Innowacja w organizacji: Sposoby ujmowania i przegląd uwarunkowań

• Authors: Purc Ewelina , Wałachowska Karolina , Żaliński Adam , Mielniczuk Emilia , Patynowska Ewelina , Łaguna Mariola
• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

Innovation in organization: Defi nitions and review of antecedents

Keywords

PL

innowacja; innowacyjność; zachowania innowacyjne; kreatywność; organizacja

EN

innovation; innovativeness; innovative behaviour; creativity; organization

• Publisher: Science Studies Committee, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 51
• Issue: 4(206)
• Pages: 425-446

Dates

published

2016-01

Contributors

author

Purc Ewelina

• Instytut Psychologii, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

author

Wałachowska Karolina

• Instytut Psychologii, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

author

Żaliński Adam

• Instytut Psychologii, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

author

Mielniczuk Emilia

• Instytut Psychologii, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

author

Patynowska Ewelina

• Instytut Psychologii, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

author

Łaguna Mariola

• Instytut Psychologii, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

References

• Amabile T. M. (1996), Creativity in context, Boulder: CO: Westview Press.
• Aryee S., Walumbwa F. O., Zhou Q., Hartnell C. A. (2012), Transformational Leadership, Innovative Behavior, and Task Performance: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes, “Human Performance” 25: 1–25.
• Ashford S. J., Rothbard N. P., Piderit S. K., Dutton J. E. (1998), Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 43: 23–57.
• Baer M., Evans K., Oldham G. R., Boasso A. (2015), The social network side of individual innovation A meta-analysis and path-analytic integration, “Organizational Psychology Review” 5(3): 191–223.
• Baer M., Frese M. (2003), Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and fi rm performance, “Journal of Organizational Behavior” 24: 45–68.
• Białoń L. (red.) (2010), Zarządzanie działalnością innowacyjną, Warszawa: PLACET.
• Binnewies C., Gromer M. (2012), Creativity and innovation at work: The role of work characteristics and personal initiative, ”Creatividad e innovación laboral: el rol de las características del trabajo y la iniciativa personal” 24(1): 100–105.
• Brown T. (2008), Design thinking, “Harvard Business Review” 86(6): 84–92.
• Bunce D., West M. A. (1995), Self perceptions and perceptions of group climate as predictors of individual innovation at work, “Applied Psychology: An International Review” 44: 199–215.
• Carmeli A., Schaubroeck J. (2007), The infl uence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work, “The Leadership Quarterly” 18: 35–48.
• Chang H.-T., Hsu H.-M., Liou J.-W., Tsai C.-T. (2013), Psychological contracts and innovative behavior: a moderated path analysis of work engagement and job resources, “Journal of Applied Social Psychology” 43: 2120–2135.
• Chang S., Jia L., Takeuchi R., Cai Y. (2014), Do High-Commitment Work Systems Affect Creativity? A Multilevel Combinational Approach to Employee Creativity, “Journal of Applied Psychology” 99(4): 665–680.
• Conti R., Coon H., Amabile T. M. (1996), Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: secondary analyses of three studies, “Creativity Research Journal” 9(4): 385–389.
• Csikszentmihalyi M. (1990), Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, New York: Harper and Row.
• De Spiegelaere S., Van Gyes G., De Witte H., Niesen W., Van Hootegem G. (2014), On the Relation of Job Insecurity, Job Autonomy, Innovative Work Behaviour and the Mediating Effect of Work Engagement, “Creativity and Innovation Management” 23(3): 318–330.
• Dionne S. D., Gupta A., Sotak K. L., Shirreffs K. A., Serban A., Hao C., Kime D. H., Yammarino F. J. (2012), A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research, “The Leadership Quarterly” 25: 6–35.
• Domurat A. (2011), Przedsiębiorczość a kreatywność i innowacyjność, [w:] Innowacyjna przedsiębiorczość. Teorie. Badania. Zastosowania praktyczne. Perspektywa psychologiczna, red. A. Strzałecki, A. Lizurej, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Szkoły Wyższej Psychologii Społecznej „Academica”, s. 93–118.
