Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 11 | 427-447

Article title

Is God nothingness or blackness? – literature as a platform for integration of religious discourse(s) and the discourse of (natural) sciences

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

PL DE EN

Abstracts

EN
The aim of the paper is to show how conceptual metaphors and metonymies, combined with other factors, enable literature to integrate specialized discourses, in accordance with the theory of Jürgen Link (1983) and his notion of interdiscourse (ger. Interdiskurs). We posit that in our research material, i.e. selected poems and lyrics, elements of two kinds of religious discourses – the discourse of Christian apologetics and atheist or anttheist discourse – are linked together with the elements of the discourse of (natural) sciences, especially with a view to enhancing the e ectiveness of persuasion. As the method of analysis the DIMEAN (linguistic multi-level discourse analysis) model (Warnke/ Spitzmüller 2008) is used, which has hitherto been applied almost exclusively to analyse German-language discourse.

Contributors

References

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981): The Dialogic Imagination. Austin.
  • Celan, Paul (1970): Psalm. In: Stein, Oswald (ed.): Literatur. Bd. 1. Dichterische Texte. Frankfurt am Main.
  • Freeman, Margaret H. (2000): Poetry and the scope of metaphor: Toward a cognitive theory of literature. In: Barcelona, Antonio (eds.): Metaphor and Metonymy at the crossroads. Berlin/New York, pp. 253-281.
  • Freeman, Margaret H. (2006): Art, science, and Ste. Emilie’s sunsets: a Hajinspired cognitive approach to translating an Emily Dickinson poem into Japanese. In: Style 40.1-2, pp. 109-127.
  • Greene, Brian (2011): Nothingness: Why nothing matters. In: New Scientist 2839, online: http:// www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228391.300-nothingness-why-nothing-matters.html(29.12.2012).
  • Jäger, Margarete/ Jäger, Siegfried (2010): Wie kritisch ist die Kritische Diskursanalyse? In: Lipczuk, Ryszard/ Schiewe, Jürgen/ Westphal, Werner/ Misiek, Dorota (eds.): Diskurslinguistik – Systemlinguistik. Theorien – Texte – Fallstudien. Hamburg, pp. 23-29.
  • Jäger, Siegfried/ Maier, Florentine (2009): Theoretical and methodological aspects of Foucaldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. In: Wodak, Ruth/ Meyer, Michael (eds.): Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London, pp. 34-61.
  • Jones, Patrick (2007): christmas lights in january. In: Jones, Patrick (ed.), fuse. Cardigan, pp. 42-43.
  • Jones, Patrick (2008): 10 Million Christs: http://www.myspace.com/patrickjoneswriter/blog(16.02.2013).
  • Jones, Patrick (2009): moment of light: In: Jones, Patrick. tongues for a stammering time (CD). Anhrefn Records; online: http://www.patrickjones.net/section182120_56725.html(16.02.2013).
  • Lakoff, George/Johnson, Mark (1980): Metaphors we live by. Chicago.
  • Lakoff, George (1993): The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In: Ortony, Andrew (ed.): Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, pp. 202-251.
  • Lakoff, George (1990): The Invariance Hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image schemas? In: Cognitive Linguistics 1-1, pp. 39-74.
  • Langacker, Ronald W. (2006): Subjecti cation, grammaticization, and conceptual archetypes. In: Athanasiadou, Angaliki et al. (eds.): Subjecti cation. Berlin, pp. 17-40.
  • Link, Jürgen (1983): Elementare Literatur und generative Diskursanalyse. München.
  • Link, Jürgen/ Link-Heer, Ursula (1990): Diskurs / Interdiskurs und Literaturanalyse. In: Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 77, pp. 88-99.
  • Link, Jürgen (interview with Diaz-Bone, Rainer) (2006): Operative Anschlüsse: Zur Entstehung der Foucaultschen Diskursanalyse in der Bundesrepublik. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Volume 7, No. 3, Art. 20, pp. 1-17.
  • Münkler, Marina (2011): Narrative Ambiguität. Göttingen.
  • Radden, Günter (2000): How metonymic are metaphors? In: Barcelona, Antonio (ed.): Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. Berlin/New York, 93-107.
  • Ribeiro, Branca Telle/ Hoyle, Susan M. (2009): Frame analysis. In: Brisard, Frank/ Östman, Jan Ola/ Verschueren, Jef (eds.): Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, pp. 74-90.
  • Schnurre, Wolfdietrich (1970): Gospel. In: Stein, Oswald (ed.): Literatur. Bd. 1. Dichterische Texte. Frankfurt am Main, p. 17.
  • Schrödinger, Erwin (1935): Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. In: Naturwissenschaften, 23. Jahrgang, Heft 48, pp. 807-812.
  • Semino, Elena (1997): Language and world creation in poems and other texts. London and New York.
  • Spitzmüller, Jürgen (2010): Wege zum Diskurs. Methodische und methodologische Überlegungen zur diskurslinguistischen Praxis. In: Lipczuk, Ryszard/ Schiewe, Jürgen/ Westphal, Werner/ Misiek, Dorota (eds.): Diskurslinguistik – Systemlinguistik. Theorien – Texte – Fallstudien. Hamburg, 53-74.
  • Steen, Gerard J. (2002): Identifying Metaphor in Language: a cognitive approach. In: Style 36.3, pp. 386-406.
  • Steen, Gerard J. (2007): Finding Metaphor in Discourse: Pragglejaz and Beyond. In: Cultura, Lenguaje y Representatión/ Culture, Language and Representation 5, pp. 9–25.
  • Unamuno, Miguel (de) (1959): La oración del ateo. In: de Cossío, José María (ed.): Antología poética. Madrid, p. 59.
  • Warnke, Ingo H./ Spitzmüller, Jürgen (2008): Methoden und Methodologie der Diskurslinguistik – Grundlagen und Verfahren einer Sprachwissenschaft jenseits textueller Grenzen. In: Warnke, Ingo H./ Spitzmüller, Jürgen (eds.): Methoden der Diskurslinguistik. Berlin/New York, pp3-54.
  • Welch, Florence/ Summers, Isabella (2011): No light, no light. In: Florence and the machine. Ceremonials (CD). Universal Island Records.
  • Werth, Paul (1994): Extended metaphor – a text-world account. In: Language and Literature 3 (2), pp. 79-103.
  • Wire, Nicky (2010): Some kind of Nothingness. In: Manic Street Preachers. Postcards from a young man (CD). Sony Music Entertainment UK Ltd.
  • Wu, Jianguo (2011): Understanding Interdiscursivity: A Pragmatic Model. In: Journal of Cambridge Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2-3, pp. 95-115.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-292d6b85-4275-408f-86e7-f930cf5591a5
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.