Monety z cmentarzyska w Gieczu, stanowisko 4, jako źródło do badań obrzędów funeralnych

• Authors: Indycka Elżbieta

Title variants

EN

Coins from the burial ground in Giecz, site 4, as a source for the research of funeral rituals

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

The article presents the results of the analyses of coins, which were found during excavation works on the early medieval skeleton cemetery in Giecz (site 4). 281 graves were uncovered and examined there, among which were the ones with coins. The conducted archaeological and numismatic analyses refer to funeral rituals, chronology of the burial ground and various cultural phenomena connected with coins. The obtained data indicate that the ritual of depositing coins with the dead at the cemetery located next to the castle-town in Giecz appeared over half century after converting to the new religion and continued for 200 years. On the basis of the conducted analysis it can be stated that the coins were placed with the dead regardless of their sex or age at the moment of death. The deceased were buried in the same way as the majority of the decedents at the burial grounds; their graves did not stand alone. With the exception of the shears, no other special objects were placed in them and no two groups of graves of the same type were registered. Graves with coins, regardless of their orientation as well as sex and age of the individuals buried in them, and regardless of the chronology of the coins which they contained, were placed on the entire burial ground. They were orientated similarly to the majority of graves. The relationship between the type of coin and the grave’s orientation, where the coins were put, was not identified. The complete coins were placed in graves and these included almost exclusively saxon cross coins and princely denars. The custom of placing coins in graves was probably restricted to the elite groups which were in the possession of coins. At the present stage of research one could risk saying that it also showed the bonds connecting members of the family. It is possible that families had their quarters “assigned” at this cemetery, which can be reflected in graves with coins of different chronology located next to each other. The family bonds can also be indicated by the coins minted with the same stamps, which were found in the graves. The archaeological analysis of graves with coins also brought crucial data, which can be pertained to the stages of the functioning of the burial ground. It has been pointed out that in the third decade of the 11th century the custom of placing coins in graves appeared in Giecz. However, it was not prevalent in those days and was probably limited to a small group of the local community which was in the possession of money in the period when the monetary economy had just started to popularize [Łosiński 1991: 251–257]. Presumably the first coins, which were placed in graves of both segments after the incursion of Bretislav, are the cross denars type V, which were first issued in 1060. The research also revealed that in both periods when the burial ground was in use, at least two of its segments were occupied simultaneously. The coins manifested, among other things, power, prestige, wealth and religious content [Kiersnowski 1988: 38; Dzieduszycki 1995: 85–86]. The coins spread, among other ways, through wealth redistribution [Dzieduszycki 1995: 64–69]. The presence of coins in graves — the symbols of wealth and glamour, of which a small piece was placed with a deceased member of the family — despite the absence of other “precious” objects, points to the high social status of both the buried individuals and the contributor. In the research concerning the importance of coins in graves, the iconography of coins attracts attention, especially the religious symbols visible on them [Kiersnowski 1988: 314– 326; 170, 378–379]. Such varied images of a cross and saints can also be found on coins from Giecz. Therefore, it can be assumed that some of the coins were placed with the deceased as a confession of their faith and/or an offering to the Creator. It could be possible that the coins in the youngest children’s graves were their baptism certificate. Only one object from a grave which depicted religious symbols has been identified so far. It was a metal pendant. Its décor presents a miniature Maiestas Crucis, derivative from the pattern known from cards and the covers of Carolingian and Ottonian books [Indycka 2017]. Hence, the coins found in the graves should be included in the group of objects which express the Christian ideology. Diverse aspects of belief in the magic of coins show that the living could have multiple motives for placing coins with the deceased member of the family and community [Miechowicz 2006: 149–153]. Further analyses of the coins minted with the same stamps may lead to the research concerning the origins and distribution of the coins [Paszkiewicz 2015: 237]. The presence of coins in graves, with different periods of emission, brings data concerning the period of their circulation [Suchodolski 2016: 184], as well as their hoarding [Dzieduszycki 1995: 73–78]. The above considerations also point to the family bonds. Due to numismatic and archaeological analyses, the data concerning various cultural phenomena related to coins and funeral rituals and their chronology was obtained. The remarks concerning the usefulness of coins in social analyses, both in the aspect of social hierarchy and family bonds of the Giecz community, are also crucial. However, almost all the issues mentioned in the present article require further interdisciplinary research and profound comparative studies.

Keywords

PL

Giecz; monety; zwyczaje pogrzebowe; wczesnośredniowieczne cmentarzysko; XI–XIII wiek

EN

Giecz; coins; funeral rituals; early medieval burial grounds; 11th–13th century

• Publisher: Muzeum Pierwszych Piastów na Lednicy
• Journal: Studia Lednickie
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 18
• Pages: 207-243

