Motivations, Results and the Role of Technology in Participatory Design Research during 2000’s – a Review in the Field of Architecture and Urban Planning

• Authors: Teija Vainio
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This study analyses motivations, results and technology of the participatory design approach. It is a review based on 32 papers, presenting recent studies on participatory design in architecture and urban planning during the time period from 2000 to 2014. As a result, the main motivations, outcomes and the role of technology are emphasised and discussed. Furthermore, recommendations for future research directions for participatory design research in the field of urban planning are also provided.

Keywords

EN

Design research; review; participatory design

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Architecture and Urban Planning
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 11
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 14-18

Dates

published

2016-07-01

online

2016-09-18

Contributors

author

Teija Vainio

• The School of Management, University of Tampere

References

• Haggar, J., Ayala, A., Daz, B., Reyes, C. U. Participatory design of agroforestry systems : Developing farmer participatory research methods in Mexico. Development in Practice, Vol. 11, Issue 4, August 2001, p. 417–424.
• Kaufman, S., Ozawa, C. P., Shmueli, D. F. Evaluating participatory decision processes: Which methods inform reflective practice? Evaluation and Program Planning, February 2014, Vol. 42, p. 11–20.
• Finnish Land Use and Building Act 132/1999 [cited 10.10.2015].
• Brown-Sica, M. Using Academic Courses to Generate Data for Use in Evidence Based Library Planning. Journal of Academic Librarianship, May 2013, Vol. 39, Issue 3, p. 275–287.
• Woolner, P., Hall, E., Wall, K., Dennison, D. Getting together to improve the school environment : User consultation, participatory design and student voice. Improving Schools, 2007, Vol. 10, Issue 3, p. 233–248.
• Medrano, J., Spinelli, J. Urban policies and projects for social housing in central areas. The case of the Habitasampa competition (São Paulo, Brazil). Habitat International, 2014, Vol. 42, p. 39–47.
• Aditya, T. Usability issues in applying participatory mapping for neighbourhood infrastructure planning. Transactions in GIS, 2010, Vol. 14, Issue 1, p. 119–147.
• Spinuzzi, C. The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication, Vol. 52, Issue 2, May 2005, p. 163–174.
• Bodker, S., Ehn, P., Kammersgaard, J., Kyng, M., Sundblad, Y. A utopian experience : On design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphic workers. Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge, London: Gower, 1987. p. 251–278.
• Holone, H., Herstad, J. Rhyme : musicking for all. Journal of Assistive Technologies, Vol. 7, Issue 2, 2013, p. 93–101.
• Zhai, B., Ng, M. K. Urban regeneration and social capital in China : A case study of the Drum Tower Muslim District in Xi’an. Cities, Vol. 35, December 2013, p. 14–25.
• Bjorgvinsson, E. B. Open-ended participatory design as prototypical practice. CoDesign, Vol. 4, Issue 2, June 2008, p. 85–99.
• Yi, H., Yang, J. Research trends of post disaster reconstruction : The past and the future. Habitat International, Vol. 42, April 2014, p. 21–29.
• Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Khalil, M. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 80, 2007, p. 571–583.
• Kitchenham, B. Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews, Keele [cited 10.09.2015].
• Barros, C. P., Chivangue, A. Samagaio, A. Urban dynamics in Maputo, Mozambique. Cities, Vol. 36, February 2014, p. 74–82.
• Alnsour, J., Meaton, J. Housing conditions in Palestinian refugee camps, Jordan. Cities, Vol. 36, February 2014, p. 65–73.
• Walker, H., Sinclair, J., Spaling, H. Public participation in and learning through SEA in Kenya. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 45, February 2014, p. 1–9.
• Martinez-Paz, J., Pellicer-Martinez, F., Colino, J. A probabilistic approach for the socioeconomic assessment of urban river rehabilitation projects. Land Use Policy, Vol. 36, 2014, p. 468–477.
• Edwards, V. M., Smith, S. Lessons from the Application of Decision-support Tools in Participatory Management of the New Forest National Park, UK. Environmental Policy and Governance, Vol. 21, 2011, p. 417–432.
• McIntyre, A. Constructing Meaning About Violence, School, and Community : Participatory Action Research with Urban Youth. The Urban Review, Vol. 32, Issue 2, June 2000, p. 123–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005181731698
• Bussu, S., Bartels, K. P. R. Facilitative Leadership and the Challenge of Renewing Local Democracy in Italy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 36, Issue 6, 2014, p. 2256–2273.
• Doherty, V., Croft, D., Knight, A. Environmental information for military planning. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 44, Issue 6, 2013. p. 866–873.
• Zheng, H. W., Shen, G. Q., Wang, H. A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal. Habitat International, Vol. 41, 2014, p. 272–279.
• Berkel, D. B. van, Verburg, P. H. Combining exploratory scenarios and participatory backcasting: Using an agent-based model in participatory policy design for a multi-functional landscape. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 27, 2014, p. 641–658.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/aup-2016-0002