Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2015 | 25 | 3 | 302-316

Article title

No Prejudice-Free Society Means no Prejudice-Free Teachers, but Better Times Are Coming: Teachers and Cultural Diversity

Authors

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Multicultural education tends to be automatically associated with pupils but in practice it places demands on all those involved in the teaching process. Of these the most predominant role is allocated to the teacher who mediates multicultural competence. Pupil attitudes towards foreigners and cultural diversity are not only influenced by multicultural education but also by teachers’ beliefs-and teachers’ beliefs are largely influenced by personal opinions and attitudes. The author presents the results of qualitative analysis performed on the unrestricted responses of 86 Czech teacher trainees and teachers on the topic of their experiences of foreigners. The analysis indicates their personal attitudes to foreigners, foreign cultures and diversity generally, the level of reflection in relation to cultural diversity, and discusses the results in relation to the wider sociocultural context.

Publisher

Journal

Year

Volume

25

Issue

3

Pages

302-316

Physical description

Dates

published
2015-07-01
online
2015-07-01

Contributors

author
  • Department of School Education, Faculty of Humanities, Tomas Bata University in Zlín nám. T. G. Masaryka 1279 760 01 Zlín Czech Republic

References

  • Dluhošová, H. (2008). Integrace cizinců v České republice. In T. Šišková, Výchova k toleranci a proti rasismu. Sborník. Praha: Portál.
  • Fives, H., & Gill, M. (2015). International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp.436-452).New York: Routledge.
  • Gavora, P. (2006). Sprievodca metodologiou kvalitativneho vyskumu. Bratislava: Regent.
  • Gay, G. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs about cultural diversity. Problems & possibilities. In H. Fives & M. Gill, International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp.436-452). New York: Routledge.
  • Graf, S., Hřebíčková, M., Petrjánošová, M., & Leix, A. (in press). Meziskupinové postoje a meziskupinový kontakt v pěti středoevropských zemích. Praha: Academia.
  • Havlík, R. (2007). Česká xenofobie. In N. Pelcová a kol., Multikulturní výchova ve vzdělávání budoucích učitelů a dalším vzdělávání učitelů (pp. 158-170). Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze.
  • Hayes, N. (1996). Principles of social psychology. Hove: Psychology Press. Hladík, J. Multikulturní kompetence studentů pomáhajících profesí. Zlín: Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně.
  • Holý, L. (1996). The little Czech and the great Czech nation: National identity and the post-communist transformation of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Klvačová, P., & Bitrich, T. (2003). How foreigners are (not) written about. In Nečitelní cizinci. Jak se (ne) píše o cizincích v českém tisku (pp. 54-73). Praha: Multikulturní centrum Praha.
  • Kostková, K. (2012). Rozvoj interkulturní komunikační kompetence. Brno: MuniPress.
  • Leix, A. (2012). Green glasses. Some less popular aspects of international research cooperation in social science and humanities. In A. Wiegerová (Ed.), Young researchers forum (pp. 111-117).Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladatelství.
  • Leix, A. (2013a). “I was expecting her to be a fanatic catholic, but she was not”. How international exchange programmes reduce prejudice. The New Educational Review, 31, 205-216.
  • Leix, A. (2013b). „Pepiki“ i „Pšonci“: co u siebie wzajemnie lubią, co ich zaskakuje, czego nie lubią, a co wywołuje ich uśmiech? In M. Dębicki & J. Makaro (Eds.), Sąsiedztwa III RP - Czechy.Zagadnienia społeczne (pp. 117-141). Wrocław: Gajt.
  • Macrae, C. N, Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2014) Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. In K. Kawakami (Ed.), The psychology of prejudice (pp. 175-200). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oax, CA: Sage.
  • Pelcová, N. a kol. (2007). Multikulturní výchova ve vzdělávání budoucích učitelů a dalším vzdělávání učitelů. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze - Pedagogická fakulta.
  • Peräkylä, A. (2005). Analysing talk and text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 869-886). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Petrjánošová, M., & Leix, A. (2013). Languages of border lands, borders of languages: native and foreign language use in intergroup contact between Czechs and their neighbours. Human Affairs: Postdisciplinary Humanities and Social Sciences Quarterly, 23(4), 658-679.
  • Průcha, J. (2011). Multikuturní výchova. Příručká nejen pro učitele. Trinton: Praha/Kroměřiž.
  • Richards, T. J., & Richards, L. (1998). Using computers in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative research (pp. 445-462). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Šišková, T. (2008). Výchova k toleranci a proti rasismu. (2nd ed. Updated). Praha: Portál.
  • Ullucci, K. (2007). The myths that blind: The role of beliefs in school change. Journal of Educational Controversy, 2(1). Retrieved May 25, 2015, from http://cedar.wwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=jec
  • Zerzová, J. (2012). Interkulturní komunikační kompetence a její rozvíjení v hodinách anglického jazyka na 2. stupni ZŠ. Brno: MuniPress.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_1515_humaff-2015-0025
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.