Pushing Or Pulling Of The Business By Family Members: A Study Of Family Businesses In Sri Lanka

• Authors: Ravindra H. Kuruppuge , Aleš Gregar
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

A number of family business researches affirm benefits of family involvement to the business while some of other studies assure only detriments of family involvement. When comparative studies of family businesses begin to surface on the family involvement in business, there is that irritating question on what effect is brought about by family involvement to the business. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore business advantages and disadvantages generated by family involvement in businesses in Sri Lanka. The present study attempted to address the above knowledge gap, using qualitative research approach and multiple case studies as the strategy of inquiry. Purposive sampling technique was used to select both cases and respondents. Privately held, successfully conducted four family businesses were selected as cases and, existing business owner and one family related manager from each case were taken as respondents. Data was collected mainly via semi-structured, in depth interviews, observations, and secondary documents. Data collection from interviews consisted of 15 interviews with 09 different people from four cases. Before the data analysis, coding and categorization of respondents’ views from interviews helped to identify common patterns and themes from both within the case and across cases. The analysis was carried out in the light of Agency Theory and resulted in a rich understanding of business advantages and disadvantages of family involvement in businesses in Sri Lanka. The findings of this study indicated that the agency cost is created not only on business matters but also on family matters. Further, findings revealed that agency benefit also can be obtained by family business by handling the family matters carefully in line with business matters. Findings of this study clearly indicated that an extension to Agency Theory is required to explain owner agent relationship in family businesses.

Keywords

EN

family business; family involvement; advantages (merit); disadvantages (demerit); agency theory and Sri Lanka

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Foundations of Management
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 121-128

Dates

published

2015-06-01

online

2016-01-06

Contributors

author

Ravindra H. Kuruppuge

• Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Faculty of Management and Economics, Czech Republic

author

Aleš Gregar

• Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Faculty of Management and Economics, Czech Republic

References

• [1] Morck R., Yeung B. - Family control and rent seeking society. Unpublished paper presented at the 2002, Theories of the Family Enterprise Conference, Wharton Business School, Philadelphia, PA. 2002.
• [2] Narva R.L. - Heritage and tradition in family business: How family-controlled enterprises connect the experience of their past to the promise of their future [in] G.K. McCann, N. Upton (eds.) - Destroying myths and creating vale in family business (pp. 29–38). Deland, FL: Stetson University, 2001.
• [3] Chua J.H., Lloyd P., Steier L.P., Chrisman J.J. - How family firms solve intra-family agency problems using interlocking directorates: an extension, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 777-783, 2006.[Crossref]
• [4] Dharmadasa P. - Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Further Evidence from Sri Lanka and Japan, International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 5(4), 34-47, 2014.
• [5] Habbershon T.G., Mary L.W., Ian MacMillan. C. - A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451-465, 2003.[Crossref]
• [6] Khana T., Yafeh Y., Business groups in emerging markets: paragons or parasites? Journal of Economic Literature, 45, 331–372, 2007.[Crossref]
• [7] Ranasinghe S. - Managing in a Developing Context: Sri Lankan perspectives, E-Team Designs, Hokandara, Sri Lanka, 2011.
• [8] Nanayakkara G. - Managing in Sri Lanka: Problems and Prospects, Volume II, Public Administration and National Development, Academy of Management Sciences, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2004.
• [9] Jayawardena K. - No bodies to some bodies: Rice of the colonial Bourgeoisie in Sri Lanka, Social Scientists' Association - Sri Lanka, Colombo, 2000.
• [10] Nanayakkara G. - Culture and management in Sri Lanka, Postgraduate Institute of Management, University of Sri Jayawardenepura, Sri Lanka, 1992.
• [11] Miller D., Sardais C. - Angel Agents: Agency Theory Reconsidered, Academy of Management Perspectives, 6-13, 2011.
• [12] Fama E., Jensen M. - Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325, 1983.
• [13] Eisenhardt K.M. - Building theories from case study research. Academy Management Review. 14, 532-550, 1989.
• [14] Grabke-Rundell A., Gomez-Mejia L.R. - Power as a Determinant of Executive Compensation, Human Resource Management Review, 12, 3-23, 2002.[Crossref]
• [15] Bainbridge S.M. - Executive Compensation: Who Decides?, Texas Law Review, 83, 1616-1662, 2005.
• [16] Guba E.G., Lincoln Y.S. - Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 1994.
• [17] Miller D., Isabelle L.B. - Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2005.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/fman-2015-0030