POTWIERDŹMY SŁOWA CZYNAMI: PRAWO DO ZABEZPIECZENIA SPOŁECZNEGO I OCHRONY SOCJALNEJ – ARGUMENTY PRZEMAWIAJĄCE ZA NOWĄ KONWENCJĄ MIĘDZYNARODOWĄ

• Authors: Cichon Michael

Title variants

EN

LET US WALK THE TALK: THE RIGHT TO SOCIAL SECURITY AND SOCIAL PROTECTION – THE CASE FOR A NEW INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Prawo człowieka do zabezpieczenia społecznego weszło do prawa międzynarodowego w połowie ubiegłego wieku. W 2012 r. Międzynarodowa Konferencja Pracy poczyniła ostatni krok w kierunku skonkretyzowania tego prawa, przyjmując Zalecenie nr 202 dotyczące minimalnego zakresu ochrony socjalnej. Wkrótce potem, w 2015 r., światowa społeczność narodów przyjęła cele zrównoważonego rozwoju, które zawierają kompleksową agendę ochrony socjalnej. Te dwa instrumenty wspólnie wyznaczają globalne cele w zakresie ochrony socjalnej, dostępne dla wszystkich ludzi. W artykule przedstawiono argumenty za tym, że MOP lub ONZ muszą podjąć kolejny krok i przekształcić „miękkie” instrumenty zaleceń i celów w instrumenty „twarde” oraz opracować nową konwencję w sprawie powszechnego dostępu do przynajmniej minimalnego zakresu ochrony socjalnej, aby stworzyć prawdziwą gwarancję dla prawa do zabezpieczenia społecznego i utrudnić odwrócenie osiągniętego postępu społecznego.

EN

The human right to social security entered into international law in the middle of the last century. In 2012 the International Labour Conference took the latest step towards the concretisation of this right when it adopted its recommendation No. 202 (R202) concerning national fl oors of social protection. Shortly thereafter, in 2015, the global community of nations adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) which contain a comprehensive social protection agenda. Together, these two instruments set clear global objectives of social protection accessible to all people. It is argued here that the ILO or the UN have to take the next step and transform “soft” instruments of recommendation and goals into “hard” ones and develop a new convention on universal access to at least fl oor of social protection to a create true safeguard for the right to social security and make it more diffi cult to reverse achieved social progress.

Keywords

PL

zabezpieczenie społeczne; ochrona socjalna; prawa człowieka; Zalecenie nr 202 dotyczące minimalnego zakresu ochrony socjalnej; konwencje MOP; cele zrównoważonego rozwoju

EN

social security; social protection; human rights; ILO Recommendation No. 202 concerning national fl oors of social protection; ILO conventions; Sustainable Development Goals

• Publisher: Institute of Labor and Social Studies, Warsaw
• Journal: Polityka Społeczna
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 47
• Issue: 1(550)
• Pages: 11-20

Contributors

author

Cichon Michael

• członek Międzynarodowej Rady ds. Opieki Społecznej

References

• Bierbaum M. (2019), Update of the SPF Index, FES, Berlin, forthcoming.
• Bierbaum M., Oppel A., Tromp A., Cichon M. (2016), A Social Protection Floor Index: Monitoring National Social Protection Policy Implementation, A discussion paper Maastricht Graduate School of Governance / UNUMERIT, Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
• Bierbaum M., Schildberg C., Cichon M. (2017), Social protection floor index 2017: Discussion paper: update and country studies, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Global Policy and Development, Berlin.
• Cichon M. (2013), The social protection floors recommendation: Can a fivepage document change the course of social history?, „International Social Se-curity Review”, Vol. 66(3–4), s. 21–43.
• Cichon M. (2018a), Hardly Anyone Is Too Poor to Share – A basic level of social protection is affordable nearly everywhere, „Finance & Development”, Vol. 55(4).
• Cichon M. (2018b), The Social Protection Agenda of the Sustainable Development Goals and Its Fiscal Challenge and Annex: SDGs, Governance, and Outcome Targets Constituting the Social Protection Agenda of the SDGs, w: Handayani S.W. (red.), Asia’s Fiscal Challenge: Financing the Social Protection Agenda of the Sustainable Development Goals, Asian Development Bank, Manilla.
• Cichon M. (2019), From night watchman to keeper of wellbeing: The historical emergence of the concept and the right to social protection, A briefing note, forthcoming, ILO, Bangkok.
• Civil Society Reflection Group on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2018), Spotli-ght on Sustainable Development 2018. Exploring new policy pathways. How to overcome obstacles and contradictions in the implementation of the 2030 Agenda, Beirut / Bonn / Ferney-Voltaire / Montevideo / New York / Penang / Rome / Suva, https://www.2030spotlight.org/sites/default/fi-les/spot2018/Spotlight_2018_web.pdf [dostęp 17.07.2019].
• Deacon B. (2013), Global Social Policy in the Making: Foundations of Social Protection Floor, Policy Press, Bristol.
• FES (2019), From international ivory towers to national realities: The challenge to create national social dialogues for social protection floors, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Berlin, forthcoming.
• Friedman H.S. (2013), Causal Inference and the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs): Assessing Whether There Was an Acceleration in MDG Development Indicators Following the MDG Declaration, Columbia University.
• Global Coalition for the Social Protection Floor (2019), The IIMF’s New Policy Framework on Social Protection – A view from the Global Coalition for Social Protection Floors, http://www.socialprotectionfloorscoalition.org/2019/01/the-imfs-new-policy-framework-on-social-protection/ [dostęp 17.07.2019].
• ILO (2011a), Report VI: Social security for social justice and a fair globalization, Recurrent discussion on social protection (social security), International Labour Conference, 100th Session, Geneva.
• ILO (2011b), Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization, International Labour Conference, 100th Session, Geneva.
• ILO (2011c), Social security and the rule of law, International Labour Conference, 100th Session, Geneva.
• ILO (2012), Social security for all. Building social protection floors and comprehensive social security systems. The strategy of the International Labour Organization, Geneva.
• ILO (2014), Rules of The Game, A brief introduction to International Labour Standards, Revised Edition, Geneva.
• ILO (2015), World Social Protection Report 2014/15, Geneva.
• ILO (2017), Building social protection systems: International standards and human rights instruments, International Labour Office, Geneva.
• Ortiz I., Duran-Valverde F., Urban, S., Wodsak V. (2018), Reversing Pension Privatizations – Rebuilding public pension systems in Eastern Europe and Latin America, ILO, Geneva.
• IMF (2019), A Strategy for IMF Engagement on Social Spending, Policy Paper 19/016, Washington, DC.
• Moldalieva J., Muttaqien A., Muzyamba Ch., Osei D., Stoykova E., Le Thi Quynh N. (2016), Millennium Development Goals (MDGs): Did they change social reality?, MERIT Working Paper 2016–035, United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
• Packard T., Gentilini U., Grosh M., O’Keefe Ph., Palacios R., Robalino D., Santos I. (2019), Protecting All: Risk Sharing for a Diverse and Diversifying World of Work, Human Development Perspectives, World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Schildberg C., Cichon M., red. (2019), From international ivory towers to national realities: The challenge of creating national social dialogues for social protection floors 2019, Friedrich-Ebert--Stiftung, Global Policy and Development, Berlin.
• World Bank (2019), World Development Report 2019: The changing nature of work, Washington, DC.

Identifiers

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0013.8150