Rethinking Native Anthropology: Migration and Auto-Ethnography in the Post-Accession Europe

• Authors: Marta Kempny
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper embarks on the epistemological debate on native anthropology and examines the complexities inherent in the process of production of ethnographic knowledge in the post-accession Europe. The author first addresses the questions of reflexivity in anthropology. In relation to this, the paper discusses the interdisciplinary theoretical perspectives on researcher’s positionality in the field of the study and situatedness of knowledge claims. Subsequently, the author demonstrates how their own status as a native anthropologist was played out in their ethnographic fieldwork among Polish migrants in Belfast. To this end, the author examines their positionality in the field, pointing to intricacies of the insider/outsider status. Next, the paper focuses on the dialectics at work in carrying out an ethnographic study among the members of the same ethnic group, but away from home. It indicates potential disadvantages and advantages deriving from such a situation.

Keywords

EN

native anthropology; reflexivity; positionality; situated knowledge

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: International Review of Social Research
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 2
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 39-52

Dates

published

2012-06-01

online

2015-05-06

Contributors

author

Marta Kempny

• Queen’s University Belfast

References

• Abu-Lughod, L. (1993) Writing Women’s Worlds: Bedouin Stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Abu-Lughod, L. (2000) Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Anae, M. (2010). ‘Teu Le VA Toward a native anthropology’ in Special Issue – Genealogies: Articulating indigenous anthropology in/of Oceania. Pacific Studies, 33 (2/3): 222-241.
• Anzaldua, G. (1987) Borderlands, La Frontera. San Francisco: Spinsters.
• Clifford, J. (1986). Introduction: Partial truths. Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography, Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (eds). Berkeley, USA: University of California Press.
• Denzin, N and Y. Lincoln (2000) Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
• Hertz, R. (Ed.) (1997) Reflexivity and Voice. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
• Fleisher, M. (1995) Thieves and Beggars. Lives of Urban Street Criminals. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
• Hartsock, N. (1999). The Feminist Standpoint Revisited. Bouler, CO: Westview Press.
• Hill-Collins, P. (1997). How Much Difference Is Too Much? Black Feminist Thought and the Politics of Postmodern Social Theory. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 17: 3-37.
• Ka’ili, T. (2005). Tauhi va: Nurturing Tongan sociospatial ties in Maui and beyond. The Contemporary Pacific, 17 (1): 83-114.
• Kanaaneh, M. (1997). Indigenous Anthropology: theory and praxis. Dialectical Anthropology 22(1): 1-21.[Crossref]
• Kondo, D.K. (1986) Dissolution and Reconstitution of the Self: Implications for Anthropological Epistemology. Cultural Anthropology, 1: 74-96.
• Kondo, D.K. (1990) Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Krizek, R. (2003). Ethnography as the Excavation of Personal Narrative. In R.P. Clair (ed.) Expressions of Ethnography: Novel Approaches to Qualitative Methods, pp. 141-152. Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Marcus, G.E. (1998) Ethnography through Thick and Thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Marcus, G. and M. Fischer. (1986) Anthropology as Cultural Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Melosik, Z. (2002). Kryzys meskosci w kulturze wspoleczesnej [Masculinity crisis in contemporary culture]. Poznan: Wolumin.
• Merton, R. (1972) Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 7: 9-47.[Crossref]
• Messerschmidt, D. (1981) Anthropologists at Home in North America: Methods and Issues in the Study of One’s Own Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Moraga, Ch. (1981) This Bridge Called My Back. Watertown, Massachusetts: Persephone Press.
• Moraga, Ch. (1983) Cuentos: Stories By Latinas. New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.
• Narayan, K. (1993) How ‘Native’ is a Native Anthropologist. American Anthropologist, New Series, 95 (3): 671-686.[Crossref]
• Okely, J (1994) ‘Thinking through Fieldwork’ in Bryman, A and Burgess, R (eds) Analysing Qualitative Data London: Routledge.
• Okely, J. (1983) The Traveller-Gypsies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Ohnuki-Tierney, E. (1984). ‘Native’ Anthropologists. American Ethnologist, 11 (3): 584-586.[Crossref]
• Reed-Danahay, D. (ed.)(1997) Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
• Rosaldo, R. (1989) Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.
• Shahrani, M. N. (1994) Honored Guest and Marginal Man: Long-Term Field Research and Predicaments of a Native Anthropologist. In D. Fowler and D. Hardest (eds.) Others Knowing Others: Perspectives on Ethnographic Careers, pp. 15-67. London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
• Tengan, T., Ka’ili, T., & Fonoti, R. (eds.). (2010, Aug/Dec). Special Issue –Genealogies: Articulating indigenous anthropology in/of Oceania. Pacific Studies, 33 (2/3).
• Weston, K. (1991) Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Wolcott, H. (2005) The Art of Fieldwork. Rowman: Altamira.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/irsr-2012-0015