Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | 2(8) | 216-232

Article title

Burden of Proof: Standard of Proof in Court Proceeding. Latvian Experience

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

PL EN

Abstracts

PL
Ciężar dowodu: stopień dowodu w postępowaniu sądowym. Doświadczenia Łotwy

Contributors

  • Baltic International Academy, Latvia

References

  • Administrative Liability Law. Law of Republic of Latvia. October 25, 2018. in effect since 01.07.2020. Latvijas vēstnesis, 225.
  • Administrative procedure law. Law of Republic of Latvia. October 25, 2001. in effect since 02.01.2004. Latvijas Vēstnesis No. 164.
  • Baumbach A., Lauterbach W. Albers J., Hartmann P. 2007. Kommentar zur ZPO. 65. Munich: Auflage.
  • Bērziņš M. 2003. “Objektīvās izmeklēšanas princips Administratīvā procesa likumā [Objective investigation principle in Administrative procedure law].” Likums un tiesības [Law and Rights] 6(46).
  • Briede Jautrīte (ed.). 2008. Administrative process in court. Group of authors. Riga: Latvijas Vēstnesis.
  • Briede Jautrīte (ed.). 2013. Commentaries of Administrative procedure law. Part A and B. Riga: Tiesu namu aģentūra.
  • Briede Jautrīte. 2004. “The form and components of an administrative act: Article 67 of the Administrative Procedure Law.” Jurista vārds 6 (311).
  • Civil procedure law. Law of Republic of Latvia. October 14, 1998, in effect since 03.01.1999. Latvijas Vēstnesis No. 326/330.
  • Commercial Law. Law of Republic of Latvia. April 13, 2000. in effect since 01.01.2002. Latvijas Vēstnesis 158/160.
  • Criminal procedure law. Law of Republic of Latvia. April 21, 2005. in effect since 10.01.2005. Latvijas Vēstnesis No. 74.
  • European Convention on Human Rights. International Convention. November 4,1950, in effect in Republic of Latvia since 06.27.1997. Latvijas Vēstnesis No. 143/144.
  • European Court of Human Rights judgment in the case “J.J. v. Netherlands”.
  • European Court of Human Rights judgment in the case No. 28168/95 “Quadrelli v. Italy”.
  • European Court of Human Rights judgement in the case No. 62543/00 “Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain”.
  • European Court of Human Rights judgment in the case Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain No. 10590/83.
  • European Court of Human Rights judgment in the case Geerings v. the Netherlands No. 30810/03.
  • European Court of Human Rights judgment in the case No. 35376/97 “Krčm and Others v. Czech Republic”.
  • European Court of Human Rights judgment in the case O’Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom No. 15809/02 and 25624/02.
  • Fleming James Jr.1961. “Burdens of Proof.” Virginia Law Review 47(1): 51-70.
  • Judgement of Administrative regional court in a case No. 142283512.
  • Judgement of Criminal case court collegium of Kurzeme regional court in case No.120008116.
  • Judgement of Vidzeme county court of city of Riga in case No. 130062316.
  • Judgment of the Administrative Affairs Department of the Senate of the Republic of Latvia of July 5, 2019 in case No. A420157717, SKA-591/2019.
  • Judgment of the Administrative Affairs Department of the Senate of the Republic of Latvia of August 30, 2005 in case No. SKA-207.
  • Judgment of the Administrative Affairs Department of the Senate of the Republic of Latvia of May 10, 2005 in case No. SKA-116.
  • Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Latvia of June 20, 2002 in case No. 2001-17-0106.
  • Judgment of the Department of Administrative Affairs of the Senate of the Republic of Latvia of October 18, 2019 No. SKA-42/2019 (A420249614).
  • Judgment of the Department of Civil Affairs of the Senate of the Republic of Latvia of January 27, 2022, Case No. C69332520, SKC-175/2022.
  • Labour Law. Law of Republic of Latvia. June 20, 2001. in effect since 01.06.2002. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 105.
  • Law “On Judicial Power”. Law of Republic of Latvia. December 15, 1992., in effect since 01.01.1993. Ziņotājs No. 1/2.
  • Levits E. On the place and functions of the administrative process in the Latvian legal system. Jurista vārds, 1998, March 19, No. 10/11 (78/79)
  • Līcis Aivara. 2003. Prasības tiesvedība un pierādījumi [Claims proceedings and evidence]. K.Torgāna (ed.) Riga: TNA.
  • Munday Roderick. 2005. Evidence.Third Edition. Oxford University Press.
  • Nestrova Irēna. 2013. Right against self-incrimination in criminal proceedings Promotion paper. Defended doctoral thesis. Riga. In: https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/bitstream/handle/7/5200/34504-
  • Promocijas_darbs_IrenaNesterova_08112013.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Ose Daina. 2013. Evidence and proving in civil procedure. Promotion paper. Defended doctoral thesis. Riga. In: http://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/bitstream/handle/7/5139/23437-Daina_Ose_2013.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Ose Daina. 2015. The process of proof and its exceptions in civil proceedings. Jurista vārds.15.12.2015 / Nr. 49 (901). In: https://juristavards.lv/doc/267763-pieradisanas-processun-ta-iznemumi-civilprocesa/#ats_2
  • Paine Francs Jozefs. 2002.Vācijas vispārīgās administratīvās tiesības [Germany general administrative law]. Rīga: Tiesu namu aģentūra.
  • Salenieks Normunds. 1998. Par administratīvo procesu tiesā [About the administrative proces in court]. Jurista Vārds, March 19, 1998, No. 10/11.
  • The Constitution of Republic of Latvia. Law of Republic of Latvia. February 15, 1922. in effect since 11.07.1922. Latvijas Vēstnesis No. 43.
  • The Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia Generalization of case law: Principle of objective investigation - interpretation and application. 2005.
  • Višķere Ieva, Savina Santa. 2020. Administratīvā akta pamatojuma maiņas aizliegums [Prohibition of changing the grounds of the administrative act]. Jurista vārds, 15.12.2020, No. 50 (1160).

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
2450-5005

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-467cc42a-49a9-482f-9f8a-9e538ecd2315
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.