The ‘Institutions-Individual’ Conceptual Nexus as a Basis of Alternative Economic Methodologies

• Authors: Zoran Stefanović , Dragan Petrović
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper discusses issues of methodological basis of contemporary economic theory, from the perspective of rival research orientations and their conceptual sensitization to the role and impacts of institutional structures. In this regard, the paper presents methodological individualism, research support of economic orthodoxy, based on a consistent interpretation of all social phenomena as outcomes of individual choice. It is shown that even in its most rigid versions this approach has to take to a certain degree into account the social interactions that go beyond the individualist framework. The opposing research orientation, methodological holism, gives explanatory primacy to (different) social collective entities and structures, characteristics of which are autonomous in nature and essential for the explanation of the individual as an entity of a lower order, whose individual properties are not significant. Both approaches are subjected to reductionist tendencies - whether explanations of the socioeconomic reality are individual or culturally over-determined. Integrating institutions in consideration of socioeconomic reality has repercussions on the mentioned methodological dichotomy, given that in conceptual terms it has the potential to bridge the extremely individualistic or collectivist methodological positions. Awareness of the impact of institutions on the socioeconomic reality has produced distinctive methodological orientations. Institutional individualism considers institutions as exogenous mechanism whose explanation is at the service of shedding light on the behaviour of the individuals as the main actors of social dynamics, and in that sense this approach can be considered as a milder variant of methodological individualism. The institutionalist extension of methodological holism, methodological institutionalism, understands individual acting as a product of an integrated institutional framework, whose dynamics takes place independently of the individuals, according to its own regularities. Some kind of balance between the aforementioned orientations is offered by methodological systemism, which affirms the dual nature of the actors of social dynamics - as both product of units of a lower order, but also as entities with autonomous, emergent properties. The contextualisation of relations between institutions and individuals in accordance with a system perspective may be a suitable way, with more tuned reality, theoretical valuation and overcoming differences between opponent methodological traditions.

Keywords

EN

methodological orientation; individuals; institutions; system; B31; B4; B52

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Economic Themes
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 54
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 1-20

Dates

published

2016-03-01

received

2015-09-08

accepted

2016-03-23

online

2016-06-08

Contributors

author

Zoran Stefanović

• University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Serbia, Associate Professor