• Eisenberger R., Armeli S., Pretz J. (1998), Can the promise of reward increase creativity?, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 74: 704–714.
• Eisenberger R., Cameron J. (1996), Detrimental Effects of Reward. Reality or Myth?, “American Psychologist” 51(11): 1153–1166.
• Employer Branding International (2012), 2011 Employer Branding Global Research Study, http://markapracodawcy.pl/najnowszy-raport-ebi-o-swiatowym-rynku-employer-brandingu/ (dostęp: 25.05.2015).
• Farr J. L., Ford C. M. (1990), Individual innovation, w: Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Chichester: Wiley.
• Farson R., Keyes R. (2002), The failure-tolerant leader, “Harvard Business Review” 80(8): 64–11.
• Florida R. (2003), Cities and the creative class, “City & Community” 2(1): 3–19.
• Florida R., Mellander C. P. A., Stolarick K. M. (2010), Talent, technology and tolerance in Canadian regional development, “The Canadian Geographer” 54(3): 277–304.
• Fredrickson B. L. (2000), Why positive emotions matter in organizations: Lessons from the broadenand-build model, “The Psychologist-Manager Journal” 4(2): 131–142.
• Fredrickson B. L. (2001), The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-andbuild theory of positive emotions, “American Psychologist” 56(3): 218–226.
• García-Granero A., Llopis Ó., Fernández-Mesa A., Alegre J. (2015), Unraveling the link between managerial risk-taking and innovation: The mediating role of a risk-taking climate, “Journal of Business Research” 68(5): 1094–1104.
• Garud R., Gehman J., Giulani A. P. (2014), Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective, “Research Policy” 43: 1177–1188.
• Gilson L. L., Shalley C. E. (2004), A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of team’s engagement in creative processes, “Journal of Management” 30: 453–470.
• Goldsmith R. E., Matherly T. A. (1988), Creativity and self-esteem: A multiple operationalization validity study, “Journal of Psychology” 122(1): 47–56.
• Gomes C., Curral L., Caetano A. (2015), The Mediating Effect Of Work Engagement On The Relationship Between Self-Leadership And Individual Innovation, „International Journal of Innovation Management,” 19(1): DOI: 10.1142/S1363919615500097.
• Graen G. B., Uhl-Bien M. (1995), Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective, “Leadership Quarterly” 6(2): 219–247.
• Hammond M. M., Neff N. L., Farr J. L., Schwall A. R., Zhao X. (2011), Predictors of individuallevel innovation at work: A meta-analysis, “Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts” 5(1): 90–105.
• Hartmann A. (2006), The role of organizational culture in motivating innovative work behavior in construction organizations, “Construction Innovation” 3(6): 159–172.
• Heunks F. J. (1998), Innovation, creativity and success, “Small Business Economics” 10(3): 263–272.
• Hirsch-Kreinsen H. (2010), Technological innovation and fi nance, “Soziologisches Arbeitspapier” 27: 1–28.
• Hsu M. L. A., Hou S.-T., Fan H.-L. (2011), Creative self-effi cacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator, “Journal of Creative Behavior” 45(4): 258–272.
• Huber G. P. (1991), Organizational learning: The contributing processes and literatures, “Organization Science” 2: 88–115.
• Isaksen S. G. (2007), The situational outlook questionnaire: Assessing the context for change, “Psychological Report” 100: 455–466.
• Isen A. M. (1987), Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior, w: Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 20, red. L. Berkowitz, San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press, s. 203–253.
• Jafri H. (2010), Organizational commitment and employee’s innovative behavior, “Journal of Management Research” 10(1): 62–68.
• Janssen O. (2000), Job demands, perceptions of effort—reward fairness and innovative work behavior, “Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology” 17: 287–302.
• Jaussi K. S., Dionne S. D. (2003), Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional leader behavior, “The Leadership Quarterly” 14: 475–498.
• Jennings Ch., Wargnier J. (1996), Effective Learning with 70:20:10. The new frontier for the extended enterprise, Crossknowledge.
