Does reading words differing in arousal load influence local vs. global scope of perception?

• Authors: Kamil K. Imbir
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article examines how the arousing properties of words influence the local vs. global scope of perception in the Kimchi–Palmer task. It was assumed that arousal is a stimulus property that influences a person’s mental state. Suboptimal arousal (low or high) was expected to narrow the visual scope in comparison to optimal (moderate) arousal. Words varying in arousal (three levels) and matched for valence, concreteness, frequency of appearance, and length were read by 20 young adults (8 women and 12 men, Mage = 21.85, SD = 1.69). The participants were then asked about their scope of perception using the Kimchi–Palmer task, allowing for differentiation between the priority of processing on local versus global features of compound geometrical figures. The relationship between the arousal level of the words read and the subsequent cognitive scope followed the Yerkes-Dodson law in that stimuli inducing an intermediate arousal level (versus low or high level of arousal inducements) were associated with a broader, more global cognitive scope.

Keywords

EN

word processing; arousal; Kimchi–Palmer task

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
• Journal: Roczniki Psychologiczne
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 22
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 277-297

Contributors

author

Kamil K. Imbir

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

References

• Basso, M. R., Schefft, B. K., Ris, M. D., & Dember, W. N. (1996). Mood and global-local visual processing. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2(03), 249–255. doi: 10.1017/S1355617700001193
• Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Positive affect and flexibility: Overcoming the precedence of global over local processing of visual information. Motivation and Emotion, 29(2), 123–134. doi: 10.1007/s11031-005-7957-1
• Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1998). Anxiety and attentional focusing: Trait, state and hemispheric influences. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(4), 745–761. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00117-2
• Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66(3), 183–201. doi: 10.1037/h0047707
• Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 165–192). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0507
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149. doi: 10.3758/BF03203267
• Finucane, A. M. (2011). The effect of fear and anger on selective attention. Emotion, 11(4), 970–974. doi: 10.1037/a0022574
• Förster, J. (2012). GLOMOsys: The how and why of global and local processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 15–19. doi: 10.1177/0963721411429454
• Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16(8), 631–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x
• Freitas, A. L., Bahar, M., Yang, S., & Banai, R. (2007). Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks. Psychological Science, 18(12), 1040–1043. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02022.x
• Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008). Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention. Psychological Science, 19(5), 476–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02112.x
• Gable, P. A., & Harmon‐Jones, E. (2013). Does arousal per se account for the influence of appetitive stimuli on attentional scope and the late positive potential? Psychophysiology, 50(4), 344–350. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12023
• Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13(1), 34–40. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00406
• Harmon-Jones, E., Gable, P. A., & Price, T. F. (2013). Does negative affect always narrow and positive affect always broaden the mind? Considering the influence of motivational intensity on cognitive scope. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 301–307. doi: 10.1177/0963721413481353
• Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., & Price, T. F. (2013). What is approach motivation?. Emotion Review, 5(3), 291–295. doi: 10.1177/1754073913477509
• Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., & Mewhort, D. J. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.340
• Heerebout, B. T., & Phaf, R. H. (2010a). Good vibrations switch attention: An affective function for network oscillations in evolutionary simulations. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(2), 217–229. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.2.217
• Heerebout, B. T., & Phaf, R. H. (2010b). Emergent oscillations in evolutionary simulations: Oscillating networks increase switching efficacy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(5), 807–823. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21205
• Hofmann, M. J., Kuchinke, L., Tamm, S., Võ, M. L., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Affective processing within 1/10th of a second: High arousal is necessary for early facilitative processing of negative but not positive words. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(4), 389–397. doi: 10.3758/9.4.389
• Huntsinger, J. R. (2013). Does emotion directly tune the scope of attention?. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 265–270. doi: 10.1177/0963721413480364
• Huntsinger, J. R., Clore, G. L., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2010). Mood and global–local focus: Priming a local focus reverses the link between mood and global–local processing. Emotion, 10(5), 722–726. doi: 10.1037/a0019356
• Imbir, K. (2013). Origins and source of emotion as factors that modulate the scope of attention. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 16(2), 287–310.
• Imbir, K. (2015a). Affective Norms for 1,586 Polish Words (ANPW): Duality of mind approach. Behavior Research Methods, 47(3), 860–870. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0509-4
• Imbir, K. (2015b). Does reading words differing in arousal load influence interference control in flanker task? Current Psychology, online first. doi: 10.1007/s12144-015-9396-9
• Imbir, K. (2016a). From heart to mind and back again. A duality of emotion overview on emotion––cognition interactions. New Ideas in Psychology, 43, 39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.04.001
• Imbir, K. (2016b). Affective Norms for 4900 Polish Words Reload (ANPW_R): Assessments for valence, arousal, dominance, origin, significance, concreteness, imageability and age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1081. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01081
• Imbir, K. (2018). Origin of emotion represented in word meaning influences complex visual search effectiveness. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 49(2), 207–220.
• Kazojć, J. (2011). Słownik frekwencyjny języka polskiego[Polish language dictionary of attendance]. Retrieved from http://www.slowniki.org.pl/lista-frekwencyjna.pdf
• Kimchi, R., & Palmer, S. E. (1982). Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(4), 521–535. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.8.4.521
• Kolańczyk, A. (2011). Uwaga ekstensywna. Model ekstensywności vs. intensywności uwagi [Extensive attention. The extensiveness vs. intensiveness of attention model]. Studia Psychologiczne, 49(3), 7–27.
• Kuhbandner, C., & Zehetleitner, M. (2011). Dissociable effects of valence and arousal in adaptive executive control. PloS ONE, 6(12), e29287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029287
• Lang, P. J. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. In J. B. Sidowski, J. H. Johnson, & T. A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp. 119–l 37). Norwood, NJ, US: Ablex.
• McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (2004). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: The role of fast and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 382–392. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.382
• Montefinese, M., Ambrosini, E., Fairfield, B., & Mammarella, N. (2014). The adaptation of the Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW) for Italian. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 887–903. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0405-3
• Moors, A., De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., Wanmaker, S., van Schie, K., Van Harmelen, A. L., . . . Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, dominance, and age of acquisition for 4,300 Dutch words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 169–177. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0243-8
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
• Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 220–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.220
• Osgood, C. E., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL, US: University of Illinois Press.
• Phaf, R. H. (2015). Attention and positive affect: Temporal switching or spatial broadening? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(3), 713–719.
• Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(1), 383–388. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605198104
• Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145
• van der Helm, P. A. (2012). Cognitive architecture of perceptual organization: From neurons to gnosons. Cognitive Processing, 13(1), 13–40. doi: 10.1007/s10339-011-0425-9
• Van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P., & Hommel, B. (2010). In the mood for adaptation: How affect regulates conflict-driven control. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1629–1634.
• Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5), 459–482. doi: 10.1002/cne.920180503

Identifiers

DOI

10.18290/rpsych.2019.22.3-5