Od comitativu do spójnika. O pochodzeniu słowiańskiego spójnika i oraz litewskiego ir

• Authors: Ostrowski Norbert

Title variants

EN

From comitative to conjunction. On the origin of the Slavic conjunction i and Lithuanian ir ‘and; also’

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The paper aims to describe the origin of the Slavic conjunction i ‘and’ and its Baltic counterpart ir ‘and; also’ (Old Prussian ir ‘also’, Lithuanian ‘and; also’, Latvian ‘and; also; even’). Common Baltic ir traces back to the former *ī-r that stems from the conflation of demonstrative pronoun (instr. sg.) *h₁i-h₁ and locative postposition -r. On the basis of Baltic data we can establish the primary character of Slavic i ‘and’ which illustrates the functional change from comitative to coordinative conjunction.

Keywords

PL

etymologia; składnia historyczna; języki bałtyckie i słowiańskie; gramatykalizacja; typologia

EN

etymology; historical syntax; Baltic and Slavic languages; grammaticalization; typology

• Publisher: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Journal: LingVaria : Półrocznik Wydziału Polonistyki UJ poświęcony zagadnieniom języka i językoznawstwa
• Year: 2017
• Issue: 24
• Pages: 165-176

Contributors

author

Ostrowski Norbert

References

• Ambrazas V., 2006, Lietuvių kalbos istorinė sintaksė, Vilnius.
• Bakker E.J., 1993, Boundaries, Topics, and the Structure of Discourse. An Investigation of the Ancient Greek Particle Dé, „Studies in Language” 17, nr 2, s. 275–311, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sl.17.2.02bak.
• Benveniste E., 1960/1966, ‘Etre’ et ‘avoir’ dans leurs fonctions linguistiques, „Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris” 55, s. 113–134 [przedr.: idem, Problèmes de linguistique générale, Paris 1966, s. 187–207].
• Boryś W., 2005, Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego, Kraków.
• Clark E.V., 1978, Locationals: Existential, Locative, and Possessive Constructions, [w:] J.H. Greenberg, Ch.A. Ferguson, E.A. Moravcsik (red.), Universals of Human Language, t. 4: Syntax, Stanford, s. 85–126.
• Diessel H., 1997, Predicative Demonstratives, [w:] Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure, s. 72–82, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/bls.v23i1.1282.
• Diessel H., 1999, The Morphosyntax of Demonstratives in Synchrony and Diachrony, „Linguistic Typology” 3, s. 1–49, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.1.
• Dixon R.M.W., 2009, The Semantics of Clause Linking in Typological Perspective, [w:] R.M.W. Dixon, A. Aikhenvald (red.), The Semantics of Clause Linking. A Cross-Linguistic Typology, Oxford, s. 1–55.
• DP: Postilla Catholicka. Tái est: Ižguldimas Ewangeliu kiekwienos Nedelos ir szwętes per wissús metús. Per Kúnigą Mikaloiv Davkszą Kanonîką Médnikų… 1599, [w:] J. Palionis (red.), Mikalojaus Daukšos 1599 metų Postilė ir jos šaltiniai, Vilnius 2000.
• Endzelin J., 1922, Lettische Grammatik, Riga.
• Ford G.B, 1967, esti und yra in Vilentas’ Enchiridion, „Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie” 30, s. 353–357.
• Forker D., 2016, Toward a Typology for Additive Markers, „Lingua” 180, s. 69–100, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.008.
• Fraenkel E., 1962–1965, Litauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, Heidelberg.
• Frajzyngier Z., 1996, Grammaticalization of the Complex Sentence. A Case Study in Chadic, Amsterdam – Philadelphia.
• Griffith A., 2011, The Etymology of OIr. ocus “and” and Methodology, [on-line:] https://www.univie.ac.at/indogermanistik/download/Griffith/Marburg/The%20Etymology%20of%20ocus.pdf.
• Haspelmath M., 2007, Coordination, [w:] T. Shopen (red.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, t. 2: Complex Constructions, Cambridge, s. 1–51.
• Heine B., 1997, Cognitive Foundations of Grammar, Oxford.
• Klingenschmitt G., 2008, Lit. úošvis, „Baltistica” 43, nr 3, s. 405–429, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/baltistica.43.3.1392.
• König E., 1991, The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective, London – New York.
• Lehmann Ch., 1995, Thoughts on Grammaticalization, München – Newcastle.
• LKŽ: Lietuvių kalbos žodynas, Vilnius 1968–2002.
