Teacher’s and student’s competence beliefs according to scenario theory

• Authors: Michal Čerešník
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article is connected with the problem of personal teacher’s and student’s competence, resp. saturation of need for competence, which reflects our desire to sense that our activity, abilities and effort are crucial for our impression that we influence our environment, for our feeling that we are respectable people. We are interested mainly in the problem of perceived control in the context of specific scenario teacher-student.

Keywords

EN

teacher`s/student`s competence; control; scenario

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Acta Technologica Dubnicae
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 38-46

Dates

published

2011-07-01

online

2015-07-14

Contributors

author

Michal Čerešník

• Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Faculty of Education, Department of Pedagogy and School Psychology, Slovakia

References

• BOESCH, E. E. 1976. Psychopathologie des alltags. Bern: Huber, 1976. 525 p.
• CONNELL, J. P., WELLBORN, J. G. 1991. Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In GUNNAR, M., SROUFE, A. (eds.) Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, p. 43-77.
• DECHARMS, R. 1968. Personal causation. New York: Academic Press, 1968. 398 p.
• DECHARMS, R. 1981. Personal causation and locus of control: Two different traditions and two uncorrelated constructs. In LEFCOURT, H. M. (ed.) Research with the locus of control constructs: Vol. 1 Assessment and methods. San Diego: Academic Press, 1981, p. 337-358.
• DECI, E. L. 1975. Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum, 1975. 324 p.
• DECI, E. L., RYAN, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum, 1985. 332 p.
• FRESE, M., SABINI, J. (eds.) 1985. Goal-directed behavior: The concept of action in psychology. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1985. 440 p.
• GOFFMAN, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1959. 260 p.
• HARTER, S. 1978. Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a development model. In Human Development, vol. 21, 1978, n. 1, p. 36-64.
• KOESTER, R., MCCLELLAND, D. C. 1990. Perspectives on competence motivation. In PERVIN, L. A. (ed.) Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford, 1990, p. 527-548.
• KOMÁRIK, E. 2001. K vymedzeniu pojmu edifikácia v kontexte sociálnej pedagogiky. In PETLÁK, E. (ed.) Premeny slovenského školstva na prahu nového milénia. Nitra: PF UKF, 2001, p. 182-191.
• LEFCOURT, H. M. 1982. Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research. New York: John Wiley, 1982. 288 p.
• LEVENSON, H. 1973. Perceived parental antecedents of internal, powerful others, and chance locus of control orientations. In Developmental psychology, vol. 9, 1973, n. 2, p. 260-265.
• MOLDOVEANU, M., LANGER, E. 2004. Keď je „hlupák“ bystrejší. Hlúpi sú tí druhí. In STERNBERG, R. (ed.) Prečo robia múdri ľudia hlúposti. Bratislava: Ikar, 2004, p. 247-268.
• SKINNER, E. A. 1995. Perceived control, motivation and coping. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1995. 232 p.
• WHITE, R. W. 1959. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. In Psychological review, vol. 55, 1959, n. 5, p. 297-333.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/atd-2015-0038