How Far Can Citizens Influence the Decision-Making Process? Analysis of the Effectiveness of Referenda in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary in 1989–2015

• Authors: Elżbieta Kużelewska
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article explores the political role of a referendum in Central European countries, in particular in Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic. In this article, political effectiveness is understood as a possibility to influence the decision-making process by citizens through a referendum. The transformation of political systems in Central European states from socialist/communist to democratic ones resulted in increasing interest in the notion of referendum, one of the common forms of direct democracy. However, most referenda have been abused for political purposes. The focus of this article is a referendum used at the national level. This study examines the use of a referendum in Central European states from 1989 to 2015. The database presents, country by country, the subject matter of voting, people’s participation and the results in order to show the citizens’ opportunity (or lack of it) to express their opinions and to contribute to policy-making by circumventing the standard legislative process. The aim of this paper is to analyze referenda in the selected countries and to verify two hypotheses. Firstly, the weak use of a referendum and a small size of complementation of representative democracy. Secondly, the citizens’ belief in a referendum as an element of communication and consultation between authorities and society.

Keywords

EN

Czech Republic; direct democracy; Hungary; participation; referendum; Slovakia

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of European Studies
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 171-196

Dates

published

2015-10-01

online

2015-10-15

Contributors

author

Elżbieta Kużelewska

• Centre for Direct Democracy Studies, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law, University of Białystok ul. Mickiewicza 1, Białystok 15-213, Poland

