The Distribution of the Perfect Auxiliaries be/have in Middle English Texts

• Authors: Zdziera Katarzyna Alicja

Abstracts

Like many Germanic languages, English has developed specific periphrastic constructions to express perfective meaning. Before being fully grammaticalized in the 16th century, they were used occasionally in Old and Middle English as complex verb phrases with either habban ‘to have’ or beon/wesan ‘to be’ acting as auxiliary verbs. By the Modern English period, forms created with be disappeared from the language and were almost completely replaced by forms with have, a process which did not occur, for instance, in German. As the data on this development are quite scarce, a relatively simple model is assumed with a steady diachronic progress towards the system established in Modern English, a model which disregards synchronic variation. This paper attempts to investigate the distribution of the perfective constructions with be and have, especially in the 15th century texts and to identify the main factors accounting for diff erences in their usage. Instead of taking into account only the diachronic aspect of the development described, the present study focuses mainly on investigating the synchronic variation in the auxiliaries used with the two most frequent verbs of motion, namely come and go in the perfective meaning.

Keywords

EN

Middle English; auxiliaries; distribution

• Publisher: Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw
• Journal: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 27/2
• Pages: 33-46

Contributors

author

Zdziera Katarzyna Alicja

• University of Warsaw

References

• Anthony, Laurence. 2012. AntConc (Version 3.2.4w) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
• Brinton, Laurel. 1988. The Development of English Aspectual Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Carey, Kathleen. 1994. “The Grammaticalization of the Perfect in Old English: An Account Based on Pragmatics and Metaphor.” Perspectives on Grammaticalization (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109). Ed. William Pagliuca. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company: 103–117.
• Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Denison, David. 1993. English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London and New York: Longman.
• Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoff rey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kirchner, Gustav. 1941. “The Road to Standard English: Two More Cases in Point, ‘The Conclusive perfect’ and ‘To be for + -ing.’” English Studies 23: 143–153.
• Kytö, Merja. 1997. “Be/have + Past Participle: The Choice of the Auxiliary with Intransitives from Late Middle to Modern English.” English in Transition: Corpus-based Studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles. Ed. Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö, and Kirsi Heikkonen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 19–85.
• Łęcki, Andrzej. 2010. Grammaticalisation Paths of Have in English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
• Markus, Manfred., ed. 2008. Innsbruck Corpus of Middle English Prose. Innsbruck: University of Innsbruck (CD-ROM).
• McFadden, Thomass, and Artemis Alexiadou. 2006. “Auxiliary Selection and Counterfactuality in the History of English and Germanic.” Comparative Studies in Germanic Syntax: From Afrikaans to Zurich German. Ed. Jutta Hartmann, and László Molnárfi . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 237–262.
• Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Perlmutter, David M. 1978. “Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 4: 157–189.
• Rydén, Mats, and Sverker Brorström. 1987. The Be/Have Variation with Intransitives in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
• Sorace, Antonella. 2000. “Gradients in Auxiliary Selection with Intransitive Verbs.” Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 76: 859–890.
• Visser, Fredericus Theodorus. 1963–1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: Brill.