Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2019 | 7 | 1-19

Article title

Actors And Motivators In Open Innovation Platforms

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The way innovation is know has started to change, shifting from a closed to an open approach. Open innovation has been creating new ways of working in innovation ecosystems, giving the actors more opportunities to obtain new tools, knowledge and more benefits by collaborating with other actors involved in the same network. These innovation ecosystems have their support on innovation platforms, which have different rules and protocols that describe the way interaction should take place. Based on this, this work is motivated in knowing why actors would participate in open innovation platforms. The approach for this paper is to define the motivators and interests of the actors – Government, Businesses and Universities – in their participation in open innovation platforms, as well as to represent how this can benefit them. A case is presented in which the motivators and actors are related in an ecosystem, indicating how they take advantage of the knowledge and resources in it.

Journal

Year

Issue

7

Pages

1-19

Physical description

References

  • Adner Ron (2006), Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem, Harvard business review, 84[4], 98.
  • Akaka Melissa, Vargo Stephen (2014), Technology as an Operant Resource in Service [Eco] Systems, Information Systems and E-Business Management 12: 367–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-013-0220-5
  • Antikainen Maria, Ahonen Mikko (2010), Motivating and Supporting Collaboration in Open Innovation, European Journal of Innovation Management, 21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061011013258
  • Aris Norma, (2007), SMES: Building Blocks for Economic Growth, Department of Statistics Malaysia.
  • Autio Erkko, Thomas Llewellyn (2014), Innovation ecosystems, The Oxford handbook of innovation management, 204-288. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.013.012
  • Balaji M. S., Kumar Roy, S. (2017), Value co-creation with Internet of things technology in the retail industry, Journal of Marketing Management, 33[1-2], 7-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1217914
  • Battistella Cinzia, Felice De Toni Alberto, Pessot Elena, (2017), Practising Open Innovation: A Framework of Reference, Business Process Management Journal 23: 1311–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2016-0219
  • Bughin Jacques, Chui Michael, Johnson Brad (2008), The next step in open innovation, The McKinsey Quarterly, 4[6], 1-8.
  • Carayannis Elias G., Campbell David F.J. (2012), Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems, In Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems [pp. 1-63]. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0
  • Chaminade Chaminade, Edquist Charles (2006), From theory to practice: the use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy, Innovation, science, and institutional change, 141-160.
  • Cheng Collin C. J., Huizingh Eelko K. R. E. (2014), When is Open Innovation Beneficial? The Role of Strategic Orientation, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31[6], 1235-1253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12148
  • Chesbrough Henry W. (2006), Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business Press.
  • Chesbrough Henry W., Appleyard Melissa M. (2007), Open Innovation and Strategy, California Management Review, 50[1], 57-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166416
  • Chesbrough Henry W., Kardon Adrienne C. (2006), Beyond High tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries, R&D Management, 36[3], 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
  • Etzkowitz Henry (2011), The Triple Helix of University - Industry – Government, Science Policy Institute, 18.
  • European Commission (2009), European innovation scoreboard 2009, Brussels: European Commission
  • Feld Brad (2012), Startup communities: building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119204459
  • Fuerlinger George, Fandl Ulrich, Funke Thomas (2015), The role of the state in the entrepreneurship, Triple Helix, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-014-0015-9
  • Gawer Annabelle, Cusumano Michael A. (2014), Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management 31: 417–33 https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105
  • Gronum Sarel, Verreynne Martie-Louise, Kastelle Tim (2012), The Role of Networks in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Innovation and Firm Performance, Journal of Small Business Management, 50[2], 257-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00353.x
  • Harrison Teresa M., Pardo Theresa A., Cook Meghan (2012), Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda. University of Albany, 29.
  • Holbrook Morris B. (1987), What is consumer research?, Journal of Consumer Research, 14[1], pp.128-132. https://doi.org/10.1086/209099
