No Measure without Concept. A Critical Review on the Conceptualization and Measurement of Environmental Concern

• Authors: André Schaffrin
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Environmental concern is a highly relevant concept in the context of environmental change and increasing demand for political regulation of environmental protection. In order to prevent climate change, loss in global biodiversity or other highly critical environmental issues, we need to understand why (and why not) citizens support environmental politics. However, there is no measure without a concept, and empirical results might be biased if they are not operationalized according to well defined (theoretical and methodological) criteria. This research endeavor focuses on historical and more recent developments of the concept of individual environmental concern. It will be demonstrated that environmental concern is not only a distinct concept excluding behavior and knowledge, but is also rather complex addressing geographical as well as temporal issues. Most recent developments suggesting a hierarchical multi-dimensional character will be discussed and examples of the most relevant empirical measures and scales will be evaluated.

Keywords

EN

environmental concern; climate change; measurement construction

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: International Review of Social Research
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 11-31

Dates

published

2011-10-01

online

2015-05-06

Contributors

author

André Schaffrin

• University of Cologne

References

• Best, H. (2009) ‘Eating comes first and then morality? A field experiment on the low-cost hypothesis and the model of frame selection’. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 38 (2): 131-151.
• Bladh, M. and H. Krantz (2008) ‘Towards a bright future? Household use of electric light: A microlevel study’. Energy Policy, 36 (9): 3521-3530.[Crossref]
• Bord, R. J., R. E. O’Connor and A. Fisher (2000) ‘In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?’. Public Understanding of Science, 9 (3): 205-218.[Crossref]
• Burstein, P. (2003) ‘The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda’. Political Research Quarterly, 56 (1): 29-40.[Crossref]
• Carman, C. J. (1998) ‘Dimensions of environmental policy support in the United States’. Social Science Quarterly, 79 (4): 717-733.
• de Groot, J. I. M. and L. Steg (2007) ‘Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations’. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38 (3): 318-332.
• Diekmann, A. (1996) ‘Homo ÖKOnomicus - Anwendungen und Probleme der Theorie rationalen Handelns im Umweltbereich’ In Diekmann, A. and C. C. Jaeger (eds.) Umweltsoziologie, 89-118. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
• Diekmann, A. and P. Preisendörfer (1992) ‘Ecology in everyday life. Inconsistencies between environmental attitudes and behavior’. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 44 (2): 226-251.
• Diekmann, A. and P. Preisendörfer (1998) ‘Environmental consciousness and environmental behavior in low-cost and in high-cost situations. An empirical examination of the low-cost hypothesis’. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 27 (6): 438-451.
• Dietz, T., A. Dan and R. Shwom (2007) ‘Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences’. Rural Sociological Society, 72 (2): 185-214.[Crossref]
• Dietz, T., P. C. Stern and G. A. Guagnano (1998) ‘Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern’. Environment and Behavior, 30 (4): 450-471.[Crossref]
• Dunlap, R. E. and K. D. Van Liere (1978) ‘“The New Environmental Paradigm”: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results’. Journal of Environmental Education, 9 (1): 10-19.[Crossref]
• Dunlap, R. E., G. H. Gallup and A. M. Gallup (1993) ‘Of global concern: Results of the Health of the Planet Surevey’. Environment, 35 (9): 7-15, 33-39.[Crossref]
• Dunlap, R. E. and R. E. Jones (2002) ‘Environmental Concern: Conceptual and Measurement Issues’ In Dunlap, R. E. and W. Michelson (eds.) Handbook of Environmental Sociology, 482-524. Westport, London: Greenwood Press.
• Dunlap, R. E. and R. York (2008) ‘The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: Evidence from four multinational surveys’. Sociological Quarterly, 49 (3): 529-563.[Crossref]
• Dunlap, R. E., K. D. Van Liere, A. G. Mertig and R. E. Jones (2000) ‘Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale’. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3): 425-442.[Crossref]
• Ester, P. (1981) ‘Environmental Concern in the Netherlands’ In O’Riordan, T. and K. R. Turner (eds.) Progress in Resource Management and Environmental Planning, 81-108. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
• Fransson, N. and T. Garling (1999) ‘Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4): 369-382.[Crossref]
• Franzen, A. (1995) ‘Trittbrettfahren oder Engagement? Überlegungen zum Zusammenhang zwischen Umweltbewusstsein und Umweltverhalten’ In Diekmann, A. and A. Franzen (eds.) Kooperatives Umweltverhalten. Modelle, Erfahrungen, Massnahmen, 133-149. Chur/Zürich: Rüegger AG.
• Franzen, A. and R. Meyer (2004) ‘Climate change in environmental attitudes? An analysis of the ISSP 2000’. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 33 (2): 119-137.
• Gelissen, J. (2007) ‘Explaining popular support for environmental protection: A multilevel analysis of 50 Nations’. Environment and Behavior, 39 (3): 392-415.[Crossref]
• Hamilton, L. C., C. R. Colocousis and C. M. Duncan (2010) ‘Place effects on environmental views’. Rural Sociology, 75 (2): 326-347.[Crossref]
