Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2013 | 21 | 3(122) | 114-138

Article title

From Knowledge to Firm Performance: An Empirical analysis of Intellectual Capital Impact in Polish and Dutch Listed Firms

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Purpose: Empirical results about the direct relation of knowledge leading to financial performance at a firm is dispersed. This study aims to examine the impact intellectual capital (IC) has on firm performance in Polish and Dutch listed firms. Methodology: Quantitative data is collected based on audited annual reports from the top 20 companies listed at the Warsaw Stock Exchange and Amsterdam Stock Exchange between 2007 and 2011. IC is measured using the VAIC methodology with its individual elements of HCE, SCE, and CEE. Direct relations between ICE, HCE, and SCE and five measures of firm performance are statistically analysed. Results: The results suggest that there is a direct positive relationship between ICE and firm performance of Polish and Dutch listed firms, particularly with ROA, ROE, EP, and to a lesser extent with ATO. Firms listed in Poland provide a stronger positive ICE relation to ROA and ROE where firms listed in the Netherlands provide a stronger positive ICE relation to EP. Regarding individual elements, HCE relates highly positive to ROA, ROE, and EP where SCE finds only partial negative relation with ATO. Implications: Nurturing IC and in particular HC confirms the importance of firm knowledge and employees with right training and other support. Additionally, further clarification regarding SC is required. Originality: This paper presents the first study of the IC relationship with firm performance in Poland as well in the Netherlands. Additionally, the comparison between firms of both countries establishes a novelty in IC research.

Year

Volume

21

Issue

Pages

114-138

Physical description

Dates

published
2013-09-15

Contributors

author
  • Kozminski University

References

  • Al-Twaijry, A. (2009). Intangible assets and future growth: evidence from Japan. Asian Review of Accounting, 17(1): 23–39.
  • Andriessen, D. (2004). Making Sense of Intellectual Capital: Designing a Method for the Valuation of Intangibles. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Bollen, L., Vergauwen, P. and Schnieders, S. (2005). Linking intellectual capital and intellectual property to company performance. Management Decision, 43(9): 1161–1185.
  • Bontis, N. (1999). Managing organisational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5): 433–462.
  • Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1): 41–60.
  • Bontis, N. (2004). National intellectual capital index: a United Nations initiative for the Arab region. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1): 13–39.
  • Chan, K.H. (2009a). Impact of intellectual capital on organisational performance, an empirical study of companies in the Hang Seng Index (part 1). The Learning Organization, 16(1): 4–12.
  • Chan, K.H. (2009b). Impact of intellectual capital on organisational performance. An empericical study of companies in the Hang Seng Index (Part 2). The Learning Organization, 16(1): 22–39.
  • Chen, M.-C., Cheng, S.-J. and Hwang, Y. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms' market value and financial performance. Jounal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2): 159–176.
  • Choong, K.K. (2008). Intellectual capital: definitions, categorization and reporting models. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4): 609–638.
  • Chu, S.K.W., Chan, K.H. and Wu, W.W.Y. (2011). Charting intellectual capital performance of the gateway to China. Jounal of Intellectual Capital, 12(2): 249–276.
  • Clarke, M., Seng, D., & Whiting, R.H. (2011). Intellectual capital and firm performance in Australia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(4): 505–530.
  • Drucker, P.F. (1994). Post-capitalist society: Harper Paperbacks.
  • Edvinsson, L. and Malone, M.S. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York, NY: Harper Business.
  • Firer, S., and Williams, S.M. (2003). Intellectual captial and traditional measures of corporate performance. Jounal of Intellectual Capital, 4(3): 346–360.
  • Kamath, G.B. (2008). Intellectual capital and corporate performance in Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4): 684–704.
  • Komnenic, B. and Pokrajcic, D. (2012). Intellectual capital and corporate performance of MNCs in Serbia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(1): 106–119.
  • Kornecki, L. (2010). FDI in central and eastern Europe: business environment and current FDI trends in Poland. Research in Business & Economics Journal, 3: 1–12.
  • Kujansivu, P., and Lonnqvist, A. (2007). Investigating the value and efficiency of intellectual capital. Jounal of Intellectual Capital, 8(2): 272–287.
  • Kujansivu, P. and Lönnqvist, A. (2005). How do investments in intellectual capital create profits? Frontiers of E-business Research: 304–318.
  • Maditinos, D., Chatzoudes, D., Tsairidis, C. and Theriou, G. (2011). The impact of intellectual capital on firms' market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(1): 132–151.
  • Mehralian, G., Rajabzadeh, A., Sadeh, M.R. and Rasekh, H.R. (2012). Intellectual capital and corporate performance in Iranian pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(1): 138–158.
  • Meyers, L., Gamst, G., and Guarino, A.J. (2006). Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Mouritsen, J., Larsen, H.T. and Bukh, P. (2001). Intellectual capital and the ‘capable firm’: narrating, visualising and numbering for managing knowledge. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7): 735–762.
  • Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review: 242–266.
  • Nazari, J.A. and Herremans, I.M. (2007). Extending VAIC model: measuring intellectual capital components. Jounal of Intellectual Capital, 8(4): 595–609.
  • Pulic, A. (2000). VAIC: an accounting tool for IC management. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(5–8): 702–714.
  • Shiu, H.-J. (2006). The application of the value added intellectual coefficient to measure coporate performance: evidence from technological firms. International Journal of Management, 23(2), 356–365.
  • Stewart, T.A. (1997). Intellectual Capital. New York, NY: Bantam Doubleday Dell.
  • Sullivan, P.H. (2000). Value-driven intellectual capital: How to convert intangible corporate assets into market value. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Sveiby, K.E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: managing & measuring knowledge-based assets: Berrett-Koehler Pub.
  • Tan, H.P., Plowman, D. and Hancock, P. (2007). Intellectual capital and financial returns of companies. Jounal of Intellectual Capital, 8(1), 76–95.
  • Ting, I.W.K. and Lean, H.H. (2009). Intellectual capital performance of financial institutions in Malaysia. Jounal of Intellectual Capital, 10(4), 588–599.
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
  • Zambon, S. (2004). Intangibles and intellectual capital: an overview of the reporting issues and some measurement models. In: P. Bianchi & S. Labory (Eds.), The Economic Importance of Intangible Assets (pp. 153–183). Ashgate: Aldershot.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-afea135c-d480-427e-be77-7816f154a45c
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.