From ESP to CLIL and back again: on linguistic aspects in vocational training

• Authors: Możejko Zbigniew

Title variants

PL

Od ESP do CLIL: w poszukiwaniu językowych aspektów kształcenia zawodowego

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The aim of the paper is to offer a critical comparison of approaches to English language instruction – two CLIL and ESP provision. The theoretical section falls into two parts, each devoted to one of the respective approaches. The latter section of the paper is devoted to linguistic aspects of instruction and bring to the readers’ attention the phenomenon of English as a lingua franca, followed by a presentation of a taxonomy of effective CLIL provision based on research carried out in schools in The Netherlands by Rick de Graaff and collaborators (Graaff et al., 2006, 2007).

PL

Celem niniejszego artykułu jest krytyczne przedstawienie dwóch podejść do nauczania języka angielskiego – nauczanie typu CLIL (czyli zintegrowane nauczanie przedmiotowo-językowe) oraz nauczanie typu ESP (czyli nauczanie języka angielskiego dla celów specjalistycznych). Część teoretyczna podzielona jest na dwie podczęści, z których każda poświęcona jest jednemu podejściu do nauczania. W drugiej części artykułu poświęconej aspektom językowym kształcenia przywołuję cechy języka angielskiego jako języka pomostowego (English as a lingua franca) oraz omawiam taksonomię efektywnego nauczania typu CLIL na podstawie badań przepprzeprowadzonych w szkołach holenderskich przez zespół Ricka de Graaffa (Graaff et al. 2006, 2007)

Keywords

EN

CLIL; Content and Language Integrated Learning; VET; Vocational education and training; ESP; English for Specific Purposes; needs analysis

PL

zintegrowane nauczanie przedmiotowo-językowe; kształcenie zawodowe; język angielski dla celów specjalistycznych; badanie potrzeb

• Publisher: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz – Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji, Radom
• Journal: Edukacja Ustawiczna Dorosłych
• Year: 2020
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 27-37

Contributors

author

Możejko Zbigniew

• University of Warsaw in Warsaw

References

• Abrar-ul-Hassan S. and Fazel I. (2018), English for Specific Purposes. In Liontas, J. (ed.) The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 126–140.
• Ball P. (2009), Does CLIL work? [w:] Hill, D. & Alan, P. (eds.), The Best of Both Worlds?: International Perspectives on CLIL. Norwich Institute for Language Education, Norwich, 32–43
• Ball P. (2011), What is CLIL? www.onstopenglish.com
• Belcher D. (2009), What ESP is and can be: An Introduction, [w:] Belcher, D. (ed) English for Specific Purposes in Theory and Practice. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 1–20
• Benesch S. (1996), Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: An example of a critical approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 723–738.
• Bentley K. (2010), The TKT Course: CLIL Module. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Brown J.D. (2016), Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Routledge, London.
• Carter D. (1983), Some propositions about ESP, The ESP Journal, 2, 131–137.
• Dale L. & Tanner R. (2012), CLIL Activities: A Resource for Subject and Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Dudley-Evans T., & St John, M-J. (1998), Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Dörnyei Z. (2005), The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
• Dörnyei Z. (2009), The L2 motivational self system, [w:] In Dörnyei Z. & Ushioda E. (eds.) Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 9–42.
• European Commission (2003), Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity: An Action Plan 2004–2006, COM(2003) 449 final, Brussels, 25.07.2003, online at http:// ec.europa.eu /education /doc/official/keydoc/actlang/act_lang_en.pdf
• Gillett A. (2018), Is EAP ESP? posted on April 13, 2018 on the blog Using English for Academic Purposes online at http://www.uefap.net/blog/?p=933
• Graaff, R. de, Koopman G.J., and Westhoff G. (2006), Categories and examples of effective CLIL pedagogy for L2 learning. CD-Rom, Utrecht University
• Graaff R. de, Koopman G.J., Anikina Y. & Westhoff G. (2007), An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in content and language integrated learning (CLIL), International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 603–624.
• Hyland K. (2006), English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book, Routledge, London.
• Ikeda M. (2013), Does CLIL work for Japanese secondary school students? Potential for the ‘weak’ version of CLIL, International CLIL Research Journal, 2(1), 31–43.
• Jenkins, J. (2000), The phonology of English as an international language, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Jenkins J. (2005), ELF at the gate: the position of English as a Lingua Franca, Humanizing Language Teaching Magazine, 7(2) online at http://old.hltmag.co.uk/mar05/idea.htm
• Johns A.M. (2001), English for specific purposes (ESP): Tailoring courses to students’ needs – and to the outside world, [w:] Celce-Murcia M. (ed) Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). Heinle, New York, NY, 43–54.
• King M. (2018), Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). In Liontas, J. (ed) The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 547–552.
• Long M. (ed.) (2005a), Second Language Needs Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Long M. (2005b), Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In: Long, M. (ed.) Second Language Needs Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 19–76.
• Marsh D., Maljers A. and Hartiala A.K. (2001), Profiling European classrooms, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla.
• Mehisto P., Marsh D., Frigols M J. (2008), Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning and Multilingual Education. Macmillan, Oxford.
• Możejko Z.P. (2013), Teaching English at the Tertiary Level. A Study on Tokens of Advancedness, Perceptions of Needs and Quality Management. Instytut Anglistyki UW, Warszawa.
• Mukan N., Shyika J. & Shyika O. (2017), The development of bilingual education in Canada, Advanced Education, 8(1), 35–40. DOI: 10.20535/2410-8286.100924
• Robinson P. (1991), ESP Today: a Practitioner’s Guide. Prentice Hall International, Hemel Hempstead.
• Seidlhofer B. (2001), Closing a conceptual gap: the case for a description of English as a lingua franca, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 11, 133–158.
• Seidlhofer B. (2004), Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 209–239.
• Strevens P. (1988), ESP after twenty years: A re-appraisal, [w:] Tickoo M. (ed) ESP: State of the Art. SEAMEO Regional Centre, Singapore, 1–13.
• Waller T.A. (2018), Content-Based Instruction. In Liontas, J. (ed) The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 552–556

Identifiers

ISSN

1507-6563