Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2011 | 1 | 3 | 133-154

Article title

Knowledge on Climate Change and Energy Saving Renovations by Apartment Owners in Bulgaria and Latvia. A Qualitative Study

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Do apartment owners in Bulgaria and Latvia carry out energy-saving practices in their homes, and what are the justifications thereof? Do they relate these practices to climate change or to their environmental knowledge? These are the main questions investigated in this research. Data are drawn from a qualitative survey of dwellers’ renovation activities and the motivations thereof. Results indicate that the poor conditions of multi-apartment buildings and the feeling of being cold or uncomfortable are sufficient levers driving energy-related renovations in privately-owned apartments. Environmental concern is never expressed as a lever for undertaking renovation, either in Bulgaria or in Latvia and there exist some scepticism and misunderstanding concerning climate change.

Publisher

Year

Volume

1

Issue

3

Pages

133-154

Physical description

Dates

published
2011-10-01
online
2015-05-06

Contributors

  • Université Catholique de Louvain Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Université Catholique de Louvain
  • Black Sea Regional Energy Centre
  • Black Sea Regional Energy Centre
  • Ekodoma
author
  • Ekodoma

References

  • Abrahamse, W. and L. Steg (2009) ‘How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings?’ Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 (5): 711-720.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Abrahamse, W., L. Steg, C. Vlek and T. Rothengatter. (2005) ‘A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25 (3): 273-291.[Crossref]
  • Abrahamse, W., L. Steg, C. Vlek and T. Rothengatter (2007) ‘The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioural antecedents’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27 (4): 265-276.[Crossref]
  • Ajzen, I. (1991) ‘The theory of planned behaviour’. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179-211.
  • Bamberg, S. (2003) ‘How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23 (1): 21-32.[Crossref]
  • Bartiaux, F. (2007) ‘Greening Some Consumption Behaviours: Do New Routines Require Agency and Reflexivity?’ In Zaccaï, E. (ed.) Sustainable Consumption, Ecology and Fair Trade, pp. 91-108. London: Routledge.
  • Bartiaux, F. (2008) ‘Does environmental information overcome practice compartmentalisation and change consumers’ behaviours?’. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (11): 1170-1180.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Bartiaux, F. (2011) ‘Synthesis and Comparison of Findings from Home Owners in Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Latvia and Portugal’. In F. Bartiaux (ed.) A Qualitative Study on Home Energy-related Renovation in Five European Countries: Homeowners’ Practices and Opinions, pp. 8-50 ( - consulted on 14 March 2011)
  • Bartiaux, F. and K. Gram-Hanssen (2005) ‘Socio-political Factors Influencing Household Electricity Consumption: A comparison between Denmark and Belgium’. In ECEEE (ed.) What Works & Who Delivers, pp. 1313-1326. ( - consulted on 22 August 2011)
  • Bartiaux, F., K. Gram-Hanssen, P. Fonseca, L. Ozoliņa and T. H. Christensen (2011) ‘A Practice-theory Based Analysis of Energy Renovations in Four European Countries’. In ECEEE (ed.) Energy Efficiency First: The Foundation of a Low-Carbon Society, pp. 67-78. ( - consulted on 22 August 2011)
  • Bartiaux, F., G. Vekemans, K. Gram-Hanssen, D. Maes, M. Cantaert, B. Spies and J. Desmedt (2006) Socio-Technical Factors Influencing Residential Energy Consumption. Brussels: Belgian Science Policy Office. ( - consulted on 22 August 2011)
  • Beck, U. (2010) ‘Climate for Change, or How to Create a Green Modernity?’ Theory, Culture & Society, 27 (2-3): 254-266.[WoS]
  • Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (2009) Housing. ( – consulted on 18 August 2011).
  • Connolly, J. and A. Prothero (2008) ‘Green consumption: Life-politics, risk and contradictions’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8 (1): 117-145.
  • DeCanio, S. (1998) ‘The efficiency paradox: bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energy-saving technologies’. Energy Policy, 26 (5): 441-454.[Crossref]
  • Gosselain, V. and F. Bartiaux (2010) ‘Methodology for In-depth Interviews Investigating EU Dwelling Owners’ Practices on (Energy-related) Renovation Works’. In F. Bartiaux (ed.) A Qualitative Study on Home Energy-related Renovation in Five European Countries: Homeowners’ Practices and Opinions, Appendix B. ( - consulted on 14 March 2011)