• Kahn W. A. (1990), Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, “Academy of Management Journal” 33: 692–724.
• Kanter R. M. (1988), When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organization, “Research in Organizational Behavior” 10: 169–211.
• Kheng Y. K., Mahmood R. (2013), The Relationship between Pro-Innovation Organizational Climate, Leader-Member Exchange and Innovative Work Behavior: A Study among the Knowledge Workers of the Knowledge Intensive Business Services in Malaysia, “Business Management Dynamics” 2(8): 15–30.
• Laursen K., Foss N. J. (2003), New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance, “Cambridge Journal of Economics” 27: 243–263.
• Li C.-H., Wu J. J. (2011), The structural relationships between optimism and innovative behavior: Understanding potential antecedents and mediating effects, “Creativity Research Journal” 23(2): 119–128.
• Lin H.-E., McDonough III E. F. (2011), Investigating the Role of Leadership and Organizational Culture in Fostering Innovation Ambidexterity, “IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management” 58(3): 497–509.
• Lukes M. (2013), Entrepreneurs as innovators: A multi-country study on entrepreneurs’ innovative behavior, “Prague Economic Papers” 22: 72-84.
• Łaguna M. (2008), Szkolenia, Gdańsk: GWP.
• Łaguna M., Mielniczuk E., Żaliński A., Wałachowska K. (2015), Przywiązanie do organizacji i zaangażowanie w pracę – koncepcje teoretyczne i problemy terminologiczne, „Medycyna Pracy” 66(2): 277–284.
• Madrid H. P., Patterson M. G., Birdi K. S., Leiva P. I., Kausel E. E. (2014), The role of weekly highactivated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behavior: A multilevel and interactional model, “Journal of Organizational Behavior” 35(2): 234–256.
• Makri M., Scandura T. A. (2010), Exploring the effects of creative CEO leadership on innovation in high-technology firms, “Leadership Quarterly” 21: 75–88.
• Mainemelis C., Kark R., Epitropaki O. (2015), Creative Leadership: A Multi-Context Conceptualization, “The Academy of Management Annals” 1: 393–482.
• Messmann G., Mulder R. H. (2014), Exploring the role of target specifi city in the facilitation of vocational teachers’ innovative work behavior, “Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology” 87(1): 80–101.
• Meyer J. P., Allen N. J. (1997), Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application, Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Mokyr J. (2006), Mobility, Creativity, and Technological Development: David Hume, Immanuel Kant and the Economic Development of Europe, w: Kolloquiumsband of the XX. Deutschen Kongresses für Philosophie, red. G. Abel, Berlin, s. 1131–1161.
• Montani F., Odoardi C., Battistelli A. (2012), Explaining the relationships among supervisor support, affective commitment to change, and innovative work behavior: The moderating role of coworker support, “Bollettino di psicologia applicate” 264: 43–57.
• Montani F., Odoardi C., Battistelli A. (2014), Individual and contextual determinants of innovative work bahaviour: Proactive goal generation matters, “Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology” 87(4): 645–670.
• Mumford M. D., Licuanan B. (2004), Leading for innovation: Conclusions, issues, and directions, „Leadership Quarterly” 15: 163–171.
• Myszel K. (2014), Tajemnice rekrutacji. Najlepsze sposoby na sukces w rozmowie kwalifi kacyjnej, Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Helion.
• Nederveen Pieterse A., Van Knippenberg D., Schippers M., Stam D. (2010), Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment, “Journal of Organizational Behavior” 31: 609–623.
• Nęcka E., (2001), Psychologia twórczości, Gdańsk: GWP. Pobrano z http://www.empik.com/psychologia- tworczosci-necka-edward,6866,ksiazka-p
• Niedzielski P. (2011), Innowacyjność, w: Innowacje i transfer technologii. Słownik pojęć, wyd. 3, red. K. B. Matusiak,Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości, s. 119–120.
• Noruzy A., Dalfard V. M., Azhdari B., Nazari-Shirkouhi S., Rezazadeh A. (2013), Relations between transformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: an empirical investigation of manufacturing firms, “The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology” 64(5–8): 1073–1085.