• Hawcroft, L. J. and T. L. Milfont (2010) ‘The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30 (2): 143-158.[Crossref]
• Heberlein, T. A. (1981) ‘Environmental attitudes’. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik, 2: 241-270.
• Hirsh, J. B. (2010) ‘Personality and environmental concern’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30 (2): 245-248.[Crossref]
• Ignatow, G. (2006) ‘Cultural models of nature and society: Reconsidering environmental attitudes and concern’. Environment and Behavior, 38 (4): 441-461.[Crossref]
• Inglehart, R. (1995) ‘Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies’. Political Science and Politics, 28(1): 57-72.[Crossref]
• Kaiser, F. G. and H. Scheuthle (2003) ‘Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism’. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(5): 1033-1048.[Crossref]
• Keirstead, J. (2007) ‘Behavioural responses to photovoltaic systems in the UK domestic sector’. Energy Policy, 35 (8): 4128-4141.[Crossref]
• Klineberg, S. L., M. McKeever and B. Rothenbach (1998) ‘Demographic predictors of environmental concern: It does make a difference how it’s measured’. Social Science Quarterly, 79 (4): 734-753.
• Kühnel, S. and S. Bamberg (1998) ‘Ist die Low-Cost Hypothese noch zu retten? Erwiderung auf Diekmann und Preisendörfer’. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 27 (4): 273-275.
• Maloney, M. P. and M. P. Ward (1973) ‘Ecology: Let’s hear from the people. An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge’. American Psychologist, 28(7): 583-586.[Crossref]
• Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2007) ‘Concern for the environment among general publics: A cross-national study’. Society & Natural Resources, 20(10): 883-898.[Crossref]
• Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2008) ‘Are there similar sources of environmental concern? Comparing industrialized countries’. Social Science Quarterly, 89 (5): 1312-1335.[Crossref]
• Milfont, T. L. and V. V. Gouveia (2006) ‘Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26 (1): 72-82.[Crossref]
• Milfont, T. L. and J. Duckitt (2010) ‘The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30 (1): 80-94.[Crossref]
• Milfont, T. L., C. G. Sibley and J. Duckitt (2010) ‘Testing the moderating role of the components of norm activation on the relationship between values and environmental behavior’. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(1): 124-131.
• Quandt, M. and D. Ohr (2004) ‘How to decide about nothing? Low cost situations in the rational choice modelling of norm-oriented behaviour’. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 56(4): 683-707.
• Rannikko, P. (1994) ‘Local environmental conflicts and the change in environmental consciousness’. Paper read at Workshop on Sociological Perspectives on Environmental Problems in Modern Society. Orebro, Sweden.
• Schahn, J. and E. Holzer (1990) ‘Studies of Individual Environmental Concern - The Role Knowledge, Gender, and Background Variables’. Environment and Behavior, 22 (6): 767-786.[Crossref]
• Schultz, P. W. (2001) ‘The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21 (4): 327-339.[Crossref]
• Schultz, P. W. and L. Zelezny (1999) ‘Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19 (3): 255-265.
• Shwom, R., A. Dan and T. Dietz (2008) ‘The effects of information and state of residence on climate change policy preferences’. Climatic Change, 90 (4): 343-358.[Crossref]
• Skogen, K. (1999) ‘Another look at culture and nature: How culture patterns influence environmental orientation among Nowegian youth’. Acta Sociologica, 42 (3): 223-239.[Crossref]
• Soyez, K., S. Hoffmann, S. Wunschmann and K. Gelbrich (2009) ‘Proenvironmental value orientation across cultures. Development of a German and Russian scale’. Social Psychology, 40 (4): 222-233.[Crossref]
• Stern, P. C. (2000) ‘Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior’. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3): 407-424.[Crossref]
• Stern, P. C. and T. Dietz (1994) ‘The value basis of environmental concern’. Journal of Social Issues, 50 (3): 65-84.[Crossref]
• Takács-Sánta, A. (2007) ‘Barriers to environmental concern’. Human Ecology Review, 14 (1): 26-38.
• Tognacci, L. N., R. H. Weigel, M. F. Wideen and D. T. A. Vernon (1972) ‘Environmental quality: How universal is public concern’. Environment and Behavior, 4 (1): 73-86.[Crossref]
• Urban, D. (1986) ‘What is ecological awareness? An exploratory analysis of a multidimensional attitude-construct’. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 15 (5): 363-377.
• Uzzell, D. (2000) ‘The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20 (4): 307-318.[Crossref]
• van Liere, K. D. and R. E. Dunlap (1980) ‘The social bases of environmental concern. A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence’. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44 (2): 181-197.[Crossref]
• Weigel, R. H. and J. Weigel (1978) ‘Environmental concern: The development of a measure’. Environment and Behavior, 10(1): 3-15.[Crossref]
• Wiseman, M. and F. X. Bogner (2003) ‘A higher-order model of ecological values and its relationship to personality’. Personality and Individual Differences, 34 (5): 783-794.[Crossref]
• Wynnveen, C. J., G. T. Kyle and S. G. Sutton (2010). ‘Environmental World View, Place Attachment, and Attitudes toward Environmental Impacts’. XVII World Congress of Sociology. Gothenburg, Sweden.
• Xiao, C. Y. and R. E. Dunlap (2007) ‘Validating a comprehensive model of environmental concern cross-nationally: A US-Canadian comparison’. Social Science Quarterly, 88 (2): 471-493.[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/irsr-2011-0018