Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2020 | 23 | 1(86) | 7-21

Article title

Homo economicus: Part human, part machine

Title variants

PL
Homo economicus: Częściowo człowiek, częściowo maszyna

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
For more than 100 years, homo economicus has been an essential concept in the way that orthodox economics represents the economic agent, construes economic behavior, and presents its insights on economic affairs. Students of economics are taught to think in terms of homo economicus and are reinforced relentlessly as they continue their studies. Orthodox economists claim that their way of thinking is akin to the value-free thinking of physical scientists, but they are mistaken. Orthodox economics is not value-free. It rests firmly on utilitarianism which teaches that human beings have value in terms of their usefulness. We propose a different economics that replaces utilitarianism with personalism which derives from and extends the work of William Waters (economics), R.D. Laing (psychiatry), Walter Ong (human communication), John Paul II and Edith Stein (philosophy and theology), and C.S. Lewis and Gerard Manley Hopkins (literature). We refer to this new economics as personalist economics and the new economic agent as the person of action. Homo economicus is a passive economic agent who selects from the various options available at the moment the one that offers the promise of maximum personal net advantage. The person of action is an active, living, breathing, existential actuality who by acting virtuously in economics is better positioned to achieve his/her final objective in life – human perfection.
PL
Od ponad 100 lat homo economus jest podstawowym pojęciem sposobu, w jaki ekonomia ortodoksyjna przedstawia podmiot gospodarczy, rozumie zachowania gospodarcze i prezentuje swoje spojrzenie na sprawy gospodarcze. Ortodoksyjni ekonomiści twierdzą, że ich sposób myślenia jest podobny do wolnego od oceny myślenia fizyków, ale się mylą. Ortodoksyjna ekonomia nie jest wolna od wartościowania. Opiera się ona mocno na utylitaryzmie, który uczy, że istoty ludzkie mają wartość z punktu widzenia swojej przydatności. Proponujemy inną ekonomię, zastępującą utylitaryzm personalizmem, która wywodzi się i rozszerza prace Williama Watersa (ekonomia), R.D. Lainga (psychiatria), Waltera Onga (komunikacja ludzka), Jana Pawła II i Edyty Stein (filozofia i teologia), a także C.S. Lewisa i Gerarda Manley Hopkinsa (literatura). Tę nową ekonomię nazywamy ekonomią personalistyczną, a nowy podmiot gospodarczy – człowiekiem czynu. Homo economicus jest pasywnym podmiotem gospodarczym, który wybiera spośród różnych dostępnych w danym momencie opcji tę, która oferuje mu obietnicę maksymalnej osobistej korzyści netto. Człowiek czynu jest aktywną, żywą, oddychającą, egzystencjalną rzeczywistością, która działając w ekonomii w sposób moralny, jest lepiej sytuowana do osiągnięcia swojego ostatecznego celu w życiu – ludzkiej doskonałości.

Year

Volume

23

Issue

Pages

7-21

Physical description

Dates

published
2020-06

Contributors

  • Mayo Research Institute, 1217 Dean Chapel Road, West Monroe, Louisiana 71291 USA