References

• Altman, D. (2014), Direct Democracy Worldwide, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Arató, K. (2005), ‘EU referendum in Hungary,’ in J.-M. de Waele (ed.) European Union Accession Referendums, Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, pp. 43-64.
• Baun, M.; Dür, J.; Marek, D. & Šaradín, P. (2006), ‘The Europeanization of Czech Politics: The Political Parties and the EU Referendum,’ Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 249-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00622.x
• Belko, M. & Kopeček, L. (2003), ‘Referendum in theory and practice: the history of the Slovak referendums and their consequences,’ Central European Political Studies Review, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 193-201.
• Bentham, J. (2001[1891]), A Fragment on Government, Union, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.
• Black, J. L. (2000), Russia Faces NATO Expansion: Bearing Gifts or Bearing Arms? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Bookman, M. Z. (1994), ‘War and Peace: The Divergent Breakups of Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia,’ Journal of Peace Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 175-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343394031002005
• Bowler, S.; Donovan, T. & Karp, J. A. (2007), ‘Enraged or engaged? Preferences for direct citizens participation in affluent democracies,’ Political Research Quarterly, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 351-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1065912907304108
• Brodziński, W. (2012), Nowa konstytucja Republiki Węgierskiej (wprowadzenie do dyskusji), Lecture at the conference ‘Aktualne problemy reform konstytucyjnych. 54. Zjazd Katedr Prawa Konstytucyjnego’, 12 May. Retrieved from www.54zjazdkatedr.uwb.edu.pl/images/referaty/nowa_konstytucja_republiki_ wegierskiej.pdf [accessed 7 Apr 2015]
• Brzesina, P. (2012), ‘From apathy to protest: How the EU’s legitimacy is fading?’ in E. Kużelewska & D. Kloza (eds.) The Challenges of Modern Democracy and European Integration, European Democracy and Integration Series, Warszawa- Białystok: University of Białystok, pp. 37-62.
• Butler, O. (2007), ‘Hungary and the European Union: The political implications of societal security promotion,’ Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 1115-1144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668130701607102
• Constitution of the Czech Republic (1992), Ústavní soud České republiky, No. 1/1993 Coll., 16 December 2011.
• Constitution of the Slovak Republic (1992), Ústava Slovenskej republiky, No. 460/1992 Coll., 1 September 1992.
• Csnik, L. (2013), ‘Tendencies of direct democracy in Hungary - referendums in a new basic law,’ Iustum Aequum Salutare, vol. 4, pp. 59-64.
• ČSǓ (n.d.), Czech Statistical Office. Retrieved from http://www.volby.cz/pls/ref2003/re12?xjazyk=EN [accessed 30 May 2015]
• Dahl, R. A. (2000), On Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.
• -- (1971), Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven: Yale University Press.
• de Vreese, C. H. & Semetko, H. A. (2004), Political Campaigning in Referendums: Framing the Referendum Issue, London & New York, Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203335031
• de Waele, J.-M. (2005), ‘From membership referendums to European elections,’ in J.-M. de Waele (ed.) European Union Accession Referendums, Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, pp. 7-22.
• Fölsz, A. & Tóka, G. (2006), ‘Determinants of support for EU-membership in Hungary,’ in R. Rohrschneider & S. Whitefield (eds.) Public Opinion, Party Competition, and European Union in Post-Communist Europe, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 145-164.
• Fundamental Law of Hungary (2011), Magyarország Alaptörvénye, Government of Hungary, 18 April 2011.
• Glajcar, R. (2004), Instytucja Prezydenta w Polsce, Czechach i Słowacji w latach 1989-2000, Toruń: Adam Marszałek.
• Goldman, M. F. (1996), Revolution and Change in Central and Eastern Europe: Political, Economic and Social Challenges, New York: M. E. Sharp, Inc.
• Gyárfášová, O. (2004), ‘Perceptions of European integration in Slovakia,’ Etniškumo studijos / Ethnicity studies, pp. 69-81. Retrieved from http://www.ces.lt/wpcontent/uploads/2012/03/EtSt_Gyarfasova_2004.pdf [accessed 2 Apr 2015]
• Hacker, P. (2010), Slovakia on the Road to Independence. An American Diplomat’s Eyewitness Account, University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
• Hanley, S. (2003), ‘Referendum Briefing No. 6. The Czech EU Accession Referendum 13-14 June 2003.’ Retrieved from Opposing Europe Research Network, https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=epern-ref-no-6. pdf&site=266 [accessed 12 Feb 2015]
• -- (2004), ‘A nation of sceptics? The Czech EU Accession Referendum of 13-14 June 2003,’ West European Politics, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 691-715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0140238042000249867
• Haughton, T. (2002), ‘Vladimír Mečiar and his role in the 1994-1996 Slovak coalition government,’ Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1319-1338. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/0966813022000025907
• -- (2003), ‘Facilitator and impeder: the institutional framework of Slovak politics during the premiership of Vladimír Mečiar,’ The Slavonic and East European Review, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 267-290.
• Henderson, K. (2003), ‘Referendum Briefing No. 7. The Slovak EU Referendum Accession Referendum 16017 May 2003.’ Retrieved from European Parties Election and Referendum Networks, https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=epern-ref-no-7.pdf&site=266 [accessed 8 Apr 2015]
• Howler, B. (2003), ‘Referendum Briefing No. 4. The Hungarian EU Accession Referendum 12 April 2003,’ Retrieved from Opposing Europe Research Network, https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=epern-ref-no-4.pdf&site=266 [accessed 12 Feb 2015]
• Illner, M.; Čermák, D.; Kostelecký, T. & Stachová, J. (2006), ‘EU accession and the public sphere in new member states: the case of the Czech Republic,’ in L. Giorgi, I. von Homeyer & W. Parsons (eds.) Democracy in the European Union. Towards the Emergence of the Public Sphere, London, etc.: Routledge, pp. 157-180.
• Jahn, D. & Storsved, A. S. (1995), ‘Legitimacy through referendum? The nearly successful domino-Strategy of the EU-referendums in Austria, Finland, Sweden and Norway,’ West European Politics, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 18-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402389508425105