  • Iansiti Marco, Levien Roy (2004), The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability, Harvard Business Press.
  • Lathrop Daniel, Ruma Laurel (2010), Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice, O'Reilly Media, Inc.
  • Lee Gwanhoo, Kwak Young Hoon (2011), An Open Government Implementation Model: Moving to Increased Public Engagement, IBM Center for The Business of Government, 37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037598
  • Lusch Robert F., Nambisan Satish (2015), Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective, MIS quarterly, 39[1], 155-175. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.07
  • Lusch Robert, Nambisan Satish (2015), Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective, MIS Quarterly 39: 155–76. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.07
  • Markkula Markku, Kune Hank (2015]), Making smart regions smarter: smart specialization and the role of universities in regional innovation ecosystems, Technology Innovation Management Review, 5[10]. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview932
  • Maurer Christiane, Valkenburg Rianne (2014), Approaches to a Networked Innovation, International Journal of Innovation & Technology Management, 11[1], 144004[1-18]. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877014400045
  • Ahn Joon M., Ju Yonghan, Moon Tae H., Minshall Timothy, Probert David, Sohn So Y., Mortara Letizia (2016), Beyond absorptive capacity in open innovation process: the relationships between openness, capacities and firm performance, Technology, Analysis & Strategic Management, 28[9], 1009-1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1181737
  • Moeliodihardjo Bagyo Y., Soemardi Biemo W., Brodjonegoro Satryo S., Hatakenaka Sachi (2012), University, industry, and government partnership: Its present and future challenges in Indonesia, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.468
  • Nyman Göte S. (2015), University-business-government collaboration: from institutes to platforms and ecosystems, Triple Helix, 2[1], 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-014-0014-x
  • Perkmann Markus, Walsh Kathryn (2007), University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9[4], 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
  • Rayna Thierry, Striukova Ludmila, Darlington John (2015), Co-Creation and User Innovation: The Role of Online 3D Printing Platforms, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 37: 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.07.002
  • Rayna Thierry, Striukova Ludmila (2015), Open Innovation 2.0: Is Co-Creation the Ultimate Challenge?, International Journal of Technology Management 69: 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2015.071030
  • Rohrbeck René, Hölzle Katharina, Gemuenden Hans G. (2009), How Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem, R&D Management, 39[4], 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00568.x
  • Romero David, Molina Arturo (2009), Value Co-Creation and Co-Innovation: Linking Networked Organisations and Customer Communities, In , 401–12. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04568-4_42
  • Sedera Darshana, Lokuge Sachithra, Grover Varun, Sarker Suprateek, Sarker Saonee (2016), Innovating with Enterprise Systems and Digital Platforms: A Contingent Resource-Based Theory View, Information & Management 53: 366–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.01.001
  • Spitoven Andre, Vanhaverbeke Wim, Roijakkers Nadine (2012), Open Innovation Practices in SMEs and large enterprises, Small Business Economics, 41[3], 537-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9453-9
  • Storbacka Kaj, Roderick J. Brodie, Böhmann Tilo, Maglio Paul P., Nenonen Suvi (2016), Actor Engagement as a Microfoundation for Value Co-Creation, Journal of Business Research 69: 3008–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.034 41. Van de Vrande Vareska, de Jong Jeroen P. J., Vanharvebeke Wim, de Rochemont Maurice (2009), Open Innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges, Elsevier Technovation, 29, 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
  • Vargo Satish L., Lusch Robert F. (2006), Service-dominant logic. The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions.
  • Whitmer Ali, Ogden Laura, Lawton John, Sturner Pat, Groffman Peter M. (2010), The engaged university: providing a platform for research that transforms society, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8[6], 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1890/090241
  • Zinser Richard, Lawrenz Frances (2004), New roles to meet industry needs: A look at the Advanced Technological Education program, Journal of Vocational Education Research, 29[2], 85-99. https://doi.org/10.5328/JVER29.2.85

Document Type

Publication order reference

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-2aebeb0d-3034-4f78-b3f2-b1d734afdedc
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.