References

  • Baseheart, Mary Catherine (1989). “Edith Stein's Philosophy of Woman and of Women's Education,” Hypatia, Volume 4, Number 1, spring, pp. 120-131, available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/3809938?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
  • Bello, Angelo Ales (2003). “The Human Being and its Soul in Edith Stein,” available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302526711_The_Human_Being_and_its_Soul_in_Edith_Stein.
  • Blinder, Alan (2000). “How the Economy Came to Resemble the Model,” Business Economics, Volume XXXV, Number 1, January, pp. 16-35.
  • Carthy, Ian (2008). R.D. Laing, book review, History of Psychiatry, Volume 19, Number 2, June 1, pp. 237-241.
  • Collins, Kenneth (2008). “Joseph Schorstein: R.D. Laing's “Rabbi,” History of Psychiatry, Volume 19, Number 2, June 1, pp. 185-201.
  • Crichton, Paul (2007). “The Divided Self,” British Medical Journal, January 27, p. 211.
  • Crosby, John (2011). “Worthy of Respect: The Personalist Norm,” The Personalist Project, December 14, available at http://www.thepersonalistproject.org/home/print_version/worthy_of_respect_the_personalist_nor m
  • Danner, Peter (2002). The Economic Person: Acting and Analyzing, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 167 pp.
  • Doino, William Jr. (2018). “Edith Stein's Wisdom for a New Century,” The Catholic World Report, August 8, available at https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2018/08/08/edith-steins-wisdom-for-anew-century/.
  • Encyclopaedia Britannica (2018). “Edith Stein,”October 8, available at https://www.britannica.com/print/article/564944.
  • Farrell, Thomas J. (2000). Walter Ong's Contribution to Cultural Studies: The Phenomenology of the Word and I-Thou Communication, Cresskill NY: The Hampton Press, 309 pp.
  • Gaudium et Spes (1965), December 7, available at http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651207_gaudium-etspes_en.html.
  • Haney, Kathleen M. (2018). “Genesis and Beyond: Phenomenological Feminism in St. John Paul II and St. Edith Stein,” in Listening to Edith Stein: Edith Stein's Wisdom for a New Century, A Collection of Essays (Carmelite Studies 12), edited by Kathleen Haney, Washington, DC: ICS Publications, pp. 349-372.
  • Haney, Kathleen M. and Johanna Valiquette (2002). “Woman as Ethical Type,” in Phenomenological Approaches to Moral Philosophy: A Handbook, edited by John J. Drummond and Lester E. Embree, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 451-473.
  • Haney, Lewis H. (1949). History of Economic Analysis, fourth edition, New York: The Macmillan Company, 996 pp.
  • John Paul II [Karol Wojtyla] (1979). The Acting Person, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 369 pp.
  • John Paul II (1981). Laborem Exercens, available at http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp- ii_enc_14091981_laborem-exercens.html.
  • John Paul II (1987). Sollicitudo Rei Socialis, available at http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp- ii_enc_30121987_sollicitudo-rei-socialis.html.
  • John Paul II (1991). Centesimus Annus, available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp- ii_enc_01051991_centesimus-annus_en.html.
  • John Paul II (1998a). “Homily of John Paul II for the Canonization of Edith Stein,” available at http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/homilies/1998/documents/hf_jp- ii_hom_11101998_stein.html .
  • John Paul II (1998b). Fides et Ratio, September 14, available at http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_14091998_fides-et-ratio.html.
  • Laing, R.D. (1965). The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness, reprint, London: Pelican Books, 218 pp.
  • Laing, R.D. (1988). “Did You Used to be RD Laing?” video, Vancouver: Third Mind Productions, available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzieL7_aY94
  • Lebech, Mette (no date). “Why does John Paul II refer to Edith Stein in Fides et Ratio?,” available at http://eprints.maynoothuniversity.ie/3821/1/ML_JP2_Stein.pdf.
  • Lewis, C.S. (1933). Pilgrim's Regress, UK: J.M. Dent and Sons, 256 pp.
  • Listening to Edith Stein: Edith Stein's Wisdom for a New Century, A Collection of Essays (Carmelite Studies 12), edited by Kathleen Haney, Washington, DC: ICS Publications, 2018, 456 pp.
