Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2016 | 37 | 1 | 15-25

Article title

Czy tylko apokaliptyka? ΠΑΣΧΩ i ΠΑΘΗΜΑ w kontekście Rz 8 oraz Ga 3

Authors

Content

Title variants

EN
Is it only Apokalyptic? ΠΑΣΧΩ and ΠΑΘΗΜΑ in the Context of Romans 8 and Gal 3.

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
W wielowiekowej historii interpretacji epistolarium Pawłowego, a w szczególności Listów do Galatów i do Rzymian niektórzy autorzy odkrywali, że w obydwu tych pismach znaleźć można wątki apokaliptyczne, albo też wnioskowali apokaliptyczną ich lekturę. Argumentami przemawiającymi za uznaniem takiego stanu rzeczy jest według nich między innymi szata lingwistyczna i obrazowość nawiązująca do pism apokaliptycznych związanych z tradycjami Starego Testamentu. Autor artykułu zwraca uwagę na użycie w listach do Galatów i do Rzymian terminów πάσχω i πάθημα i stawia hipotezę o wykorzystaniu przez św. Pawła w kontekście tych listów toposu teologicznego Exodusu wraz z oprawą medialną apokaliptyki będącej wówczas w modzie metody prezentacji zarówno przesłania wydarzeń dawnych jak i imperatywów płynących z prawdy o pojednaniu z Bogiem.
EN
In the long history of interpreting Pauline epistolarium and, in particular, the Letters to the Galatians and Romans, some authors have discovered that both texts contain apocalyptic motives, or they have postulated their apocalyptic reading. As it has been contended, the main arguments in support of such an interpretation comprise, among other things, the linguistic style as well as imagery drawing on the apocalyptic writings associated with the traditions of the Old Testament. The author of the present article points to the use of terms πάσχω and πάθημα in the letters to the Galatians and Romans and puts forward a hypothesis that in the context of these texts, St. Paul used the theological topos of the Exodus and the means of expression characteristic of apocalyptic which was at the time a popular method of presenting both the meaning of past events and the imperatives arising from the truth about reconciliation with God.