• Kovács, M. M. & Tóth, J. (2009), ‘Kin-state responsibility and ethnic citizenship: the Hungarian case,’ in R. Bauböck, B. Perchinig & W. Sievers (eds.) Citizenship Policies in the New Europe, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 135-159.
• Krejči, O. (2005), Geopolitics of the Central European Region: The View from Prague and Bratislava, Bratislava: The Institute of Political Sciences.
• Krenzler, H. G. & Krok-Paszkowska, A. (2003), ‘Public attitudes towards the EU in candidate countries,’ Policy Paper, vol. 2. Retrieved from http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/24117/Krenzler.pdf?sequence=1 [accessed 4 Jan 2015]
• Kusa, Z. (2005), ‘The accession referendum in Slovakia,’ in J.-M. de Waele (ed.) European Union Accession Referendums, Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, pp. 113-138.
• Kusý, M. (1999), ‘Does the rule of law (Rechtsstaat) exist in Slovakia?,’ in J. Přibáň & J. Young (eds.) The Rule of Law in Central Europe: The Reconstruction of Legality, Constitutionalism and Civil Society in the Post-Communist Countries, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 101-117.
• Kużelewska, E. (2006), Referendum w procesie integracji europejskiej, Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Aspra.
• -- (2014), ‘Referendum in the Czech Republic and Slovakia,’ Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio K Politologia, vol. XXI (1), pp. 97-110.
• Locke, J. (1689), Two Treatises of Government, London: Awnsham Churchill.
• Lucas, J. R. (1976), Democracy and Participation, Harmondsworth: Pelican.
• Lyons, P. (2007), “‘It’s the economy, stupid!’ Popular support for EU accession in the Czech Republic,” Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 523-560. Retrieved from http://sreview.soc.cas.cz/uploads/41d089843a069931be48b5c846f09e56b4ae4246_511_3-07%20lyons.pdf [accessed 8 Mar 2015]
• Minkenberg, M. (2015), Transforming the Transformation? The East European Radical Right in the Political Process, Abingdon: Routledge.
• Musiał-Karg, M. & Lesiewicz, E. (2015), “Direct democracy in the Visegrad Group countries in the context of the Central and Eastern Europe’s experiences and membership of the EU - selected issues,” in A. Piekutowska & I. Wrońska (eds.), Ten Years of the Visegrad Group Member States in the European Union, Warszawa: IVF, pp. 169-184.
• Perottino, M. (2005), “The Czech accession referendum: ‘yes’, but no passion,” in J.-M. de Waele (ed.) European Union Accession Referendums. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, pp. 23-30.
• Pettersen, P. A.; Jenssen, A. T. & Listhaug, O. (1996), ‘The 1994 referendum in Norway: continuity and change,’ Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 257-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.1996.tb00393.x
• Podolak, M. (2008), ‘Referenda na Słowacji,’ in S. B. Krajewski (ed.) Polska, Europa, Świat, Lublin: Wyd. UMCS, pp. 223-241.
• -- (2009), ‘Referenda w Europie Środkowej i Wschodniej,’ in M. Barański (ed.) Modernizacja polityczna w teorii i praktyce. Doświadczenia państw postsocjalistycznych i Trzeciego Świata, Katowice: Śląsk Wydawnictwo, pp. 213-234.
• -- (2010), ‘Referenda na Węgrzech. Teoria i praktyka polityczna,’ in H. Chałupczak, M. Pietraś & P. Tosiek (eds.) Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia w procesie transformacji i integracji. Wymiar polityczny, Zamość, pp. 275-290.
• -- (2014), Instytucja referendum w wybranych państwach Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej (1989-2012), Lublin: Wyd. UMCS.
• Pridham, G. (2002), “The European Union’s democratic conditionality and domestic politics in Slovakia: the Mečiar and Dzurinda governments compared,” Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 203-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668130120116583
• Reti, P. (2004), ‘Hungary,’ in B. Kaufmann & M. D. Waters (eds.) Direct Democracy in Europe. A Comprehensive Reference Guide to the Initiative and Referendum Process in Europe, Durham: Carolina Academic Press, pp. 67-70.
• Rousseau, J. J. (2003[1762]), On the Social Contract, Book II, New York: Dover Publications.
• Rytel-Warzocha, A. (2011), Referendum ogólnokrajowe w państwach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, Warszawa: Wydaw. Sejmowe.
• Rytkó, E. (2008), ‘National referenda in Hungary,’ Lecture at the 17th Annual Conference of the ACEEEO (Association of European Election Officials), 13 September. Retrieved from aceproject.org/regions-en/countries-and-territories/HU/reports/ hungary-report-on-the-national-referendum-2008 [accessed 7 Mar 2015]
• Sawicki, A. (2013), “Referendum Campaign on Slovak Republic’s Accession to the European Union,” Politické vedy/ Political Sciences, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 65-84. Retrieved from http://www.politickevedy.fpvmv.umb.sk/userfiles/file/4_2013/SAWICKI.pdf [accessed 27 Apr 2015]
• Schalk and Kopf v. Austria [2010], Application no. 30141/04, Judgment of 24.06.2010.
• Schumpeter, J. (1950), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd edition, New York: Harper and Row.
• Simon, J. (2003), Hungary and NATO: Problems in civil-military relations, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
• Skotnicki, K. (2000), System konstytucyjny Czech, Warszawa: Wydaw. Sejmowe.
• Suksi, M. (1993), Bringing in the People: A Comparison of the Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
• Tucker, J. A.; Pacek, A. C. & Berinsky, A. J. (2002), ‘Transitional winners and losers: attitudes towards EU membership in post-communist countries,’ American Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 557-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3088399
• Valach, M. (2004), ‘Czech Republic,’ in B. Kaufmann & M. D. Waters (eds.) Direct Democracy in Europe. A Comprehensive Reference Guide to the Initiative and Referendum Process in Europe, Durham: Carolina Academic Press, pp. 48-51.
• Zieliński, E. (2003), ‘Referendum w Czechach, Słowacji, Słowenii i na Węgrzech,’ in E. Zieliński, I. Bokszczanin & J. Zieliński (eds.) Referendum w państwach Europy, Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Aspra, pp. 55-80.
• Zlinszky, J. & Sik, M. (1996), ‘Constitutional justice and democracy by referendum in Hungary,’ in Constitutional Justice and Democracy by Referendum: Proceedings of the UniDem Seminar Organized in Strasbourg, on 23-24 June 1995 in cooperation with the “Institut Des Hautes Études Européennes” of Strasbourg, Robert Schuman University, and with the Support of the European Union, Council of Europe.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/bjes-2015-0019