London’s Suffragettes, Votes for Women, and Fashion

• Authors: Kociołek Katarzyna

Abstracts

Suffragettes’ militant campaigns for voting rights are commonly dissociated from fashion, yet, in fact clothing and accessories were widely used by Emmeline Pankhurst and her fellow activists to gain visibility and increase public support for the suffrage movement. As commented by Katrina Rolley (1990), the suffragettes were frequently confronted with unfavourable representation of themselves in the press. Yet, thanks to their distinctive use of fashion, as observed by Paula Bartley (2002), the so called “Coronation Procession” held on 17 June 1911 in London was “one of the most colourful and spectacular of all the women’s suffrage demonstrations” (122‒123). Because there is little research on the importance of fashion in public space and the relationship between fashion and the women’s movement, the objective of the article is to show how sartorial practices of suffragettes countered their negative representation in the press. By applying elements of Cognitive Metaphor Theory to selected political cartoons by William Kerridge Haselden in the Daily Mirror, and fashion advertisements in Votes for Women magazine, the article demonstrates that the suffragettes used fashion in order to both increase their public visibility and to conform to normative femininity.

Keywords

EN

W.K. Haselden; comics; fashion; suffragettes,; “Coronation Procession”; Cognitive Metaphor Theory

• Publisher: Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw
• Journal: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 27/1
• Pages: 81-95

Contributors

author

Kociołek Katarzyna

• University of Warsaw

References

• Barthes, Roland. 2013. The Language of Fashion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
• Bartley, Paula. 2002. Emmeline Pankhurst. London and New York: Routledge.
• Crane, Diana. 2000. Fashion and Its Social Agendas. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Crawford, Elizabeth. 2003. The Women’s Suff rage Movement: A Reference Guide 1866‒1928. London: Routledge.
• Entwistle, Joanne. 2000. The Fashioned Body. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Forceville, Charles. 2006. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London, New York: Routledge.
• Haselden, William Kerridge. 1910. “Eff ect s of ‘votes for women.’” Daily Mirror (15 December). https://www.cartoons.ac.uk/search/cartoon_item/subjects_text%5B%5D=suff ragettes
• Haselden, William Kerridge. 1913. “Female heroism in ancient and modern times [on reverse].” Daily Mirror (27 February). https://www.cartoons.ac.uk/search/cartoon_item/subjects_text%5B%5D=suff ragette
• Haselden, William Kerridge. 1907. “The revolt of the dove.” Daily Mirror (15 April). https://www.cartoons.ac.uk/search/cartoon_item/subjects_text%5B%5D=suff ragettes,
• Kaiser, Susan B. 2013. Fashion and Cultural Studies. London: Bloomsbury.
• König, Anna. 2006. “Glossy Words: An Analysis of Fashion Writing in British Vogue.” Fashion Theory 10. 1/2: 205‒224.
• Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
• Montz, Amy L. 2012. “‘Now she’s all hat and ideas’: Fashioning the British Suff rage Movement.” Critical Studies in Fashion and Beauty 3. 1 & 2: 55‒67.
• Pankhurst, Emmeline. 1914. My Own Story. London: Eveleigh Nash. Project Gutenberg.
• Roach, Mary Ellen, and Joanne Bubolz Eicher. 2007. “The Language of Personal Adornment.” Fashion Theory. A Reader. Ed. Malcolm Barnard. London: Routledge. 109‒121.
• Rolley, Katrina. 1990. “Fashion, Femininity and the Fight for the Vote.” Art History 13. 1 : 47‒70.
• Votes for Women. https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=IMJZBBnUFLgC,