author

Dragan Petrović

• University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Serbia

References

• Agassi, J. (1960). Methodological individualism. British Journal of Sociology, 11(3), 244-70.[Crossref]
• Agassi, J. (1975). Institutional individualism. British Journal of Sociology, 26(2), 144-156.[Crossref]
• Arrow, K. (1994). Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge., American Economic Review, 84(2), 1-9.
• Blaug, M. (1985). Economic Theory in Retrospect, (4th ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Blaug, M. (1992). The Methodology of Economics or How Economists Explain, (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Blaug, M. (1999). Individualism and the Unity of Science. Esays on Reduction, Explanation and the Special Science, By Harold Kincaid, 1997. (pp. 249-251)., Oxford: Rowman &Littlefield Publisher
• Block, W. (1980). On Robert Nozick's 'On Austrian Methodology'. Inquiry, 23(4), 397-444.[Crossref]
• Boland, L. (1982). The Foundations of Economic Method, London: Allen&Unwin.
• Bunge, M. (1996). Finding Philosophy in Social Science. Yale University Press.
• Bunge, M. (2000). Systemism: the alternative to individualism and holism. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 29(2), 147-157.
• Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Davis, J. (2003). The Theory of the Individual in Economics: Identity and Value. London and New York: Routledge.
• Demeulenaere, P. (2000) Individualism and Holism: New Controwersies in the Philosophy of Social Science. Mind & Society, 2(1), 3-16.
• Elster, J. (1985). Making Sense of Marx, Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Field, A. J. (1979). On the explanation of rules using rational choice models. Journal of Economic Issues, 13(1), 49-72.[Crossref]
• Fine G. (2001). Enacting Norms: Mushrooming and the Culture of Expectations and Explanations. In: Hechter, M. & Opp, K. (eds.), Social Norms, Russell Sage Foundation.
• Gilpin, R (2001). Global Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Golubović, N. (2011). Društvena ekonomika – Ekonomska aktivnost u društvenom okruženju. Niš: Ekonomski fakultet, Univerzitet u Nišu.
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddednes. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.[Crossref]
• Hodgson, G. (1988). Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for Modern Institutional Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hodgson, G (1995). The Evolution of Evolutionary Economics. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 42(6):469-488. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.1995.tb01172.x[Crossref]
• Hodgson, G. (1998). Aproach of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 166-192.
• Hodgson, G. (1999) Economics and Utopia: Why the Learning of Economy is not the End of History. New York: Routledge
• Hodgson, G. (2007). Meanings of Methodological Individualism. Journal of Economic Methodology, 14(2), 211-226.
• Hodgson, G.,W. Samuels, J. &. Tool M. R (Eds.) (1994) The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, L-Z. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
• Jarvie, I. C. (1972). Concepts and Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Kapeller, J. (2016). Beyond Foundations: Systemism in Economic Thinking, In: Jo, T-H. & Todorova, Z. (Eds.) Advancing the Frontiers in Heterodox Economics: Essays in Honor of Frederic S. Lee, (pp. 115-134). London and New York: Routledge.
• Keizer, P. (2007). The Concept of Institution in Economics and Sociology, a Methodological Exposition. Discussion Paper Series nr: 07-25, Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute, Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University.
• Kincaid, H. (1990). Eliminativism and Methodological Individualism. Philosophy of Science, 57(1), 141-148.[Crossref]
• Kincaid, H. (1998). Methodological Individualism/Atomism. in Davis, J., Hands, D. W. & Mäki, U. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Methodology, Cheltenham, U. K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 294-300.
• Kitanović, D. & Petrović, D. (2010) Ogledi o metodološkim problemima savremene ekonomske nauke. Niš: Ekonomski fakultet, Univerzitet u Nišu.
• Kontopoulos, K. M. (1993). The Logics of Social Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Langlois, R. (1989). The New Institutional Economics: an Introductionary Essay. in Langlois, R. (Ed.). Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics, (pp. 1-25.) New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Lawson, A. (1997). Economics and Reality, London: Routledge.
• Mises von, L. (1949)1996. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, (4th revised ed.). San Francisko: Fox and Wilkes.
• North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Nozick, R. (1977). On Austrian Methodology. Synthese, 36(3), 353-392.[Crossref]
• Parto, S. (2005). Economic Activity and Institutions: Taking Stock. Journal of Economic Issues. 39(1), 21-52.[Crossref]
• Petrović, D. (2008). Methodological individualism - criticizing and superseding possibilities. Facta Universitatis: Series economics and organization, 5(3), 185-194.
• Petrović, D. (2012). Epistemološke i ontološke pretpostavke metodološkog individualizma. Ekonomske ideje i praksa, 7: 91-100.
• Petrović, D. & Stefanović, Z. (2013). Economic Science in the Light of the Economical Theoretical Imperialism Development, In: Marinković, S. & Rochhia, S. (Eds.), Rethinking Europe after the Economic Crisis, Lessons for the European Core and Periphery, (pp. 247-265). Niš: Faculty of Economics, University of Niš,
• Polanyi, K. (1957). The Economy as Instituted Process. in Polanyi, K. et.al. (eds.), Trade and Market in the Early Empires. (pp. 243-270). New York: Free Prees
• Popper, R. K. (1945)1960. The Open Society and Its Enemies, Volume 1: The Spel of Plato, Vols. 2., Hegel and Marx, London: Routledge Kegan& Paul.
• Popper, R. K. (1957)1961. Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Rodrik, D. (2005). Growth Strategies, in: Aghion, P, & Durlauf, S (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth Vol. 1A, North Holland.
• Rutherford, M. (1994). Institutions in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Stefanović, Z. (2009). Institucionalistički pravac ekonomske misli, Beograd: Zadužbina Andrejević.
• Toboso, F. (2001). Institutional Individualism and Institutional Change: The Search for a Middle Way Mode of Explanation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25(6): 765-783. doi: 10.1093/cje/25.6.765[Crossref]
• Udehn, L. (2002). The Changing Face of Methodological Individualism. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 479-507. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140938[Crossref]
• Watkins, J. (1953). The Principe of Methodological Individualism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,3(10): 186-89.
• Wilber, C. K. & R. S. Harrison (1978). The Methodological Basis of Institutional Economics: Pattern Model, Storytelling, and Holism. Journal of Economic Issues, 12(1): 61-89.[Crossref]
• Williamson, O. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595-613.[Crossref]
• Zwirn, G. (2007). Methodological Individualism or Methodological Atomism: The Case of Friedrich Hayek. History of Political Economy, 39(1), 48-80. doi:10.1215/00182702-2006-005[Crossref]
• Балацкий, Е. В. (2012). За пределами економического империализма: Преоделение сложниости. Общественные науки и соврееменность, 4, 138-149.
• Кирдина, С. (2013). Методологическийиндивидуализм и методологический институционализм. Вопросы экономики, 10, 66-88.
• Полтерович В. М. (2011). Становление общего социального анализа/Общественные науки и современность, 2, 101-111.
• Фролов Д. П. (2008). Методолгическийинститутионализм: новый взгляд на эволюциюэкономической наук. Вопросы экономики, 11, 90-101.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/ethemes-2016-0001