Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 53 | 3(213) | 309-322

Article title

Scientific foundation aspects of business models theory

Content

Title variants

PL
Podstawy naukowe teorii modeli biznesowych – wybrane aspekty

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
During the last two decades, the literature in management studies has shown a signifi cant increase in interest in the theory of business models, and there has been wide-ranging discussion about the definitions of those models. These studies and discussions have provoked questions about the scientifi c nature of business models. The question is analysed here by using the methodology of the Scientific Research Tradition (ScRT) proposed by Larry Laudan. The result confirmed that the theory of business models that is created and defined based on management sciences falls under the scope of ScRT.
PL
W ostatnich dwóch dekadach odnotowano w literaturze dotyczącej zarządzania znaczący wzrost zainteresowania teorią modeli biznesowych, jak również szeroko zakrojonej dyskusji na temat definicji modelu biznesowego. Te badania i dyskusje budziły wątpliwości dotyczące naukowego charakteru modeli biznesowych. Kwestia naukowych podstaw modeli biznesowych została w tym artykule poddana analizie i ocenie, z wykorzystaniem Metodologii Tradycji Badań Naukowych (MTBN) zaproponowanej przez Larrego Laudana. Uzyskany tą drogą rezultat potwierdził, że teoria modeli biznesowych, która jest tworzona w oparciu o fundamenty naukowe zarządzania mieści się w zakresie MTBN.

Year

Volume

53

Issue

Pages

309-322

Physical description

Dates

published
2017-09

Contributors

  • Department of Economics and Innovation, Jagiellonian University
  • Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Cracow

