Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2014 | 6(32) | 13-22

Article title

Metodologia politologii według Giovanniego Sartoriego

Authors

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

EN
Giovanni Sartori’s Methodology of Political Science

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
Giovanni Sartori, one of the greatest world’s political scientist, was also very interesting in methodology of political science. In his opinion methodology is more the method of logos, of thinking than specific research techniques. He wrote: There is no methodology without logos, without thinking about thinking. Sartori strongly expressed regret that the today’s mainstream of political science is mainly quantitative and statistical, not qualitative. According to his standpoint political scientists should be strongly interested in the question “What is?”, before asking “How much?”. Sartori is admirer of the qualitative approach to methodology. This approach is based on logically defined concepts and the careful and precise use of language, because bad language generates bad thinking.

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Jagielloński

References

  • Huntington S.P., Order and Conflict in Global Perspective, [w:] G.L. Munck, R. Snyder, Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics, Baltimore 2007.
  • Kubát M., Giovanni Sartori and Concept Formation. Why Contemporary Comparative Politics is not Sartorian?, referat wygłoszony na konferencji „Giovanni Sartori: 90 Years of a Political Scientist”, Praga, 26 IX 2014.
  • Linz J.J., Between Nations and Disciplines. Personal Experience and Intellectual Understanding of Societas and Political Regimes, [w:] Comparative European Politics. The Story of a Profession, ed. H. Daalder, London 1997.
  • Masters of Political Science, red. D. Campus, G. Pasquino, Colchester 2009.
  • Munck G.L., Snyder R., Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics, Baltimore 2007.
  • O’Donnell G., Democratization, Political Engagement, and Agenda‑Setting Research, [w:] G.L. Munck, R. Snyder, Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics, Baltimore 2007. Social Science Concepts. A Systematic Analysis, red. G. Sartori, Beverly Hills 1984.

Document Type

Publication order reference

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-bfb6b7c8-41e6-430f-93a3-c4334b9b8b20
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.