Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2019 | 1 (48) | 135-154

Article title

The Convergence of Presidential and Parliamentary Elections in France: Analysis of Systemic Tendencies from the Perspective of Sixty Years of the Fifth Republic

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The paper deals with specific links between presidential and parliamentary elections in contemporary France. The main goal is to demonstrate that the timing of the two types of political events is a significant factor preserving the configuration of a pro-presidential majority fact as one of the possible variants of French semi-presidentialism. This raises the question of the role of both elections as instruments for controlling the process of setting up a space of political rivalry that could be perceived as optimal from the viewpoint of ruling camps. The author analyses possibilities to provide the convergence of presidential and parliamentary elections under the conditions of a seven-year presidential term as well as after its shortening to five years in 2000. Hence, of particular importance is the impact of some mechanisms used in this field on the institutional logic of the French political system. Specific application of constitutional tools and some normative changes introduced in previous years cause the extent of the aforementioned control to be now much greater than in the first decades of the Fifth Republic. Looking at the convergence of both types of elections from the perspective of the evolution of the existing political system, the author argues that it is legitimate to divide the whole period of the Fifth Republic into three sub-periods: 1. the absence of electoral convergence (1958–1981); 2. partial electoral convergence (1981– –2002); full electoral convergence (since 2002). Due to the acceptance of the pro-presidential paradigm, the latter formula is now definitely preferred and supported by legal regulations, which affects the flexibility of French semi-presidentialism (significantly reduced, but not fully eliminated, probability of cohabitation).