References

  • AEC, 2017, What is economics? available at: https://www.aeaweb.org/resources/students/what-iseconomics [access 23/05/2017].
  • Agazzi, E., 1979, Analogicità del concetto di scienza. Il problema del rigore e dell’oggettività nelle scienze umane, in: Possenti, M., Ed., 1979, Epistemologia e scienze umane, Milano: Massimo, 57–76.
  • Agazzi, E., 1988, L’analogicità del concetto di scienza, “Nuova Secondaria”, 2: 1–10.
  • Applegate, L., Austin, R., Sole, D., 2009, Corporate information strategy and management: Text and cases, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Blaug, M., 1992, The Methodology of economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Christensen, C.M., Bartman, T., van Bever, D., 2016, The Hard Truth About Business Model Innovation, “MIT Sloan Management Review; Cambridge”, 58.1: 31–40.
  • Coady, D., 2016, Applied Epistemology, in: Lippert-Rasmussen, K., Brownlee, K., Coady, D. Eds., A Companion to Applied Philosopshy, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 51–60.
  • Dupré, J., 1993, Could There Be a Science of Economics?, “Midwest Studies in Philosophy”, 18: 363–378.
  • Elikan, D., Pigneur, Y., 2017, Brand modelling and ontology, 11-th International Workshop on Value Modeling and Business Ontologies, The Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), March 6th – 7th 2017, available at: https://www.list.lu/fileadmin/files/Event/sites/tudor/files/Training_Center/OTHERS/VMBO2017_paper_4.pdf (access 19/05/17).
  • Feyerabend, P.K., 2010, Against Method, New York: Verso Books.
  • Foss, N.J., Saebi, T., 2016, Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation. How Far Have We Come, and Where Should We Go?, “Journal of Management”, 43.1: 200–227.
  • Gordijn, J. & Akkermans, H., 2001, Design and Evaluation of e-Business Models, “IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on e-Business”, 16.4: 11–17.
  • Gordijn, J. & Akkermans, H., 2003, Value-based requirements engineering: Exploring innovative e-commerce ideas, “Requirements Engineering”, 8.2: 114–134.
  • Gorazda, M., 2014, Philosophy of economics, Krakow: Copernicus Center Press.
  • Heller, M., 2009, Nieliniowy model ewolucji nauki, in: Heller, M., Ed., Filozofia nauki, Krakow: Petrus Publisher, 84–92.
  • Kerlinger, F., 1999, Foundations of behavioral research, New York: Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Kruijff, de J., and Weigand, H., 2017, Towards a Blockchain Ontology. 11-th International Workshop on Value Modeling and Business Ontologies, The Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), March 6th – 7th 2017, available at: https://www.list.lu/fi leadmin/files/Event/sites/tudor/files/Training_Center/OTHERS/VMBO2017_paper_5.pdf (access 19/05/17).
  • Kuhn, T., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolution, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lambert, S., 2006, A Business Model Research Schema, 19-th Bled eConference on eValues, Slovenia: Bled, available at: https://www.thelibrarybook.net/view.php?res=https://domino.fov.unimb.si/proceedings.nsf/Proceedings/C6CC94943A84A8A4C125718000319598/$File/20_Lambert.pdf&keyword=A+Business+Model+Research+Schema+University+of+Maribor(access 30/10/2016).
  • Laudan, L., 1977, Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, San Francisco: University of California Press.
  • Laudan, L., 1983, The Demise of the Demarcation Problem, in: Cohen, R. and Laudan, L., Eds., Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, Dordrecht: Reidel, 111–127.
  • Lüdeke-Freund, F., 2009, Business Model Concepts in Corporate Sustainability Contexts. From Rhetoric to a Generic Template for ‘Business Models for Sustainability’. Lüneburg: Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Leuphana Universität Lüneburg.
  • Magretta, J., 2002, Why Business Models Matter, “Harvard Business Review”, 80.5: 86–92.
  • Magretta, J. Stone, N., 2002, What Management Is: How It Works and why it’s everyone’s Business, New York: Free Press.
  • Maris, B., 2015, Huellebecq economista, Milano: Bompiani.
  • Osterwalder, A., 2004, The Business model ontology – A proposition in a design science approach, Lausanne: University of Lausanne Publisher.
  • Pheby, J., 1988, Methodology and Economics. A Critical Introduction, New York: Routledge Publishers.
  • Polak, P., 2008, The unpredictability of the development of science and scientometric research, “Logos and Ethos“, 1.24: 73–82.
  • Porter, M., 1998, Competitive strategy: techniques for analysing industries and competitors, New York: The Free Press.
  • Rosenberg, A., 1992, Economics--Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Sales, T.P., Guarino, N., Guizzardi, G., and Mylopoulos, J., 2017, Towards an Ontological Analysis of Value Propositions. 11-th International Workshop on Value Modeling and Business Ontologies, The Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), March 6th – 7th 2017, available at: https://www.list.lu/fileadmin/files/Event/sites/tudor/files/Training_Center/OTHERS/VMBO2017_paper_13.pdf (access 19/05/17).
  • Sierotowicz, Tadeusz, 1997, Nauka a Wiara – przestrzeń dialogu (Eng. Science and faith – space for dialogue). Tarnow: Ed. Biblos Publisher.
  • Sierotowicz, Tomasz, 2013, Koncepcje modeli biznesowych organizacji działających w wirtualnej przestrzeni życia gospodarczego (Eng. The concepts of business models of organizations operating in the virtual space of economic life), “Management and Finance”, 11.1: 455–466.
  • Simon, H.A., 1996, The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed., Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
  • Solarz, J.K., 2015, Metoda porównawcza w dyscyplinie nauki ekonomii (Eng. Comparative method in the discipline of economic science), in: Fiedor, B., Ed., Nauki ekonomiczne. Stylizowane fakty a wyzwania współczesności, (Eng. Economic Sciences. Stylized facts and challenges of the present era), Warszawa: PTE.
  • Wieringa, R.J., 2014, Design science methodology for information systems and software engineering. London: Springer Verlag.
  • Wojtysiak-Kotlarski, M., 2011, O metodologii nauk ekonomicznych. Wybrane zagadnienia teoretyczce, rozmowy z przedstawicielami profesji. Warszawa: Ofi cyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  • Zott, Ch., Amit, R., 2007, Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firm, Organization Science”, 18.2: 181–199.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-e1ae40e1-d598-4f3c-85d8-e042be1df2f3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.