What is Diagrammatic Reasoning in Mathematics?

• Authors: Sochański Michał
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In recent years, epistemological issues connected with the use of diagrams and visualization in mathematics have been a subject of increasing interest. In particular, it is open to dispute what role diagrams play in justifying mathematical statements. One of the issues that may appear in this context is: what is the character of reasoning that relies in some way on a diagram or visualization and in what way is it distinct from other types of reasoning in mathematics? In this paper it is proposed to distinguish between several ways of using visualization or diagrams in mathematics, each of which could be connected with a different concept of diagrammatic/visual reasoning. Main differences between those types of reasoning are also hinted at. A distinction between visual (diagrammatic) reasoning and visual (diagrammatic) thinking is also considered.

Keywords

EN

diagrammatic reasoning; philosophy of mathematics

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika (Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń)
• Journal: Logic and Logical Philosophy
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 27
• Issue: 4 Special Issue on Logic, Cognition, Argumentation. Guest Editors: Mariusz Urbański, Michiel van Lambalgen and Marcin Koszowy
• Pages: 567-581

Dates

published

2018-12-15

Contributors

author

Sochański Michał

References

• Bakker, A., 2007, “Diagrammatic reasoning and hypostatic abstraction in statistics education”, Semiotica 164: 9–29. DOI: 10.1515/SEM.2007.017
• Barwise, J., and J. Etchemendy, 1996, “An enhanced argument for innate elementary geometric knowledge and its philosophical implications”, pages 185–206 in J. Barwise and G. Allwein (eds.), Logical Reasoning with Diagrams, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Borwein, P., and L. Jörgenson, 2001, “Visible structures in number theory”, The American Mathematical Monthly, 108, 10: 897–910. DOI: 10.2307/2695413
• De Cruz, M., 2007, “An enhanced argument for innate elementary geometric knowledge and its philosophical implications”, pages 185–206 in B. van Kerkhove (ed.), New Perspectives on Mathematical Practices, World Scientific, New Jersey, London, Singapore. DOI: 10.1142/9789812812230_0009
• Giaquinto, M., 2007, Visual Thinking in Mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285945.001.0001
• Hammer, E., 1994, “Reasoning with sentences and diagrams”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35, 1: 73–87. DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1040609295
• Hanna, G., and N. Sidoli, 2009, “Visualisation and proof: A brief survey of philosophical perspectives”, ZDM Mathematical Education 39, 1–2 (2007): 73–78. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-006-0005-0
• Kulpa, Z., 2009, “Main problems of diagrammatic reasoning. Part I: The generalization problem”, Foundations of Science 14: 75–96.
• Normann, J., 2003, “Visual reasoning in Euclid’s geometry”, University College London: PhD Dissertation.
• Rivera, F.D., 2011, Toward a Visually-Oriented School Mathematics Curriculum, Springer Science+Business Media, Cambridge. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0014-7
• Shimojima, A., 2015, Semantic Properties of Diagrams and Their Cognitive Potentials, CSLI Publications, Stanford.
• Shin, S-J., 2002, The Iconic Logic of Peirce’a Graphs, MIT Press, Hong Kong.