Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 21 | 39-53

Article title

Metaphoric Expressions in Business Communication

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Figurative language has always been used in business communication, with metaphoric expressions being its most representative and frequent elements. Metaphor is defined as a transference of the literal meaning of a word into another context, which means that one thing is described in terms of some other thing (M. Long/ J. Richards 1999), e.g. time is money, cash cow, sleeping beauty. It is the notion of either comparison or resemblance that creates the basis for metaphor – instead of the literal meaning of a word or expression native language users can easily produce a metaphoric expression and understand its figurative meaning. Metaphors are culture-specific and they reveal patterns of thought that are characteristic of individuals and of groups (G. Lakoff/ M. Johnson 1980). Business English metaphors can, and indeed do, reflect the values, beliefs and norms that prevail in the language of business communication in English-speaking countries and in many global companies in which English is a lingua franca. Figurative expressions are frequently found to be the preferred way of conveying meaning and business communicators tend to use metaphoric expressions both in written and spoken discourse. In this study popular standard business metaphors were excerpted by hand from three dictionaries: Cambridge Business English Dictionary and Thesaurus, Longman Business English Dictionary (2007), and Oxford Collocations Dictionary (2008). It was arbitrarily assumed that the inclusion of a metaphor into one or more of these dictionaries suggests that it is considered to be a standard (‘dead’) business metaphor. The excerpted metaphors were classified (1) formally, i.e. according to the structure of a given metaphor and (2) semantically, i.e. according to the concept which underlies a given metaphor. The paper also gives examples of ‘living’ (novel) business metaphors excerpted from a small, and therefore not representative, research corpus of articles published in “The Wall Street Journal” on 25 February 2015. The aim of the presented examples of metaphors is to demonstrate how easily novel metaphors can be created. Then, the paper discusses the functions and characteristics of popular metaphors used in typical business situations. Finally, it identifies some of the challenges in metaphor understanding and metaphor usage faced by non-native speakers of business English.

Year

Issue

21

Pages

39-53

Physical description

Dates

published
2017

Contributors

  • Koźmiński University

References

  • Boers, F. (2000), Metaphor Awareness and Vocabulary Retention. In: ELT Journal, 21, 553–571.
  • Cambridge Business Dictionary and Thesaurus. (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/business-english; accessed 10.05.2016].
  • Cortazzi, M./ L. Jin (1999), Bridges to learning: Metaphors of teaching, learning and language. In: L. Cameron/ G. Low (eds), Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge, 149–174.
  • Cameron, L./ G. Low (1999), Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge.
  • Henderson, W. (2000), Metaphor, economics and ESP: Some comments. In: English for Specific Purposes, 19, 167–173.
  • Lakoff, G./ M. Johnson (1980), Metaphors We Live By. Chicago.
  • Lewis, M. (1997), Pedagogical implications of the lexical approach. In: J. Coady/ T. Huckin (eds), Second language vocabulary acquisition. Cambridge, 273–290.
  • Littlemore, J./ G. Low (2006), Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. Hampshire.
  • Long, M./ J. Richards (1999), Series editors’ preface. In: L. Cameron/ G. Low (eds), Researching and Applying Metaphors. Cambridge, x–xi.
  • Longman Business English Dictionary (2007). Harlow.
  • Oxford Collocations Dictionary (2008). New York.
  • Richards, J./ R. Schmidt (2002), Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics. Harlow.
  • Thornbury, S. (1991), Metaphors we work by: EFL and its metaphors. In: ELT Journal, 45 (3), 193–200.
  • Trim, R. (2007), Metaphor Networks. The Comparative Evolution of Figurative Language. New York.
  • Widdowson, H.G. (1996), Linguistics. Oxford.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
2080-4814

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-bf46869a-86d3-4000-98ff-a86eb15c956a
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.