Dates

published

2019

Contributors

author

Indycka Elżbieta

• Muzeum Pierwszych Piastów na Lednicy

References

• Arkuszewski G. 2015. Katalog. Monety orientalne [w:] Monety ze stanowiska nr 4 w Gieczu, red. T. Krysztofiak, A.M. Wyrwa, BSL, t. XXXIII, seria B1, t. 6:2, Lednica, s. 13–57.
• Dzieduszycki W. 1995. Kruszce w systemach wartości i wymiany społeczeństwa Polski wczesnośredniowiecznej, Poznań.
• Indycka E. 2016. Cmentarz przy wczesnośredniowiecznym grodzie w Gieczu [w:] Gród piastowski w Gieczu. Geneza — funkcja — kontekst, red. M. Kara, T. Krysztofiak, A.M. Wyrwa Poznań, s. 209–237.
• Indycka E. 2017. Metalowa płytka z dekoracją ornamentalną (zawieszka?) z cmentarzyska w Gieczu, stanowisko 4 [w:] Gemma Gemmarum. Studia dedykowane Profesor Hannie Kóčce-Krenz, red. A. Różański, Poznań, s. 1215–1236.
• Kiersnowski R. 1988. Moneta w kulturze wieków średnich, Warszawa.
• Kóčka-Krenz H. 1993. Biżuteria północno-zachodniosłowiańska we wczesnym średniowieczu, Poznań.
• Krysztofiak T. 2009. Giecz. Ośrodek przedpaństwowy — wczesnopiastowski gród centralny — ośrodek kasztelański [w:] Custodia Memoriae. Muzeum Pierwszych Piastów na Lednicy, LX lat istnienia (1969–2009), red. A.M. Wyrwa, BSL, t. XIV, seria A, t. 1, s. 111–137.
• Krysztofiak T. 2015 Stanowisko nr 4 w świetle badań archeologicznych [w:] Monety ze stanowiska nr 4 w Gieczu, red. T. Krysztofiak, A.M. Wyrwa, BSL, t. XXXIII, seria B1, t. 6:1, Lednica, s. 17–57.
• Krysztofiak T. 2016 Ośrodek grodowy w Gieczu w okresie przed- i wczesnopaństwowym [w:] Gród piastowski w Gieczu. Geneza — funkcja — kontekst, red. M. Kara, T. Krysztofiak, A.M. Wyrwa, Poznań, s. 115–154.
• Łosiński W. 1991 W sprawie rozwoju gospodarki towarowo-pieniężnej na ziemiach polskich we wczesnym średniowieczu w kontekście dziejów obrotu pieniężnego w strefie nadbałtyckiej. Część II, AP XXXVI, z. 1–2, s. 235–264.
• Miciak M. 2005 Grodzenie na cmentarzysku w Gieczu, woj. wielkopolskie, na tle podobnych cmentarzysk na ziemiach polskich we wczesnym średniowieczu, Poznań [maszynopis pracy magisterskiej w archiwum IA UAM i w bibliotece oddziału MPPL w Gieczu].
• Miciak M. 2017 Cmentarzysko wczesnośredniowieczne w Gieczu, stan. 10. Wstępne wyniki badań, SL XVI, s. 39–59.
• Miechowicz Ł. 2006 Moneta jako przedmiot zabiegów magicznych w świetle źródeł etnograficznych z obszaru Polski, WN, R. L, z. 2 (182), s. 147–158.
• Monety. 2015. Monety ze stanowiska nr 4 w Gieczu, red. T. Krysztofiak, A.M. Wyrwa, BSL, t. XXXIII, seria B1, t. 6, cz. 1–3, Lednica.
• Parker Pearson M. 1999. The archaeology of Death and Burial, Sutton.
• Paszkiewicz B. 2015. Giecz 4 — monety ze „stanowiska wydajnego” [w:] Monety ze stanowiska nr 4 w Gieczu, red. T. Krysztofiak, A.M. Wyrwa, BSL, t. XXXIII, seria B1, t. 6:1, Lednica, s. 233–238.
• Suchodolski S. 1973 Mennictwo polskie w XI i XII wieku, Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków–Gdańsk.
• Suchodolski S. 2016 Obol zmarłych (monety i pieniądz kruszcowy) na cmentarzysku w Dziekanowicach, stan 22 [w:] Nummus bonum fragile est. Groby z monetami wczesnośredniowiecznego cmentarzyska w Dziekanowicach, red. J. Wrzesiński, BSL, t. XXXV, seria B1, t. 7:1, Lednica, s. 157–192.
• Syty M. 2015. Katalog. Monety zachodnioeuropejskie i nowożytne [w:] Monety ze stanowiska nr 4 w Gieczu, red. T. Krysztofiak, A.M. Wyrwa, BSL, t. XXXIII, seria B1, t. 6:2, Lednica, s. 59–312.
• Syty M. 2015. Monety zachodnioeuropejskie i nowożytne [w:] Monety ze stanowiska nr 4 w Gieczu, red. T. Krysztofiak, A.M. Wyrwa, BSL, t. XXXIII, seria B1, t. 6:1, Lednica, s. 77–133 [monety z grobów: 112–120].
• Wrzesiński J. 2016. Archeologia dziekanowickich grobów z monetami [w:] Nummus bonum fragile est. Groby z monetami wczesnośredniowiecznego cmentarzyska w Dziekanowicach, red. J. Wrzesiński, BSL, t. XXXV, seria B1, t. 7:1, Lednica, s. 13–96.
• Wyrwa A.M. 2015. Przedmowa [w:] Nummus bonum fragile est. Groby z monetami wczesnośredniowiecznego cmentarzyska w Dziekanowicach, red. J. Wrzesiński, BSL, t. XXXV, seria B1, t. 7:1, Lednica, s. 7–8.

Identifiers

ISSN

0860-7893