Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2016 | Tom: 6 | Numer: 2 | 475-492

Article title

Czy wnioski z eksperymentów naukowych badających wolną wolę są uzasadnione? Przegląd i analiza krytyki eksperymentów Benjamina Libeta i Johna-Dylana Haynesa

Content

Title variants

EN
Are the conclusions of the scientific experiments investigating free will justified? The analysis of the criticism concerning Libet’s and Haynes’ experiments

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
Scientific experiments which try to examine free will are faced with various critical arguments — both philosophical and methodological. In this article I will present the most important and the most interesting critical arguments attacking two the most influential experiments: Benjamin Libet experiment and John‐Dylan Haynes experiment. In the first part of the article I will consider a particular criticism of Libet paradigm, which loses its importance in context of Haynes paradigm. Next I will present critical arguments which attack both Haynes and Libet experiments (and probably all other psychophysiological experiments facing free will problem). Because of this analysis I will consider informative value of presented experiments in context of existence of free will.

Year

Volume

Issue

Pages

475-492

Physical description

Dates

published
2016

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

References

  • Banks, W. P. & Isham, E. A. (2009). We infer rather than perceive the moment we decided to act. Psychological Science, 20, 17–21.
  • Bayne, T. (2011). Libet and the case for free will scepticism (s. 25–46). W: R. Swinburne (Red.). Free will and modern science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bremer, J. (2013). Czy wolna wola jest wolna? Kompatybilizm na tle badań interdyscyplinarnych.Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.
  • Fisher, J. M. (2007). Compatibilism (s. 44–84). W: J. M. Fisher, R. Kane, D. Pereboom, & M. Vargas (Red.). Four views on free will. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell.
  • Franklin, Ch. E. (2011). Farewell to the luck (and mind) argument. Philosophical Studies, 156,199–230.
  • Fried, I., Mukamel, R., & Kreiman, G. (2011). Internally generated preactivation of single neurons in human medial frontal cortex predicts volition. Neuron, 69, 548–562.
  • Haggard, P. & Eimer, M. (1999). On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 128–133. Dostęp: http://brainb.psyc.bbk.ac.uk/PDF/LIBET.PDF (22.12.2016).
  • Haynes, J.‑D., Sakai, K., Rees, G., Gilbert, S., Frith, Ch., & Passingham, R. E. (2007).Reading hidden intentions in the human brain. Current Biology, 17, 323–328. Dostęp: http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/executive_functions/pubs/Haynes%202007%20curr%20biol.pdf (22.12.2016).
  • Herrmann, Ch. S., Pauen, M., Min, B.‑K., Busch, N. A., & Rieger, J. W. (2008). Analysis of a choice‑reaction task yields a new interpretation of Libet’s experiments. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 67(2), 151–157. Dostęp: http://www.fflch.usp.br/df/opessoa/Hermann%20‑%20New%20interpretation%20‑%20%202008.pdf (22.12.2016).
  • Kane, R. (1999). Responsibility, luck, and chance: Reflections on free will and indeterminism. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(5), 217–240. Dostęp: http://www.shef.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.101524!/file/KaneResponsibilty‑luck‑chance.pdf (22.12.2016).
  • Keller, I., Heckhausen, H. (1990). Readiness potentials preceding spontaneous motor acts: Voluntary vs. involuntary control. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 76(4),351–361.
  • Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(4), 529–566. Dostęp: http://selfpace.uconn.edu/class/ccs/Libet1985UcsCerebralInitiative.pdf (22.12.2016).
  • Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness‑potential): The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 106, 623–642. Dostęp: http://www.trans‑techresearch.net/wp‑content/uploads/2015/05/Brain‑1983‑LIBET.pdf (22.12.2016).
  • Miller, J., Shepherdson, P., & Travena, J. (2011). Effects of clock monitoring on electroencephalographic activity: Is unconscious movement initiation an artifact of the clock?. Psychological Science, 22, 103–109.
  • Nichols, Sh. & Knobe, J. (2007). Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuition. Nous, 41(4), 663–685. Dostęp: http://www.pgrim.org/philosophersannual/pa27articles/nicholsknobe.pdf (22.12.2016).
  • Pockett, S. (2011). Initiation of intentional actions and the electromagnetic field theory of consciousness. Humana.Mente, 15, 159–175. Dostęp: http://www.humanamente.eu/PDF/Issue15_Paper_Pockett.pdf (22.12.2016).
  • Pockett, S. & Purdy, S. C. (2010). Are voluntary movements initiated preconsciously? The relationships between readiness potentials, urges, and decisions (s. 34–46). W: W. Sinnott‑Armstrong & L. Nadel (Red.). Conscious will and responsibility: A tribute to Benjamin Libet.New York: Oxford University Press. Dostęp: https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/about/our‑people/documents/sue‑pockett/pockett‑purdy‑2010.pdf (22.12.2016).
  • Rigoni, D., Brass, M., & Sartiori, G. (2010). Post‑action determinants of the reported time of conscious intentions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 38.
  • Schlegel, A., Alexander, P., Sinnott‑Armstrong, W., Roskies, A., Tse, P. U., & Wheatley, T. (2013). Barking up the wrong free: Readiness potentials reflect processes independent of conscious will. Experimental Brain Research, 229(3), 329–335.
  • Schlegel, A., Alexander, P., Sinnott‑Armstrong, W., Roskies, A., Tse, P. U., & Wheatley, T. (2015). Hypnotizing Libet: Readiness potentials with non‑conscious volition. Conscioussness and Cognition, 33, 196–203. Dostęp: http://www.alexschlegel.com/static/roguecheddarapp/files/papers/schlegel_2015_hypnotizing_libet.pdf (22.12.2016).
  • Smart, J. J. C. (1961). Free will, praise and blame. Mind, 70(279), 291–306.
  • Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H.‑J., & Haynes, J.‑D. (2008). Uncounscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 11(5), 543–545. Dostęp: http://www.rifters.com/real/articles/NatureNeuroScience_Soon_et_al.pdf (22.12.2016).
  • Soon, C. S., He, A. H., Bode, S., & Haynes, J.‑D. (2013). Predicting free choices for abstract intentions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 110(15), 6217–6222. Dostęp: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3625266/ (22.12.2016).
  • Trevena, J. A. & Miller, J. (2002). Cortical movement preparation before and after a conscious decision to move. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 162–190. Dostęp: https://unites.uqam.ca/cnc/.Harnad/PSY557B‑2007/LIBET/17miller‑terevena.pdf (22.12.2016).

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-fa2d422f-80c1-4df8-a9ae-c10f74fbb0cf
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.