• Lyons J., 1967, A Note on Possessive, Existential, and Locative Sentences, „Foundations of Language” 3, nr 4, s. 390–396.
• Malchukov A.L., 2004, Towards a Semantic Typology of Adversative and Contrast Marking, „Journal of Semantics” 21, nr 2, s. 177–198, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/21.2.177.
• Mithun M., 1988, The Grammaticization of Coordination, [w:] J. Haiman, S.A. Thompson (red.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, s. 181–225.
• Nedoma R., 2011, Altisländisches Lesebuch. Ausgewählte Texte und Minimalwörterbuch des Altisländischen, Heidelberg.
• Ostrowski N., 2014, Once again on the Postponed Neuter Pronoun -ti, „Baltistica” 49, nr 2, s. 265–278, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/baltistica.49.2.2217.
• Ostrowski N., 2015, The Origin of the Lithuanian Particle jùk, [w:] A. Judžentis, S. Kessler (red.), Contributions to Syntax and Morphology. Proceedings of the 4th Greifswald University Conference on Baltic Languages, Berlin, s. 201–215.
• Ostrowski N., 2017, Non-verbal Predication in Baltic. Lithuanian yrà, [w:] M. Németh, B. Podolak, M. Urban (red.), Essays in the History of Languages and Linguistics. Dedicated to Marek Stachowski on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Kraków, s. 463–471.
• Ostrowski N., w druku, „Natural Coordination” and the Origin of the Lithuanian Conjunction beĩ ‘and’. Remarks to Old Prussian-Lithuanian Language Contacts.
• Owiński K., 2016, Rozwój funkcjonalny spójników „a” oraz „i” w języku czeskim do XVII wieku na tle stanu współczesnego, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, praca magisterska.
• Payne J.R., 1985, Complex Phrases and Complex Sentences, [w:] T. Shopen (red.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, t. 2: Complex Constructions, Cambridge, s. 3–41.
• Petit D., 2010, On Presentative Particles in the Baltic Languages, [w:] N. Nau, N. Ostrowski, Particles and Connectives in Baltic, Vilnius, s. 151–170.
• Rejzek J., 2001, Český etymologický slovník, Vozice.
• Schmalstieg W.R., 1995, An Introduction to Old Russian, „Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series”, nr 15, Washington.
• Stang Ch.S., 1947/1970, Esti et yra dans les Punktay Sakimu de Szyrwid, „Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap” 14, s. 87–97 [przedr.: idem, Opuscula linguistica. Ausgewählte Aufsätze und Abhandlungen, Oslo 1970, s. 172–180].
• Stang Ch.S., 1963/1970 = [Станг Х.С.], Третье лицо глагола „быть” в литовском и латышском языках, [w:] Ю. Маслов (ред.), Вопросы теории и истории языка. Сбор-ник в честь Б.А. Ларина, Ленинград, s. 285–289 [przedr.: idem, Opuscula linguistica.Ausgewählte Aufsätze und Abhandlungen, Oslo 1970, s. 206–211].
• Stassen L., 2000, AND-Languages and WITH-Languages, „Linguistic Typology” 4, nr 1, s. 1–54, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.1.
• Stassen L., 2001, Noun Phrase Coordination, [w:] M. Haspelmath i in. (red.), Language Typology and Language Universals, t. 2, Berlin – New York, s. 1105–1111.
• Traugott E.C., 1985, Conditional Markers, [w:] J. Haiman (red.), Iconicity in Syntax, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, s. 289–307.
• Vasmer–Trubačev 1986 [= Фасмер], Зтимологический словарь русского языка, перевод с немецкого и дополнения члена-корреспондента АН СССР О.Н. Трубачева, т. I–II, Москва.
• Wackernagel J., 1924, Vorlesungen über Syntax mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch, Basel.
• Watkins C., 1967/1994, Remarks on the Genitive, [w:] To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, t. 3: 2191–2198, The Hague – Paris [przedr.: idem, Selected Writings, Language and Linguistics, red. L. Oliver, t. 1, Innsbruck 1994].
• Yong W., Jie X., 2013, A Systemic Typology of Existential and Possessive Constructions, „Functions of Language” 20, nr 1, s. 1–30, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/fol.20.1.01wan.
• Zinkevičius Z., 1980, Lietuvių kalbos istorinė gramatika, Vilnius.
• Zwart J.-W., 2005, Some Notes on Coordination in Head-Final Languages, „Linguistics in the Netherlands” 22, nr 1, s. 231–242, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/avt.22.21zwa.
• Борковский В.И, Кузнецов П.С., 2006, Историческая грамматика русского языка, Москва.

Identifiers

DOI

10.12797/LV.12.2017.24.10