CENTURY, WARNS WILLIAM HAGUE AS RUSSIA DEFIANTLY THREATENS A MILITARY ASSAULT ON CRIMEA. THE INDEPENDENT. 5 MARCH. IN: HTTPS://WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK/NEWS/WORLD/EUROPE/UKRAINE-CRISIS-WESTERN-COUNTRIES-SCRAMBLE-TO-RESPOND-TO-RUSSIA-AS-ACTING-PRESIDENT-APPEALS-TO-MOSCOW-9166748.HTML [ACCESS: 16 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • NATO’S ENHANCED FORWARD PRESENCE (2019). MARCH. IN: HTTPS://WWW.NATO.INT/NATO_STATIC_FL2014/ASSETS/PDF/PDF_2019_04/20190402_1904-FACTSHEET_EFP_EN.PDF [ACCESS: 16 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • NEUMANN, I. B. (2013), RUSSIA IN INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OVER THE LONGUE DURÉE: LESSONS FROM EARLY RUS’ AND EARLY POST SOVIET STATE FORMATION. IN: TARAS, R. (ED.), RUSSIA’S IDENTITY IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. IMAGES, PER-CEPTIONS, MISPERCEPTIONS. LONDON/NEW YORK, 24-41. Google Scholar
  • NEUMANN, I. B. (2017), RUSSIA AND THE IDEA OF EUROPE. A STUDY IN IDENTITY AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. SECOND EDITION. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • NORTHEDGE, F. S. (2013), BRITAIN'S PLACE IN THE CHANGING WORLD. IN: LEIFER, M. (ED.), CONSTRAINTS AND ADJUST-MENTS IN BRITISH FOREIGN POLICY. LONDON/NEW YORK, 192-208. Google Scholar
  • PACKAGE OF MEASURES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MINSK AGREEMENTS (2015). MINSK. 11 FEBRUARY. IN: HTTPS://PEACEMAKER.UN.ORG/SITES/PEACEMAKER.UN.ORG/FILES/UA_150212_MINSKAGREEMENT_EN.PDF [ACCESS: 12 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • PERRAUDIN, F. (2015), UK GOVERNMENT DEFENDS ROLE IN UKRAINE-RUSSIA CRISIS. THE GUARDIAN. 10 FEBRUARY. IN: HTTPS://WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM/POLITICS/2015/FEB/10/UK-GOVERNMENT-DEFENDS-ROLE-IN-UKRAINE-RUSSIA-CRISIS [ACCESS: 20 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • PIETNOCZKA, P. (2018), UKRAINE’S PATH TO EUROPEAN INTEGRATION. IN: PRZEGLĄD WSCHODNOEUROPEJSKI. IX/1, 153-165. Google Scholar
  • PONSARD, N. (2007), RUSSIA, NATO AND COOPERATIVE SECURITY. BRIDGING THE GAP. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • PROTOCOL ON THE RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS OF THE TRILATERAL CONTACT GROUP (2014), MINSK. 5 SEPTEMBER. IN: HTTPS://WWW.OSCE.ORG/HOME/123257 [ACCESS: 12 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • ROWE, P. (2016), LEGAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND BRITAIN’S WARS 2000–2015. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • SHERR, J. (2008), RUSSIA AND GEORGIA: A DANGEROUS GAME. IN: THE WORLD TODAY. 64/10, 2-24. Google Scholar
  • SIMPSON, J. (2015), THE US-UK SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP. THE NUCLEAR DIMENSION. IN: DOBSON, P./MARSH, S. (EDS.), ANGLO-AMERICAN RELATIONS. CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVES. LONDON/NEW YORK, 241-262. Google Scholar
  • SMITH, M. A. (2016), THE UK AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS. IN: BROWN, D. (ED.), THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRITISH DEFENCE POLICY. BLAIR, BROWN AND BEYOND. LONDON/NEW YORK, 169-188. Google Scholar
  • SNETKOV, A. (2015), RUSSIA’S SECURITY POLICY UNDER PUTIN. A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • STENT, A. (2010), GERMANY – RUSSIA RELATIONS. 1992-2009. IN: ENGELBREKT, K./NYGREN, B. (EDS), RUSSIA AND EU-ROPE. BUILDING BRIDGES, DIGGING TRENCHES. LONDON/NEW YORK, 156-166. Google Scholar
  • STRONG, J. (2017), PUBLIC OPINION, LEGITIMACY AND TONY BLAIR’S WAR IN IRAQ. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • TOMASZEWSKI, J. (2015), WYBRANE ASPEKTY POLITYKI BEZPIECZEŃSTWA WIELKIEJ BRYTANII. IN: BEZPIECZEŃSTWO NARODOWE. IV, 25-40. Google Scholar
  • UK PERSPECTIVE ON UKRAINE CRISIS. IN: HTTP://WWW.GDFORUM.ORG/DD-UK-PERSPECTIVE-ON-UKRAINE-CRISIS [ACCESS: 16 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • U.S., UK STOP APPROVING EXPORT LICENSES FOR RUSSIA (2014), IN: WASHINGTON TARIFF & TRADE LETTER. 34/12, 1-2. IN: HTTP://WWW.WTTLONLINE.COM/HT/A/GETDOCUMENTACTION/I/54791 [ACCESS: 16 VIII 2019]. Google Scholar
  • WALL, S. (2013), THE OFFICIAL HISTORY OF BRITAIN AND THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY. VOLUME II. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar
  • WHITE, B. (1992), BRITAIN, DÉTENTE AND CHANGING EAST-WEST RELATIONS. LONDON/NEW YORK. Google Scholar

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
2081-1128

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-1c582613-6de0-47d5-bbd9-e1ea0bdbca27
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.