Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2016 | 41 | 237-261

Article title

„Sąsiedzi Europy i europejscy sąsiedzi”? Polityka rozszerzenia UE i Europejska Polityka Sąsiedztwa w debatach Sejmu 2004-2014

Authors

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

EN
“Europe’s neighbours and European neighbours”? EU enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy in Sejm’s debates 2004-2014

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
Main aim of this article is an analysis of discursive legitimising practices of selected EU policies. The study focuses on the Sejm’s debates in which the issue of EU Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy with special focus on Eastern Partnership (since 2008) were discussed between 2004 and 2014. The analysis answers the question which aspects of these policies are the most controversial today and why. How political actors perceive the future of the policies? Typical arguments used in debates concentrate on security, economic costs and benefits and the impact on the European integration. However in presented study special attention is paid to cultural, religious and identitarian arguments used by political actors.

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Jagielloński

References

  • Alexe D., The Juncker Commission: No Further EU Enlargement, The New Europe Online, 10 IX 2014, [online] http://www.neurope.eu/article/juncker-commission-no-further-euenlargement.
  • Auel K., Raunio T., Debating the State of the Union? Comparing Parliamentary Debates on EU Issues in Finland, France, Germany and the United Kingdom, „The Journal of Legislative Studies” 2014, Vol. 20, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2013.871482.
  • Bono G., Challenges of Democratic Oversight of EU Security Policies, „European Security” 2006, Vol. 15, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09662830701306037.
  • Brown Ch., Understanding International Relations, London 2001.
  • Carta C., Morin J.-F., Introduction, [w:] EU Foreign Policy through the Lens of Discourse Analysis. Making Sense of Diversity, red. ciż, Farnham 2014 , Globalization, Europe and Multilateralism.
  • CBOS, Komunikat z badań, BS/187/2004, Opinie o dalszym rozszerzeniu Unii Europejskiej, Warszawa, XII 2004.
  • Checkel J., Constructivism and Foreign Policy, [w:] Foreign Policy. Theories. Actors. Cases, red. S. Smith, A. Hadfield, T. Dunne, Oxford 2008.
  • Cooper I., A „Virtual Third Chamber” for the European Union? National Parliaments after the Treaty of Lisbon, „West European Politics” 2012, Vol. 35, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/1 0.1080/01402382.2012.665735.
  • Crum B., Fossum J.E., The Multilevel Parliamentary Field: A Framework for Theorizing Representative Democracy in the EU, „European Political Science Review” 2009, Vol. 1, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909000186.
  • Devrim D., Schulz E., Enlargement Fatigue in the European Union: From Enlargement to Many Unions, 2009, Elcano Royal Institute Working Papers, 13/2009.
  • Diez T., Europe as a Discursive Battleground: Discourse Analysis and European Integration Studies, „Cooperation and Conflict” 2001, Vol. 36, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00108360121962245.
  • Doyle M., Liberalism and Foreign Policy, [w:] Foreign Policy. Theories. Actors. Cases, red. S. Smith, A. Hadfield, T. Dunne, Oxford 2008.
  • EU Foreign Policy through the Lens of Discourse Analysis. Making Sense of Diversity, red. C. Carta, J.-F. Morin, Farnham 2014, Globalization, Europe and Multilateralism.
  • Eurobarometer, Standard Eurobarometer 80, Autumn 2013, Public opinion in the European Union, XII 2013, [online] http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb80/ eb80_first_en.pdf.
  • Góra M., Contesting EU Enlargement. Views from the European Parliament after 2004, [w:] Playing Second Fiddle? Contending Visions of Europe’s Future Development, red. H.-Å. Persson, B. Petersson, C. Stokholm Banke, Malmö 2015.
  • Góra M., Who Belongs to Europe? Perceptions of the Future EU Enlargement in Polish Society (w druku).
  • Góra M., Mach Z., Democracy and Identity in Europe after Enlargement, [w:] Collective Identity and Democracy in the Enlarging Europe, red. M. Góra, Z. Mach, K. Zielińska, Frankfurt am Main 2011, Warsaw Studies in Culture and Society, 1.
  • Góra M., Mach Z., Trenz H., Situating the Demos of European democracy?, [w:] Rethinking Democracy and European Union, red. E.O. Eriksen, J.E. Fossum, London 2011, Routledge Studies on Democratizing Europe, 7.
  • Góra M., Styczyńska N., The EU Enlargement Policy in the Polish Political Discourse after 2004, [w:] Европейският съюз – нов старт?, май 2015 г.: докпаgu om фmораmа межgунароgаmа конференцuя на Каmеgра „Ефроnеuсmuка”, Фuпософскu факупmеm, СУ „Св. Кпuменm Охрugскu”. The European Union – A New Start?, May 2015: Reports from the Second International Conference of the European Studies Department, Faculty of Philosophy at Sofia University „St. Kliment Ohridski”, Sofia 2015.
  • Góra M., Zielińska K., Crisis-driven Renationalisation of Discourse on the European Integration on the EUNew Member States (Polish Case Study). Referat na European Sociological Association 11th Conference: „Crisis, Critique and Change”, Turin, Italy, VIII 2013.
  • Góra M., Zielińska K., Return to „Normal Politics”: Desecuritisation and Conditionality after Enlargement in the EU’s New Member States. Referat prezentowany na Conference of European Consortium for Political Research, 3-6 IX 2014, Glasgow, Wielka Brytania.
  • Hansen L., Reconstructing Desecuritisation: The Normative Political in the Copenhagen School and Directions for How to Apply It, „Review of International Studies” 2012, Vol. 38, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000581.
