Transkrypcja jako działanie interpretacyjne

• Authors: Joanna Bielecka-Prus

Title variants

EN

Transcription as interpretative activity

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Główne tezy: 1. Transkrypcja danych (audio i wizualnych) jest częścią praktyki badawczej słabo poddanej refleksji. 2. Transkrypcja jest aktem interpretacji, a nie odwzorowania danych. Na ten akt mogą wpływać zróżnicowane czynniki społeczne i kulturowe. 3. Są zróżnicowane sposoby transkrypcji danych: wybór sposobu transkrypcji wpływa w istotny sposób na osiągnięte rezultaty badawcze. 4. Kryteria oceny jakości transkrypcji nie są jednoznaczne. Dyskusja: w jaki sposób sprawdzamy jakość transkrypcji w prowadzonych przez nas badaniach?

EN

The main theses: 1. Transcription of data (audio and visual) is a part of research practice subject to weak afterthought. 2. Transcription is an interpretative act, not the projection of data. This act may be influenced by varied social and cultural factors. 3. There are diversified methods of data transcription; the choice of a method of transcription significantly influences the achieved research results. 4. The assessment criteria of the quality of transcription are not unambiguous. The discussion: How do we check the quality of transcription in the research being carried out?

Keywords

PL

badania jakościowe; transkrypcja; analiza danych

EN

qualitative research; transcription; dataanalysis

• Publisher: Lubuskie Towarzystwo Naukowe
• Journal: Rocznik Lubuski
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 41
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 41-54