Year

Volume

Pages

135-154

Physical description

Contributors

  • Jagiellonian University

References

  • Agrikoliansky É. (2008). Les partis politiques en France. Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Avril P. (1997). Les conventions de la Constitution. Normes non écrites du droit politique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Bellon Ch. (2003). “La « drôle de dissolution » (21 avril 1997)”. In J. Garrigues (Ed.), La France de la Ve République 1958–2008 (pp. 54–56). Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Bigaut Ch. (2000). Le réformisme constitutionnel en France (1789–2000). Paris: La Documentation Française.
  • Bréchon P. (2003). La France aux urnes. Soixante ans d’histoire électorale. Paris: La Documentation Française.
  • Bréchon P., Denni B. (2013). L’élection dans son contexte: candidats et forces en présence. In P. Béchon, Les élections présidentielles sous la Ve République (pp. 21–78). Paris: La Documentation Française.
  • Carcassonne G., Guillaume M. (2016). La Constitution. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
  • Carrier M. (2016). Executive Politics in Semi-Presidential Regimes. Power Distribution and Conflicts between Presidents and Prime Ministers. Lanham – Boulder – New York – London: Lexington Books.
  • Castagnez N. (2008). “L’alterance (1981)”. In J. Garrigues (Ed.), La France de la Ve République 1958–2008 (pp. 31–34). Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Chantebout B. (1992). La constitution française. Propos pour un débat. Paris: Dalloz.
  • Chantebout B. (2004). Brève histoire politique et institutionnelle de la Ve République. Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Chevallier J.-J., Carcassonne G., Duhamel O. (2007). Histoire de la Ve République (1958–2007). Paris: Dalloz.
  • Cohendet M.-A. (1999). “Cohabitation et Constitution”. Pouvoirs, 91 (4), pp. 33–57.
  • Cohendet M.-A. (2002). Le Président de la République. Paris: Dalloz.
  • Cole A. (2003). “Stress, strain and stability in the French party system”. In J. Evans (Ed.), The French party system (pp. 11–26). Manchester-New York: Manchester University Press.
  • Colliard J.-C. (1978). Les régimes parlementaires contemporains. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.
  • Constitution du 4 octobre 1958. Le Service Public de la Diffusion de Droit. Retrieved from: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006071194.
  • Debbasch Ch., Bourdon J., Pontier J.M., Ricci J.C. (1988). La Ve République. Paris: Économica.
  • Debré J.-L. (1974). Les idées constitutionnelles du général de Gaulle. Paris: Libraire Général de Droit et de Jurisprudence.
  • Devedeix-Margueritat S. (2001). Le quinquennat. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  • Duhamel O. (2000). Le quinquennat. Paris: Presses de Science Po.
  • Duhamel O., Tusseau G. (2013). Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
  • Duverger M. (1974). La monarchie républicaine ou comment les démocraties se donnent des rois. Paris: Éditions Robert Laffont.
  • Elgie R. (1993). The role of the Prime Minister in France, 1981–1991. Martin’s Press: New York.
  • Elgie R. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism. Sub-Types and Democratic Performance. Oxford-New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Evans J., Ivaldi G. (2018). The 2017 French Presidential Elections. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Garrigues J. (2008). “Le non à de Gaulle (27 avril 1969)”. In J. Garrigues (Ed.), La France de la Ve République 1958–2008 (pp. 23–25). Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Gicquel J., Gicquel J.-É (2015). Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques, Issy-les-Moulineaux: L.G.D.J.
  • Gicquel J.-É. (2009). “Article 6”. In F. Luchaire, G. Conac, X. Prétot (Eds.), La Constitution de la République française. Analyses et commentaires (pp. 298–327). Paris: Économica.
  • Gohin O. (2013). Droit constitutionnel. Paris: LexisNexis SA.
  • Hamon F., Troper M. (2005). Droit constitutionnel. Paris: L.G.D.J.
  • Hanley D. (2003). “Managing the plural left: implications for the party system”. In J. Evans (Ed.), The French party system (pp. 76–90). Manchester-New York: Manchester University Press.
  • Jakubiak Ł. (2012). Referendum jako narzędzie polityki. Francuskie doświadczenia ustrojowe. Cracov: Księgarnia Akademicka.
  • Jakubiak Ł. (2013). “Przesłanki rozwiązania parlamentu w praktyce ustrojowej V Republiki Francuskiej”. Przegląd Politologiczny. Political Science Review, 2, pp. 57–70.
  • Jakubiak Ł. (2016). “Francja”. In J. Szymanek (Ed.), Niedemokratyczne wymiary demokratycznych wyborów (pp. 406–434). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.
  • Lauvaux Ph. (2002). Destins du présidnetialisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Lavroff D.G. (1999). Le droit constitutionnel de la Ve République. Paris: Dalloz.
  • Lazardeux S.G. (2010). “The French National Assembly’s Oversight of the Executive: Changing Role, Partisanship and Intra-Majority Conflict”. In E. Grossman, N. Sauger (Eds.), France’s Political Institu­tions at 50 (pp. 45–67). London-New York: Routledge.
  • Les élections en France. Les résultats. Ministère de l’Intérieur. Le Service Public de la Diffusion de Droit. Retrieved from: https://www.interieur.gouv.fr/Elections/Les-resultats.
  • Levade A. (2010). “Les nouveaux équilibres de la Ve République”. Revue française de droit constitutionnel, 82 (2), pp. 227–256.
  • Loi constitutionnelle no 2000–964 du 2 octobre 2000 relative à la durée du mandat du Président de la République. Le Service Public de la Diffusion de Droit. Retrieved from: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jo_pdf.do?id=JORFTEXT000000219201.
  • Loi organique no 2001–419 du 15 mai 2001 modifiant la date d’expiration des pouvoirs de l’Assemblée na­tionale. Le Service Public de la Diffusion de Droit. Retrieved from: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jo_pdf.do?id=JORFTEXT000000404920.
  • Mastias J. (1999). A Problem of Identity: The French Sénat. In S.C. Patterson, A. Mughan (Eds.), Bicameralism in the Contemporary World (pp. 162–198). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  • Pactet P., Mélin-Soucramanien F. (2007). Droit constitutionnel. Paris: Dalloz.
  • Philip L. (2008). “Pour une rationalisation des pouvoirs dans le cadre des institutions de la Ve République”. In Constitutions et pouvoirs. Mélanges en l’honneur de Jean Gicquel (pp. 419–429). Paris: Montchrestien- Lextenso éditions.
  • Quermonne J.-L. (2003). L’alternance au pouvoir. Paris: Montchrestien.
  • Sartori G. (1997). Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. New York: New York University Press.
  • Thevenon G. (2016). La Cinquième République. Vie politique française. Lyon: Chronique Sociale.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-a50a11d5-6056-4980-8f96-33f64128c4f4
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.