  • Higashino A., For the Sake of „Peace and Security”?: The Role of Security in the European Union Enlargement Eastwards, „Cooperation and Conflict” 2004, Vol. 39, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010836704047579.
  • Hill Ch., The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy, London 2003.
  • Holsti O.R., Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates, „International Studies Quarterly” 1992, Vol. 36, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2600734.
  • Iceland Officially Drops EU Membership Bid, Euractiv, 13 III 2015, [online] http://www.euractiv.com/sections/enlargement/iceland-officially-drops-eu-membership-bid-312877.
  • Konarzewska A., Perspektywy przystąpienia Turcji do Unii Europejskiej, „Bezpieczeństwo Narodowe” 2006, nr 2.
  • Kuźniar R., Droga do wolności. Polityka zagraniczna III Rzeczypospolitej, Warszawa 2008.
  • Larsen H., Discourse Analysis in the Study of European Foreign Policy, [w:] Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy, red. B. Tonra, T. Christiansen, Manchester 2004, Europe in Change.
  • Maatsch A., Between an Intergovernmental and a Polycentric European Union: National Parliamentary Discourses on Democracy in the EU Ratification Process, 2010, RECON Online
  • Osiewicz P., Polskie stanowisko w sprawie członkostwa Turcji w Unii Europejskiej, „Przegląd Politologiczny” 2006, nr 2.
  • PBS, Rozszerzenie UE o Bułgarię, Chorwację, Rumunię, Turcję i Ukrainę. Sondaż PBS DGA dla „Gazety Wyborczej”, 16 V 2006, [online] http://pbs.pl/repository/files/Wyniki/2006-05/
  • rozszerzenie_ue_200605gw.pdf.
  • Peters D., Wagner W., Deitelhoff N., The Parliamentary Control of European Security Policy, Oslo 2008, ARENA Report, 7/08. RECON Report, 6.
  • Practices of Interparliamentary Coordination in International Politics. The European Union and beyond, red. B. Crum, J.E. Fossum, Colchester 2013, Studies in European Political Science.
  • Questioning EU Enlargement. Europe in search of identity, red. H. Sjursen, New York–London 2006, Routledge Studies on Democratising Europe, 3.
  • Raube K., European Parliamentary Oversight of Crisis Management, [w:] The European Union and Crisis Management. Policy and Legal Aspects, red. S. Blockmans, The Hague 2008.
  • Robinson P., The Role of Media and Public Opinion, [w:] Foreign Policy. Theories. Actors. Cases, red. S. Smith, A. Hadfield, T. Dunne, Oxford 2008.
  • Rola Polski w kształtowaniu polityki wschodniej Unii Europejskiej na przykładzie Ukrainy, red. J. Borkowski, Warszawa 2006.
  • Sanford G., Parliamentary Control and the Constitutional Definition of Foreign Policy Making in Democratic Poland, „Europe-Asia Studies” 1999, Vol. 51, nr 5, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668139998714.
  • Schmidt V.A., Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and „Throughput”, „Political Studies” 2001, Vol. 61, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x.post_962 2..22
  • Sikorski R., Przemówienie Ministra Radosława Sikorskiego „Polska a przyszłość Unii Europejskiej” na forum Niemieckiego Towarzystwa Polityki Zagranicznej, Berlin, 28 listopada 2011 r., [online] http://www.msz.gov.pl/resource/c2a33d88-7b8d-4fa5-8680-a67a4b2b38af:JCR.
  • Sjursen H., A Certain Sense of Europe? Defining the EU through Enlargement, „European Societies” 2012, Vol. 14, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2012.724576.
  • Sjursen H., The EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy: The Quest for Democracy, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2011, Vol. 18, nr 8, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501 763.2011.615192.
  • Stavridis S., The CFSP/ESDP, Parliamentary Accountability and the ‘Future of Europe’ Convention debate, [w:] Dossier El Parlamento Europeo en la Política Exterior, nr 01/2003.
  • Stemplowski W., Wprowadzenie do analizy polityki zagranicznej RP, Warszawa 2007.
  • Szolucha A., The EU and „Enlargement Fatigue”: Why Has the European Union Not Been Able to Counter „Enlargement Fatigue”?, „Journal of Contemporary European Research” 2006, Vol. 6, nr 1.
  • Thym D., Beyond Parliament’s Reach? The Role of the European Parliament in the CFSP, „European Foreign Affairs Review” 2006, Vol. 11.
  • Turcja i Europa. Wyzwania i szanse, red. A. Szymański, Warszawa 2011.
  • Urbanik A., Idea integracji Turcji z Unią Europejską w opiniach mieszkańców Pomorza Zachodniego, „Edukacja Humanistyczna” 2013, nr 2 (29).
  • Wagner W., The Democratic Control of Military Power Europe, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2006, Vol. 12, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501760500451626.
  • Wagner W., The Democratic Deficit in the EU’s Security and Defense Policy – Why Bother?, RECON Online Working Paper, 2007/10.
  • Wilde P. de, The Operating Logics of National Parliaments and Mass Media in the Politicisation of Europe, „The Journal of Legislative Studies” 2014, Vol. 20, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2013.871484.
  • Zając J., Efektywność ról międzynarodowych Unii Europejskiej, „Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej” 2014, nr 8, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/rie.2014.8.4.
  • Zając J., Unia Europejska wobec Arabskiej Wiosny, „Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe” 2013, R. 9, nr 1.
  • Zięba R., Uwarunkowania polityki zagranicznej Polski na początku drugiej dekady XXI wieku, „Stosunki Międzynarodowe” 2011, Vol. 43, nr 1/2.

Document Type

Publication order reference

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-e9eb3dbe-a98d-4a47-9858-8c5d052b3b77
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.