Contributors

author

Joanna Bielecka-Prus

• Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

References

• Angrosino M. (2010), Badania etnograficzne i obserwacyjne, PWN, Warszawa.
• Atkinson P. (1992), Understanding ethnographic texts, Sage, London.
• Barbour R. (2011), Badania fokusowe, PWN, Warszawa.
• Bezemer J., Mavers D. (2011), Multimodal transcription as academic practice: a social semiotic perspective, „International Journal of Social Research Methodology”, 14, 3, 191-207.
• Bird C.M. (2005), How I stopped dreading and learned to love transcription, „Qualitative Inquiry”, 11, 226-248.
• Bloor M., Wood F. (2006), Keywords in qualitative methods, Sage, London.
• Bucholtz M. (2000), The politics of transcription, „Journal of Pragmatics”, 32, 1439-1465.
• Chiari I. (2007), Transcribing speech: errors in corpora and experimental setting, Proceedings on Corpus Linguistics, Birmingham.
• Cook G. (1990), Transcribing infinity: problem of context presentation, „Journal of Pragmatics”, 14, 1-24.
• Cooper D. (1984), Labov, Larry and Charles, „Oxford Review of Education”, 10, 2, 177-192.
• Corbin J., Strauss A. (2008), Basics of qualitative research, Sage, London.
• Davidson C. (2009), Transcription: imperatives for qualitative research, „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, 8 (2), 35-52.
• Davidson P.M. (2006), Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary?, „Applied Nursing Research”, 19, 38-42.
• Drew P., Heritage J. (1992), Analyzing talk at work: an introduction, [w:] Talk at work, red. P. Drew, J. Heritage, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 3-65.
• Edwards J.A., Lampert M.D. (1993), Talking Data: Transcription and coding in discourse research, Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ.
• Evers J.C. (2011), From the past into the future. How technological developments change our ways of data collection, transcription and analysis, „Forum: Qualitative Social Research” 12 (1), http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101381.
• Flick U. (2006), An Introduction to qualitative research, Sage, London.
• Geertz C. (2005), Interpretacja kultur, Wydawnictwo UJ, Kraków.
• Glaser B.G, Strauss A.L. (2007), Odkrywanie teorii ugruntowanej, Nomos, Kraków.
• Glesne C. (1997), That rare feeling: re-presenting research through poetic transcription, „Qualitative Inquiry”, 3 (2), 202-221.
• Grundy A., Dawn L., Pollon E., Mcginn M.K. (2003), The participant as transcriptionist: methodological advantages of a collaborative and inclusive research practice, „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, 2 (2), 23-32.
• Hammersley M., Atkinson P. (2000), Metody badań terenowych, Zysk i S-ka, Warszawa.
• Jaffe A. (2007), Variability in transcription and the complexities of representation authority and voice, „Discourse Studies”, 9, 831-836.
• Jefferson G. (1985), An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter, [w:] Handbook of discourse analysis, t. 3, red. T.A. van Dijk, Academic Press, London, 25-34.
• Lapadat J.C. (2000), Problematizing transcription: purpose, paradigm and quality, „Social Research Methodology”, 3 (3), 203-219.
• Lofland J., Snow D.A., Anderson L., Lofland L.H. (2009), Analiza układów społecznych, Scholar, Warszawa.
• Kaufmann J.C. (2010), Wywiad rozumiejący, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa.
• Konecki T.K. (2000), Studia z metodologii badań jakościowych:teoria ugruntowana, PWN, Warszawa.
• Konecki T.K., Chomczyński P. (red.) (2012), Słownik socjologii jakościowej, Difin, Warszawa.
• Mergenthaler E., Stinson C.H. (1992), Psychotherapy transcription standards, „Psychotherapy Research”, 2 (2), 125-142.
• Mero-Jaffe I. (2011), ‘Is that what I said?’ Interview transcript approval by participants: an aspect of ethics in qualitative research, „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, 10 (3), 231-247.
• Mishler E.G. (1991), Representing discourse: the rhetoric of transcription, „Journal of Narrative and Life History”, 1 (4), 225-280.
• Mondada L. (2007), Commentary: transcript variations and the indexicality of transcribing practices, „Discourse Studies”, 9, 809-821.
• Morgan D.L. (1997), Focus groups as qualitative research, Sage, London.
• Norton L.S. (2009), Action research in teaching and learning, Routledge, London.
• Ochs E. (1999), Transcription as theory, [w:] The discourse reader, red. A. Jaworski, N. Coupland, Routledge, London, 167-182.
• O’dell T., Willim R. (2013), Transcription and the senses: cultural analysis when it entails more than words, „Senses and Society”, 8 (3), 314-334.
• Potter J., Edwarda D. (1999), Social representations and discursive psychology: from cognition to action, „Culture & Psychology”, 5 (4), 447-458.
• Rancew-Sikora D. (2007), Analiza konwersacyjna jako metoda badania rozmów codziennych, Trio, Warszawa.
• Rapley T. (2010), Analiza konwersacji, dyskursu i dokumentów, PWN, Warszawa.
• Ritchie J., Lewis J. (red.) (2003), Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers, Sage, London.
• Roth W.M. (2005), Doing qualitative research praxis of method, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.
• Silverman D. (2007), Interpretacja danych jakościowych, PWN, Warszawa.
• Slembrouck S. (2007), Transcription the extended directions of data histories: a response to M. Bucholtz’s ‘Variation in Transcription’, „Discourse Studies”, 9, 822-827.
• Strauss A.L. (1987), Qualitative analysis for social scientists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Stringer E.T. (2007), Action Research, Sage, London.
• Ten Have P. (1999), Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide, Sage, London.
• Ten Have P. (2004), Understanding qualitative research and ethnomethodology, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Tilley S.A. (2003), Challenging research practices: turning a critical lens on the work of transcription, „Qualitative Inquiry”, 9 (5), 750-773.
• Will G., Webb H., Lehn D. (2014), Analytic Affordance: Transcripts as conventionalised systems in discourse studies, „Sociology”, 48, 780-794.
• Wolcott H.F. (2009), Writing up qualitative research, Sage, London.
• Yin R.K. (2011), Qualitative research from start to finish, The Guilford Press, New York.