  • Mariani, Paul L. (1970). A Commentary on the Complete Poems of Gerard Manley Hopkins, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 361 pp.
  • Mariani, Paul L. (2008). Gerard Manley Hopkins: A Life, New York: Viking Press, 496 pp.
  • McClellan, Eric (2017). “Edith Stein: Her Empathic Theology of the Human Person,” Pacifica: Australasian Theological Studies, October 27, pp. 20-41, available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1030570X17725919.
  • McGrath, Alister (2013). C.S. Lewis – A Life: Eccentric Genius, Reluctant Prophet, Carol Stream, Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers, 431 pp.
  • Miller, Gavin (2009). “ R.D. Laing and Theology: The Influence of Christian Existentialism on the Divided Self,” History of the Human Sciences, Volume 22, Number 2, pp. 1-21.
  • Miller, Gavin (2012). “R.D. Laing's Theological Hinterland: The Contrast Between Mysticism and Communion,” History of Psychiatry, Volume 23, Issue 90, Pt. 2, June, pp. 139-155.
  • Miller, J. Hillis (1955). “The Creation of Self in Gerard Manley Hopkins,” ELH (English Literary History), Volume 22, Number 4, December, pp. 293-319.
  • Milward, Peter (2002). “Self as Other in Hopkins,” Hopkins Lectures 2002, available at http://www.gerardmanleyhopkins.org/lectures_2002/self_as_other.html.
  • Moran, Edward (c.2015). “Edith Stein: A Theory of Female Personality,” Institute for Psychological Services, available at http://www.academia.edu/12127599/Edith_Steins_Feminine_Personalism.
  • Nitsch, Thomas O. (1990). “Social Economics: The First 200 Years,” in Social Economics: Retrospect and Prospect, edited by Mark A. Lutz. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 5-90.
  • O'Boyle, Edward J. (2005). “John Paul II's Vision of the Social Economy,” International Journal of Social Economics, Volume 32, Number 6, pp. 520-540.
  • O'Boyle, Edward J. (2017) “Schumpeter and Economic Man,” International Journal of Social Economics, Volume 44, Number 1, pp. 141-150.
  • Ong, Walter. (1967). In the Human Grain: Further Explorations of Contemporary Culture, New York: The MacMillan Company, 207 pp.
  • Ong, Walter J. (1981). Fighting for Life: Contest, Sexuality, and Consciousness, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 231 pp.
  • Online Etymology (no date). Online Etymology Dictionary, individual (n.), available at https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=individual.
  • Paterson, Mark W.O. (2005). “Laing, Ronald David (1927-89),” in Dictionary of Twentieth Century British Philosophers, edited by Stuart Brown and Huge Bredin, Briston: Thoemmes Continuum, pp. 535-536.
  • Svenaeus, Fredrik (2018). “Edith Stein's Phenomenology of Sensual and Emotional Empathy,” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Volume 17, pp. 741-760.
  • Ten Eyck, Katrina and Michelle Borras (2014). “Called to Love: John Paul II's Theology of Human Love,” Catholic Information Service. Knights of Columbus, pp. 1-60.
  • Ticktin, Stephen (no date). “Biography,” adapted from a review of R.D. Laing: A Biography, by
  • Adrian Laing, R.D. Laing Institute, available at http://r-d-laing.com/resources/biography/.
  • Titus, C.S., P.C. Vitz, W.J. Nordling (2018). “Theological, Philosophical, and Psychological Premises for a Catholic Christian Meta-Model of the Person,” chapter 2 in Meta-Model of the Person, Institute for Psychological Services, Divine Mercy University, March 19, pdf, 18 pp.
  • Waters, William R. (1952). Entrepreneurship, Dualism, and Causality: An Appreciation of the Work of Joseph A. Schumpeter, doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., 205 pp.
  • Waters, William R. (1988). “Solidarist Economics: A Solidarist Perspective,” Review of Social Economy, Volume XLVI, Number 2, October, pp. 113-143.
  • Waters, William R. (1990). “Evolution of Social Economics in America,” in Social Economics: Retrospect and Prospect, edited by Mark A. Lutz. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 91-117.
  • Young, Bruce (2011). “Self and Other in Lewis and Levinas,” In Pursuit of Truth/A Journal of Christian Scholarship, March 30, available at http://www.cslewis.org/journal/self-andother-in-lewis-and-levinas/view-all/

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
1506-7513

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-8f0083b9-9712-437a-b4c9-53949c480140
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.