SLOW W EDUKACJI CZYLI POWRÓT DO PODMIOTOWOŚCI

• Authors: ISKRA JUSTYNA , KLINKOSZ WALDEMAR , ARTYMIAK MAŁGORZATA

Title variants

EN

SLOW IN EDUCATION A RETURN TO SUBJECTIVITY

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The article aims to present the importance of education focused on the human subjectivity. The idea of subjectivity is inextricably connected to the concept of human seen as a person, as found in the field of humanist psychology. Human as a subject is an active and decision-making initiator of actions, someone who occupies the surrounding reality, someone who takes on social roles, and someone who undertakes tasks. Slow in education focuses not on the pace of learning, but on the enjoyment of learning and the spontaneity found at the root of the participation in the learning process. Slow helps to practice contemplation, internal balance, dialogue, empathy, and intellectual openness.

Keywords

EN

slow, subjectivity, person, education

• Publisher: Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Chełmie
• Journal: Scientific Bulletin of Chełm - Section of Pedagogy
• Year: 2017
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 11-21

Contributors

author

ISKRA JUSTYNA

• Old Polish University

author

KLINKOSZ WALDEMAR

• The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

author

ARTYMIAK MAŁGORZATA

• University of Economics and Innovation in Lublin

References

• Artymiak, M. (2013). Fundamental aspects of the theory of self-determination in R.M. Ryan and E.L. Deci. In: Z. Uchnast (ed.), Character. The quality of personal action in a theoretical and empirical approach (95-107), Lublin: TN KUL.
• Berg, M., Seeber, B. K. (2016). The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Beverage, M.W. (2003). Slow change in a fast culture. Educause Review, 5, 10-11.
• Dąbrowski, S. (2016). Slow professors in academic culture of speed. Teraźniejszość – Człowiek – Edukacja, 4, 139-150.
• Gruniuk-Toruń, I. (2002). Assisting the student in personal development as an educational goal. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie - Skłodowska, 1.
• Holt, M. (2002). It's Time to Start the Slow School Movement. Phi Delta Kappan, 4 (84), 264-271.
• Honoré, C. (2011a). Praise the slowness. How to slow down and enjoy life. Warszawa: Wydawca Drzewo Babel.
• Honoré, C. (2011b). Under the pressure. Let's give the kids peace of mind! Warszawa: Wydawca Drzewo Babel.
• Jarmużek, J. (2014). Subjectivity in education and the level of coherence. In: K. Przyszczypkowski, T. Polak, I. Cytlak (ed.), Political entanglement of educational systems. An exploratory social problem (233-248), Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
• Lendzion, A. (2012). Youth and character values. Lublin: KUL.
• Mańka, M. (1980). Polemics around humanistic psychology. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 3 (57), 429 - 444.
• May, R. (1989). Psychology and human dilemma. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy PAX.
• Myszka, L. (2015). Reflections on education in the era of globalization. Kultura – Społeczeństwo – Edukacja, 1 (7), 75-89.
• Perkowska-Klejman, A. (2013). Models of reflective learning. Teraźniejszość – Człowiek – Edukacja, 1 (61), 75 - 90.
• Reis, H. T. et al.(2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419-435.
• Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54 - 67, doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
• Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory. In: E.L. Deci, R.M. Ryan (ed.), Handbook of self - determination research (3 - 33), Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
• Saran, J. (2011). The new educational situation of a student in a modern university. In: J. Saran, M. Żmigrodzki (ed.), Student as a subject of education in a contemporary university, Lublin: Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomii i Innowacji w Lublinie.
• Siegel, R.D. (2014). Mindfulness. Training to overcome daily difficulties. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Czarna Owca.
• Tokarz, A. (2004). Stimulating motivation that fosters creative activity at school. In: W. Limont (ed.), Theory and practice of educating talented pupils (63-94), Kraków: Impuls.
• Tokarz, A. (2005). Motivation as a condition of creative activity. In: A. Tokarz (ed.), In search of applied psychology of creativity (51-72), Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• Uchnast, Z. (1978). Attempt to measure metric and subjective dimensions of personality. Częstochowskie Studia Teologiczne, 6, 461 - 478.
• Uchnast, Z. (1987). The concept of man as a person in humanistic-existential psychology. In: K. Popielski (ed.), Man-question open (77 - 100), Lublin: RW KUL.
• Uszyńska-Jarmoc, J. (2007). From potential creativity to autocreation at school. Białystok: Trans Humana.