Is the Czech Republic on its Way to Semi-Presidentialism?

• Authors: Vít Hloušek
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The main aim of the article is to contribute to the bourgeoning debate on semipresidentialism, its definition, and its characteristic features, with analysis of the empirical example of the Czech Republic, a country which, according to Elgie´s standard definition, shifted to semi-presidentialism in 2012. The author investigates whether and how Miloš Zeman, the first directly elected president of the Czech Republic, influences relations among the key political institutions in the direction of the model of a semi-presidential democracy. The paper sets out the working concept of semi-presidentialism first and, through the lenses of process tracing, analyses the goals and acts of Zeman after he entered office in January 2013. The case study of the Czech Republic sheds light not only on the recent development(s) in the Czech political system, but it can be seen as an interesting example of how strong political personalities are attempting to expand their influence on politics in a parliamentary democracy and what the possible limits of this effort are.

Keywords

EN

Czech Republic; semi-presidentialism; parliamentary democracy; Miloš Zeman

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 95-118

Dates

published

2014-12-01

received

2014-10-10

accepted

2014-12-23

online

2015-03-11

Contributors

author

Vít Hloušek

• Associate Professor Masaryk University, Faculty of Social Sciences (Czech Republic)

References

• 1. Beach, Derek, and Rasmus Brun Pedersen. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.
• 2. Checkel, Jeffrey T. “Process Tracing”: 114-127. In: Audie Klotz and Deepa Prakash, eds. Qualitative methods in international relations: a pluralist guide. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
• 3. Cheibub, José Antonio. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
• 4. Cheibub, José Antonio, Zachary Elins, and Tom Ginsburg. “Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism.” British Journal of Political Science Vol. 44, No. 3 (2014): 515-544 // DOI: 10.1017/S000712341300032X.[WoS][Crossref]
• 5. Duverger, Maurice. “A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential”: 142-149. In: Arend Lijphart, ed. Parliamentary versus Presidential Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
• 6. Elgie, Robert, and Sophia Moestrup, eds. Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008.
• 7. Elgie, Robert. “Semi-presidentialism: An Increasingly Common Constitutional Choice”: 1-20. In: Robert Elgie, Sophia Moestrup, and Yu-Shan Wu, eds. Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011.
• 8. Elgie, Robert. “The Politics of Semi-Presidentialism”: 1-21. In: Robert Elgie, ed. Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
• 9. Franko, Tomáš, Eva Nováčková, and Jakub Šedo. “Nominace kandidátů, průběh a výsledky voleb”: 37-51. In: Jakub Šedo, ed. České prezidentské volby v roce 2013. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury, 2013.
• 10. Havlík, Vlastimil, and Vít Hloušek. “Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: The Story of the Populist Public Affairs Party in the Czech Republic.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society Vol. 15, No. 4(2014): 552-570 // DOI: 10.1080/15705854.2014.945254.[Crossref]
• 11. Havlík, Vlastimil. “Česká republika”: 39-90. In: Stanislav Balík and Vlastimil Havlík, eds. Koaliční vládnutí ve střední Evropě (1990-2010). Brno: muni press, 2011.
• 12. Kopeček, Lubomír, and Josef Mlejnek. “Different Confessions, Same Sins? Václav Havel and Václav Klaus as Czech Presidents”: 31-75. In: Vít Hloušek, ed. Presidents above parties? Presidents in Central and Eastern Europe, Their Formal Competencies and Informal Power. Brno: muni press, 2013.
• 13. Kopeček, Lubomír, and Vít Hloušek. “Caretaker Governments in Czech Politics: What to do about a Government Crisis.” Europe-Asia Studies Vol. 66 (2014) [forthcoming] // DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2014.941700.[WoS][Crossref]
• 14. Krašovec, Alenka, and Damjan Lajh. “The Chameleonic Character of the Slovenian Presidents of the Republic”: 143-165. In: Vít Hloušek, ed. Presidents above parties? Presidents in Central and Eastern Europe, Their Formal Competencies and Informal Power. Brno: muni press, 2013.
• 15. Krouwel, André. “Measuring presidentialism of Central and Eastern European Countries.” Working Papers Political Science (Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit) No. 02/2003: 1-22 // http://www.fsw.vu.nl/en/Images/Globalisation,%20Neoliberalism%20and%20the%20Employment%20Question_tcm31-42728.pdf.
• 16. Kysela, Jan, and Zdeněk Kühn. “Presidential Elements in Government: The Czech Republic.” European Constitutional Law Review Vol. 3, No. 1 (2007): 91-113 // DOI: 10.1017/S1574019607000910.[Crossref][WoS]
• 17. Mahoney, James. “Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics.” Comparative Political Studies Vol. 40, No. 2 (2007): 122-144 // DOI: 10.1177/0010414006296345.[Crossref]
• 18. Millard, Frances. “Presidents and Democratization in Poland: The Roles of Lech Wałęsa and Aleksander Kwaśniewski in Building a New Polity.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics Vol. 16, No. 3 (2000): 39-62 // DOI: 10.1080/13523270008415440.[Crossref]
• 19. Musilová, Markéta, and Jakub Šedo. “Diskuse o zavedení přímé volby prezidenta v České republice a její schválení”: 9-35. In: Jakub Šedo, ed. České prezidentské volby v roce 2013. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury, 2013.
• 20. Pasquino, Gianfranco. “Semi-presidentialism: A Political Model at Work.” European Journal of Political Research Vol. 31, No. 1 (1997): 128-137 // DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00309.[Crossref]
• 21. Sartori, Giovanni. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” The American Political Science Review Vol. 64, No. 4 (1970): 1033-1053 // DOI: 10.2307/1958356.[Crossref]
• 22. Sartori, Giovanni, Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. Basingstoke: MacMillan, 1994.
• 23. Sedelius, Thomas, and Sten Berglund. “Towards Presidential Rule in Ukraine: Hybrid regime Dynamics under Semi-Presidentialism.” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics Vol. 5, No. 1 (2012): 20-45 // DOI: 10.2478/v10076-012-0002-2.[Crossref]
• 24. Siaroff, Alan. “Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinction.” European Journal of Political Research Vol. 42, No. 3 (2003): 287-312 // DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00084.[Crossref]
• 25. Tavits, Margit. Presidents with Prime Ministers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/bjlp-2015-0004