PLAYPOSIT: USING INTERACTIVE VIDEOS IN LANGUAGE EDUCATION (App Review)

• Authors: Shahrokni Seyed Abdollah
• Languages of publication: EN

Keywords

EN

review; apps; mobile learning

• Publisher: IATEFL Poland Computer Special Interest Group & University of Nicosia
• Journal: Teaching English with Technology
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 18
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 105-115

Contributors

author

Shahrokni Seyed Abdollah

• Washington State University

References

• Bird, S. A., & Williams, J. N. (2002). The effect of bimodal input on implicit and explicit memory: An investigation into the benefits of within-language subtitling. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(4), 509-533.
• Borrás, I., & Lafayette, R. C. (1994). Effects of multimedia courseware subtitling on the speaking performance of college students of French. Modern Language Journal, 78(1), 61-75.
• Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook I, Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans, Green.
• Brown, D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson.
• Choi, H. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2007). The effect of problem-based video instruction on learner satisfaction, comprehension and retention in college courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 885-895.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
• Danan, M. (1992). Reversed subtitling and dual coding theory: New directions for foreign language instruction. Language Learning, 42(4), 497-527.
• Davey, R., & Parkhill, F. (2012). Raising adolescent reading achievement: The use of sub-titled popular movies and high interest literacy activities. English in Aotearoa, 78, 61-71.
• Egbert, J. (2004). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60(5), 549-586.
• Egbert, J. (2007). Asking useful questions: Goals, engagement, and differentiation in technology-enhanced language learning. Teaching English with Technology, 7(1), 1-17.
• Egbert, J. (2009). Supporting Learning with Technology: Essentials of Classroom Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• Erbaggio, P., Gopalakrishnan, S., Hobbs, S., & Liu, H. (2012). Enhancing student engagement through online authentic materials. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 42(2), 27-51.
• Farhady, H., Jafarpur, A., & Birjandi, P. (1994). Testing Language Skills: From Theory to Practice. Tehran: SAMT Publications.
• Gernsbacher, M. A. (2015). Video captions benefit everyone. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 195-202.
• Hafner, C. A. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students' digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 655-685.
• Healey, D., Hegelheimer, V., Hubbard, P., Ioannou-Georgiou, S., Kessler, G., & Ware, P. (2008). TESOL Technology Standards Framework. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
• Hoven, D. (1999). A model for listening and viewing comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 88-103.
• Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J., Chang, Y.-T., & Chang, C.-K. (2013). Effects of video caption modes on English listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition using handheld devices. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 403-414.
• Hsu, J. (1994). Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL): The Effect of ESL Students’ Use of Interactional Modifications on Listening Comprehension (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
• Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
• Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York, NY: Laredo Publishing Company.
• Lantolf, J. P. & S. L. Thorne (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Mackey, T. P., & Ho, J. (2008). Exploring the relationships between web usability and students’ perceived learning in web-based multimedia (WBMM) tutorials. Computers & Education, 50(1), 386-409.
• Markham, P. L., & Peter, L. (2003). The influence of English language and Spanish language captions on foreign language listening/reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 31(3), 331-341.
• Mirvan, X. (2013). The advantages of using films to enhance student’s reading skills in the EFL classroom. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(13), 62-66.
• Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. (2014). Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 118-141.
• Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25-36.
• Seo, K. (2002). The effect of visuals on listening comprehension: A study of Japanese learners’ listening strategies. International Journal of Listening, 16(1), 57-81.
• Shih, R. (2010). Blended learning using video-based blogs: Public speaking for English as a second language students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 883-897.
• Vanderplank, R. (2016). ‘Effects of’ and ‘effects with’ captions: How exactly does watching a TV programme with same-language subtitles make a difference to language learners? Language Teaching, 49(2), 235-250.
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Wang, Z. (2014). An analysis on the use of video materials in college English teaching in China. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 23.
• Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.