  • Gram-Hanssen, K. (2010) ‘Residential heat comfort practices: Understanding users’. Building Research and Information, 38 (2): 175-186.
  • Gram-Hanssen, K. (2011) ‘Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1): 61-78.
  • Gram-Hanssen, K., F. Bartiaux, O. M. Jensen and M. Cantaert (2007) ‘Do homeowners use energy labels? A comparison between Denmark and Belgium’. Energy Policy, 35 (5): 2879-2888.[Crossref][WoS]
  • Hackett, B. and L. Lutzenhiser (1991) ‘Social structures and economic conduct: Interpreting variations in household energy consumption’. Sociological Forum, 6 (3): 449-470.[Crossref]
  • Halkier, B. (2001) ‘Routinisation or Reflexivity? Consumers and Normative Claims for Environmental Consideration’. In Gronow, J. and A. Warde (eds.) Ordinary Consumption, pp. 25-44. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Halkier, B., T. Katz-Gerro and L. Martens (2011) ‘Applying practice theory to the study of consumption: Theoretical and methodological considerations’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1): 3-13.
  • Hamilton, C. (2010) Requiem for A Species. Why We Resist the Truth about Climate Change. London and Washington: Earthscan.
  • Hargreaves, T. (2011) ‘Practiceing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1): 79-99.
  • Hird, M. (2010) ‘Indifferent globality: Gaia, symbiosis and “other worldliness”’. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2-3): 54-72.[WoS]
  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.
  • Keller, M. (2005) ‘Needs, desires and the experience of scarcity’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5 (1): 65-85.
  • Maréchal K (2009) ‘The Crucial Role of Habits in Energy Consumption: An Evolutionary Approach on Changing Current Patterns’. In ECEEE (ed.) Act! Innovate! Deliver! pp. 1693-1703. ( - consulted on 22 August 2011)
  • Martuccelli D. (2002) Grammaire de l’individu. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Milfont, T. L. and J. Duckitt. (2004) ‘The structure of environmental attitudes: A first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (3): 289-303.[Crossref]
  • Montaigne, Eyquem de M. (1595) Essais. Paris: Folio classiques.
  • National Statistical Institute (2010) Housing Fund 2009. ( - consulted on 12 November 2010).
  • Nikolaev, A. (2009) ‘Appendix I. Barriers Reported by the Member States – 2.2 Bulgaria’. In Tuominen, P. and K. Klobut (eds.) Country Specific Factors – Report of findings in WP3. ( – consulted on 20 November 2010)
  • Nistor, L. (2007) From the paradox of property to the paradox of satisfaction. State and perception of the Romanian housing conditions. Paper presented at the ENHR International Conference, Rotterdam, 25-28 June 2007.
  • Ozoliņa, L. and M. Rošā (2009) “Appendix I. Barriers Reported by the Member States – 2.7 Latvia”. In Tuominen, P. and K. Klobut (eds.) Country Specific Factors – Report of Findings in WP3. ( – consulted on 22 August 2011)
  • Reckwitz, A. (2002) ‘Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing’. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2): 243-63.
  • Sardianou, E. (2007) ‘Estimating energy conservation patterns of Greek households’. Energy Policy, 35: 3778-3791.[Crossref][WoS]
  • Schatzki, T. (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schultz, P. W. (2001) ‘The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21 (4): 327-339.[Crossref]
  • Shove, E. (2010) ‘Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change’. Environment and Planning A, 42 (6): 1273-1285.
  • Szerszynski, B. (2010) ‘Reading and writing the weather: Climate technics and the moment of responsibility’. Theory, Culture & Society, 27 (2-3): 9-30.[WoS]
  • Szerszynski, B. and J. Urry (2010) ‘Changing climates: Introduction’. Theory, Culture & Society, 27 (2-3): 1-8.[WoS]
  • UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development) (1992) Agenda 21. New York, NY: United Nations.
  • Urry, J. (2010) ‘Consuming the planet to excess’. Theory, Culture & Society, 27 (2-3): 191-212.[WoS]
  • Warde, A. (2005) ‘Consumption and theories of practice’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5 (2): 131-151.
  • Watson, M. and E. Shove (2008) ‘Product, competence, project and practice. DIY and the dynamics of craft consumption’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8 (1): 69-89.
  • Wilhite, H., H. Nagakami, T. Masuda, Y. Yamaga and H. Haneda (1996) ‘A cross-cultural analysis of household energy use behaviour in Japan and Norway’. Energy Policy, 24 (9): 795-803.[Crossref]
  • Yusoff, K. (2010) ‘Biopolitical economies and the political aesthetics of climate change’. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2-3): 73-99.[WoS]

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_1515_irsr-2011-0024
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.