Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2010 | Tom 1 Nr XV | 43-60

Article title

Od akrostychu do akrokonstrukcji (z historii rosyjskiej poezji wizualnej)

Content

Title variants

EN
From acroverse (acrostic) to acroconstruction (from the history of Russian visual poetry)

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
From time, when verses begun to be written down, sound involuntarily began to be united with the letter, but if to remind hieroglyphic literature, also with the picture. Does not surprise therefore fact, that with the flow of time appeared verses, exclusively adjusted on optic reception. Among them particularly popular fixed itself acrostic - versified compositions, in which certain from the columns of letters, syllables or words created additionally the all words, sentence or opinion. Most often such columns are read from the bottom, from the top, or alternatively, were created by the first or last succeeding letters of the verse, or also could be described through so called middle, that is to say other elements of the verses inside division. In Russian literature acrostic were applied from 17th century. In the former history of literature acrostic did not enroll as the kind of high literature, at least examples we can find in poetry of S. Połocki, W. Brusow, I. Siewierianin, N. Gumilow, B. Pasternak and many other Russian poets. As a consequence of these past methods to the sphere of refined poetry and poetic tricks, and in such state are found up to now. In principle acrostic in this form, in what it still existed, was used up. However in new poetry acrostic can renew itself in the new quality within the framework, for example, of non logical verse. Besides that, the practical use of acrostic has large perspectives. We can suppose, that this form of poetic recording has before itself future in the sphere of dedication, greetings and advertisings.

Year

Volume

Pages

43-60

Physical description

Dates

published
2010-12-01

References

  • Антология русского палиндрома, комбинаторной и рукописной поэзии. 2002. Москва
  • Былинин В.К., А. А. Илюшин. 1989. Начало русского виршеписания. Москва.
  • Бирюков С. Е. 2003. РОКУ УКОР: Поетические начала. Москва.
  • Бирюков С. 2003. Урок первый акростишный. Topos 6 XI.
  • Бонч-Осмоловская Т. 2005. Курс лекций «комбинаторная литература» или определение, изучение и создание литературных текстов, основаных на формальных ограничениях. МФТИ. [online] www.ashtray.ru/main/texts/bonch_course/lecture1.htm
  • Гаспаров М.Л. 2001. Русский стих начала ХХ века в комметнариях. Москва.
  • Лукомникова Г. Г., С.Н. Федина. 2002. Антология русского палиндрома, комбинаторной и рукописной поэзии. Москва.
  • По Э. А. 2002. Лирика. Мн.: Харвест.
  • Поляков Д. 2000. Схима смеха. О финале «Зангези» Хлебникова. Парадигмы: Сб. Работ молодых ученых. Тверь.
  • Смирнов И.П. 1979. «Барокко и опыт поэтической культуры начала ХХ века». Славянское барокко: Историко-культурные проблемы эпохи. Москва.
  • Федин С. Н. 2001. Лучшие игры со словами. Москва.
  • Федин С. Н. 1999. Акростихия слова. Наука и жизнь 9: 81.
  • Федотова О. И. 1990. Сонет серебряного века: Русский сонет конца ХIХ – начала ХХ века. Москва.
  • Чудасов И.В. 2005. «Заметки об акростихе». Введенская сторона 3: 24.
  • Чудасов И. В. От акростихов к акроконструкции, [online] http://rifma.com.ru/Chudasov.htm

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
1427-549X

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-76f06672-083d-4a39-8d46-2259da2a6bf1
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.