• Odoardi C., Battisteli A., Montani F. (2010), Can goal theories explain innovative work behaviour? The motivating power of innovation-related goals, “Bollettino di psicologia applicate” 261–262 (57): 3–17.
• OECD (2005), Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, wyd. 3, OECD Publishing, Eurostat.
• Oldham G. R., Cummings A. (1996), Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work, “The Academy of Management Journal” 39: 607–634.
• Pomykalski A. (2001), Zarządzanie innowacjami, Warszawa: PWN.
• Qu R., Janssen O., Shi K. (2015), Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The mediating role of follower relational identifi cation and the moderating role of leader creativity expectations, “The Leadership Quarterly” 26: 286–299.
• Ryan M. R., Deci E. L. (2000), Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being, “American Psychologist” 55: 68–78.
• Salanova M., Llorens S., Schaufeli W. B. (2011), “Yes, I can, I feel good, and I just do it!” On gain cycles and spirals of effi cacy beliefs, affect, and engagement, “Applied Psychology” 60(2): 255–285.
• Sawyer R. K. (2008), Group genius: The creative power of collaboration, New York: Basic Books.
• Scott S. G., Bruce R. A. (1994), Determinants of innovative work behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace, “Academy of Management Journal” 38: 1442–1465.
• Schumpeter J. A. (1960), Teoria rozwoju gospodarczego, tłum. J. Grzywicka,Warszawa: PWN.
• Staw B., Sutton R. I., Pelled S. H. (1994), Employee positive emotions and favorable outcomes at the workplace, “Organization Science” 5: 51–71.
• Stawasz E., Niedbalska G. (2011), Innowacje, w: Innowacje i transfer technologii. Słownik pojęć, wyd. 3., red. K. B. Matusiak, Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości, s. 111–112.
• Strzałecki A., Lizurej A. (red.) (2011), Innowacyjna przedsiębiorczość: Teorie, badania, zastosowania praktyczne. Perspektywa psychologiczna, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Academica.
• Tabak F., Barr S. H. (1996), Adoption of Organizational Innovations: Individual and Organizational Determinants, “Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings” 388–392.
• Taggar S. (2002), Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model, “Academy of Management Journal” 45(2): 315–330.
• Towse R. (2010), Creativity, copyright and the Creative Industries Paradigm, “Kyklos” 63: 461-478.
• Tripp S. D., Bichelmeyer B. (1990), Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy, “Educational Technology Research and Development” 38(1): 31–44.
• Uhlaner L., Lukes M. (2010), The entrepreneurial process: An introduction to psychology of entrepreneurship, [w:] Entrepreneurship: A psychological approach, Prague: Oeconomica, red. M. Lukes, M. Łaguna, s. 1–15.
• UNDP, UNESCO (2013), Creative Economy Report 2013 Special Edition. Widening Local Development Pathways, New York and Paris: United Nations Development Program / United Nations Educational, Scientifi c and Cultural Organization.
• West M. A., Farr J. L. (1990), Innovation at Work, w: Innovation and Creativity at Work, red. M. A. West, J. L. Farr, Wiley: Chichester, s. 3–13.
• Woodman R. W., Sawyer J. E., Griffi n R. W. (1993), Toward a theory of organizational creativity, “The Academy of Management Review” 18: 293–321.
• Woźniak J. (2015), Grywalizacja w zarządzaniu ludźmi, „HRM Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi” 2: 7–15.
• Wu C.-H., Parker S. K., de Jong J. P. J. (2014), Need for cognition as an antecedent of individual innovation behavior, “Journal of Management” 40(6): 1511–1534.
• Viniarski-Peretz H., Carmeli A. (2011), Linking Care Felt to Engagement in Innovative Behaviors in the Workplace: The Mediating Role of Psychological Conditions, “Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts” 1: 43–53.
• von Hippel E. (2005), Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Xerri M., Brunetto Y. (2011), Fostering the Innovative Behaviour of Sme Employees: A Social Capital Perspective, “Research & Practice in Human Resource Management” 19(2): 43–59.
• Yuan F., Woodman R. W. (2010), Innovative behavior in the workplace: the role of performance and image outcome expectations, “Academy of Management Journal” 53(2): 323–342.