Year

Volume

37

Issue

1

Pages

15-25

Physical description

Dates

published
2016-03-31

Contributors

References

  • Achtemeier, Paul J. 1983. “An Apocalyptic Shift in Early Christian Tradition”. CBQ 45:231-248. Adinolfi, Marco. 1977. “La dialettica indicativo-imperativo nelle lettere paoline”. Antonianum 52:626-646. Aune, David E. 2010. “Apokaliptyka”. in: Słownik Teologii św. Pawła. G. F. Hawthorne – R. P. Martin – D. G. Reid (ed.). Warszawa: Vocatio. 21-30. Baumgarten, Jörg. Paulus und die Apokalyptik. Die Auslegung apokalyptischer Überlieferungen in den echten Paulusbriefen. WMANT 44. Neukirken-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag. Beker, Johann Ch. 1982. Paul's apocalyptic gospel: the coming triumph of God. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press. Bindemann, Walther. 1983. Die Hoffnung der Schöpfung. Römer 8,18-27 und die Frage einer Theologie der Befreiung von Mensch und Natur. Neukirchener Studien 14. Neukirken-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag. Branick, Vincent P. 1985, “Apocalyptic Paul?”. CBQ 47(4):664-675. Buscemi, Alfio M. 2004. Lettera ai Galati. Commentario esegetico. SBF Analecta 63. Jerusalem: Franciscan Printing Press. Cranfield, Charles E. B. 1975 The Epistle to the Romans. ICC. vol. I. Edinburgh: T & T Clark. De Boer, Martinus C. 1989. “Paul and Jewish Apocalyptic Eschatology”, in: J. Marcus – M. L. Soards (ed.), Apocalyptic and the New Testament. Essays in Honor of J. Louis Martyn. JSNT Suppl. 24. Sheffield: 169-190. Dunne, John A. 2013. “Suffering in Vain: A Study of the Interpretation of ΠΑΣΧΩ in Galatians 3,4”. JSNT 36(1):3-16. Dunne, John A. 2015. “Suffering and covenantal hope in Galatians: a critique of the ‘apocalyptic reading’ and its proponents”. Scottish Journal of Theology 68(1):1-15. Fretheim Terrence. 1991. “The Reclamation of Creation: Redemtion and Law in Exodus”. Interpretation 45:356. Gaventa, Beverly R.(ed.). 2013. Apocalyptic Paul: cosmos and anthropos in Romans 5-8, Waco: Baylor University Press. Hahne, Harry A. 2006. The Corruption and Redemption of Creation: Nature in Romans 8:19-22 and Jewish Apocalyptic Literature. The Library of New Testament Studies 336. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Herman, Zvonomir I. 1987. “Saggio esegetico sul 'già e non ancora' soteriologico in Rm 8”. Antonianum 62:26-84. Käsemann, Ernest. 1969. On the Subject of Primitive Christian Apocalyptic, in: Idem, New Testament Questions of Today, Philadelphia: Fortress Press. Martyn, J. Louis. 1997. Galatians. The Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday. Martyn, J. Louis. 2000. “The Apocalyptic Gospel in Galatians”. Interpretation 54(3): 246-266. Matlock, R. Barry. 1996. Unveiling the Apocalyptic Paul. Paul's Interpreters and the Rhetoric of Criticism. JSNTSuppl. 127. Sheffield: Academic Press. Mycielski, Ludwik. 1972. “Apokaliptyczna szata literacka opisów paruzji Chrystusa z listów do Tesaloniczan. Analecta Cracoviensia 4:147-179. Parchem, Marek. 2010. “Wprowadzenie”, in: Idem (ed.), Pisma apokaliptyczne i testamenty. Apokryfy Starego Testamentu 2. Kraków – Mogilany: The Enigma Press: 21-115. Penna, Romano. 2006. Lettera ai Romani. II. Rm 6 – 11. Scritti delle origini cristiane 6/2. Bologna: Dehoniane. Pikor, Wojciech. 2014. “Prorocka interpretacja exodusu. I. Amos, Ozeasz”. Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia 7:41-53. Popowski, Roman. 1985. Imperatiwus na tle indikatiwu w listach Pawła z Tarsu. Studium językowo-egzegetyczne. Lublin: RW KUL. Rossi, Benedetto. 1992. La creazione tra il gemito e la gloria. Studio esegetico e teologico di Rm 8,18-25.Roma: Edizioni Dehoniane. Sailors, Timothy B. 2009. “Der Römerbrief und die 2. (syrische) Baruch-Apokalypse : Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede“. in: U. Schnelle (ed.), The Letter to the Romans. Bibliotheca ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 226. Leuven: 563-594. Schnackenburg, Roman. 1981. Messaggio morale del Nuovo Testamento, Roma. Schweitzer, Albert. 1931. The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle, London: A. & C. Black. Scott, James M. 1992. Adoption as Sons of God: An Exegetical Investigation into the Background of UIOTHESIA in the Pauline Corpus. WUNT 2/48. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Stockhausen, Carol K. 1993. 2 Cor. 3 and the Principles of Pauline Exegesis. in: C. A. Evans – J. A. Sanders (ed.), Paul and the Scriptures of Israel. JSNTSuppl. 83. Sheffield: Academic Press: 143-64. Strecker, Georg. 1987. “Indicative and Imperative according to Paul”. Australian Biblical Review 35:60-72. Wanamaker, Charles A. “Apocalyptic discourse, paraenesis and identity maintenance in 1 Thessalonians”. Neotestamentica 36:131-145.

Document Type

Publication order reference

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-9c02e30a-b07c-4108-8e2f-8c85695ca6f9
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.