LEARNER AUTONOMY AS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT IN THE CONTEXT OF ITALKI

• Authors: Anna Turula
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article looks at language learner autonomy as a social construct in relation to the context and its user based on the example of Italki, a social networking site for tandem language learning. Considering the two foci – the context and the learner – the study is divided into two parts, both carried out from the perspective of online ethnography, each utilising different techniques and tools. Part 1, based on participatory observation and user experience of the author, was aimed at investigating the context of Italki as a language learning environment. Its affordances, noted in the course of the study, are analysed against the three aspects of social learner autonomy (Murray 2014): emotional, political, and spatial, in order to investigate the potential of Italki for interdependent learning. In Part 2 of the study, with its focus on the learner, the data were gathered by means of semi-structured open-ended interviews with Italki users (N=10). One of these interviews evolved into a case study, in which elements of social network analysis (SNA) were utilized to look at learner autonomy of an individual user. The results of the study indicate that learner autonomy in the digital age can be both self- and other-regulated; characterized by learner independence as well as interdependence. All this is very much promoted by new tendencies in language learning and affordances offered by the new media. At the same time, though, the nature of the autonomy exercised will, to a large extent, be determined by individual learner agendas, motives and attitudes.

Keywords

EN

learner autonomy; tandem learning; online ethnography

• Publisher: IATEFL Poland Computer Special Interest Group & University of Nicosia
• Journal: Teaching English with Technology
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 3-28

Contributors

author

Anna Turula

• Pedagogical University

References

• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
• Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and Researching Autonomy (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
• Cziko, G.A. (2004). Electronic tandem language learning (eTandem): A third approach to second language learning for the 21st century. CALICO Journal, 22(1), 25-39.
• Dam, L. (1995). Learner Autonomy 3: From Theory to Classroom Practice. Dublin: Authentik.
• Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow and the Feeling Brain. London: Vintage.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (eds.) (2002). Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (eds.), Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp. 9-42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2015). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Retrieved November 30, 2015, from http://people.uta.fi/~kljuham/2015-hamari_at_al-the_sharing_economy.pdf.
• Hauck, M., Fuchs, C., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2012). Promoting learner autonomy through multiliteracy skills development in cross-institutional exchanges. Language Learning and Technology, 16(3), 82-102.
• Holec, R. (1981). Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
• Huang, J., & Benson, P. (2013). Autonomy, agency and identity in foreign and second language education. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 7-28.
• Jin, L. & Cortazzi, M. (1998). Expectations and questions in intercultural classrooms, Intercultural Communication Studies, 7(2), 37-62.
• Legenhausen, L. (1999). Traditional and autonomous learners compared: the impact of classroom culture on communicative attitudes and behaviour. In C. Edelhoff and R. Weskamp (eds.), Autonomes Fremdsprachenlernen (pp. 166-82). Munich: Hueber.
• Little, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.
• Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue. The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-181.
• Little, D. (1999). Developing learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: a social-interactive view of learning and three fundamental pedagogical principles. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 38, 77-88.
• Little, D. (2002).Learner autonomy and second/foreign language learning. In: The guide to good practice for learning and teaching in languages, linguistics and area studies. University of Southampton: LTSN Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies. Retrieved November 30, 2015, from https://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/1409.
• Little, D. (2004). Constructing a theory of learner autonomy: Some steps along the way. In K. Mäkinen, P. Kaikkonen, & V. Kohonen (eds.), Future Perspectives in Foreign Language Education (pp. 15-25). Oulu: Publications of the Faculty of Education in Oulu University 101.
• Murray, G. (2014). The social dimensions of learner autonomy and self – regulated learning. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 5(4), 320–341.
• Murray, G., Gao, X., & Lamb, T. (eds.) (2011). Identity, Motivation and Autonomy in Language Learning. Bristol-Buffalo-Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
• Oh, S. & Syn, S. J. (2015). Motivations for sharing information and social support in social media: A comparative analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, YouTube, and Flickr. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2045-2060.
• O’Leary, C. (2014). Developing autonomous language learners in HE: A social constructivist perspective. In G. Murray (ed.), Social Dimensions of Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 15-36). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
• Oxford, R.L. (2003) Towards a systematic model of L2 learner autonomy. In D. Palfreyman and R.C. Smith (eds.), Learner Autonomy Across Cultures: Language Education Perspectives (pp. 75-91). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Palfreyman, D. (2003). Expanding the discourse on learner development: A reply to Anita Wenden. Applied Linguistics, 24 (2), 243-248.
• Palfreyman, D. (2006). Social context and resources for language learning. System, 34(3), 352-370.
• Ryan, S. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557-1585.
• Richards, K. (2006). ‘Being the Teacher’: Identity and classroom conversation. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 51-77.
• Richardson, W., & Mancabelli, R. (2011). Personal Learning Networks. Using the Power of Connections to Transform Education. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
• Sade, L. A. (2011). Emerging selves, language learning and motivation through the lens of chaos. In G. Murray, X. Gao, & T. Lamb (eds.), Identity, Motivation and Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 42-56). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Turula, A. (2006). Language Anxiety and Classroom Dynamics. The Study of an Adult Beginner. Bielsko Biała: Wydawnictwo Naukowe ATH.
• Ushioda, E. (2006) Language motivation in a reconfigured Europe: Access, identity, autonomy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27(2), 148-161.
• Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dörnyei and E. Ushioda (eds.), Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp. 215-228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Ushioda, E. (2011) Motivating learners to speak as themselves. In G. Murray, X. Gao and T. Lamb (eds.), Identity, Motivation and Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 11-24). Bristol-Buffalo-Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
• Ushioda, E., & Dörnyei, Z. (2012). Motivation. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 396-409). New York: Routledge.
• Yashima, T. (2002) Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54-66.
• Zimmerman, B. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135-147.