Risk Management Responses to Armed Non-State Actor Risk in Afghanistan

• Authors: Jeremy Simpson
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article considers responses by different categories of actor to the threat of armed non-state actors in the international intervention in Afghanistan 2001-2015. Concepts from the sociology of risk, in particular risk-management and the distinction between operational and reputational risk, are related to field research in Afghanistan during the intervention. The ‘risk society’ approach of Beck (2009) is critiqued as relatively inapplicable to a discussion of differences in risks to and responses by different categories of actor. The article identifies some convergences of practice across three categories of intervening actor, civil-developmental, counter-insurgent and counter-terrorist, in particular tendencies to risk-transfer and remote-management that draws together theorisation of civil practice by Duffield (2010) and military practice by Shaw (2002). This is problematised relative to difficulties in managing tensions between operational risks to intervening actors and reputational risks vis-à-vis local actors.

Keywords

EN

Armed Non-state Actors; Risk; Risk-management; Afghanistan

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: International Review of Social Research
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 156-166

Dates

published

2015-10-01

received

2014-10-01

accepted

2015-02-02

online

2015-10-30

Contributors

author

Jeremy Simpson

References

• Afghanistan NGO Safety Office (ANSO) (2007-12) ‘Country Reports’ and ‘Quarterly Data Reports’. (consulted 25/11/14).
• Atkinson, W. (2007) ‘Beck, individualization and the death of class: a critique’. British Journal of Sociology, 5(3):349-366.[Crossref]
• Bhatia, M. (2008) ‘Armed Groups in Afghanistan’. In Bhatia, M. and M. Sedra (eds.) Afghanistan, Arms and Conflict: Armed groups, disarmament and security in a post-war society, pp. 72-110. Oxon: Routledge.
• Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
• Beck, U. (2009) World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity.
• Beck, U. (2013) ‘Why ‘class’ is too soft a category to capture the explosiveness of social inequality at the beginning of the twenty-first century’. British Journal of Sociology, 64(1):63-74.[Crossref][WoS]
• Bourdieu, P. (1994) ‘Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field’. Sociological Theory, 12(1):1-18.
• Brookings/Livingston, I. and M. O’Hanlon (2010-12) ‘Afghanistan Indexes’. (consulted 01/12/14).
• Campbell, S. and G. Currie (2006) ‘Against Beck: In Defence of Risk Analysis’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(2):149-172.
• Chandrasekaran, R. (2012) Little America: The War Within the War for Afghanistan. New York: Knopf.
• Curran, D. (2013) ‘Risk society and the distribution of bads: theorizing class in the risk society’ British Journal of Sociology, 64(1):44-62.[WoS]
• Duffield, M. (2010) ‘Risk-Management and the Fortified Aid Compound: Everyday Life in Post-Interventionary Society’. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 4(4):453-474.
• Fontenot, A. and A. Maiwandi (2007) ‘Capital of Chaos: The New Kabul of Warlords and Infidels’. In Davis, M. and D. Monk (eds.) Evil Paradises: Dreamworlds of Neoliberalism, pp. 69-86. New York: New Press.
• Hastings, M. (2012) The Operators: The Wild and Terrifying Inside Story of America’s War in Afghanistan. Sydney: Penguin.
• Heng, Y. (2006) War as Risk-Management: Strategy and conflict in an age of globalised risks. New York: Routledge.
• Henriksen, R. and A. Vinci (2008) ‘Combat Motivation in Non-State Armed Groups’. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20(1):87-109.
• Hood, C. (2011) The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton: Princeton.
• Hutter, B. and M. Power, (2005) ‘Organizational encounters with risk: an introduction’. In Organizational Encounters with Risk. B. Hutter and M. Power (eds.), pp. 1-32. Cambridge: Cambridge.
• International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic (IHRCRC) and Global Justice Clinic (GJC) (2012) ‘Living Under Drones: Death, Injury and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan’. (consulted 01/12/14).
• Kilcullen, D. (2009) The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One. Oxford: Oxford.
• Kalyvas, S. (2006) The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge.
• Luhmann, N. (2002) Risk: A Sociological Theory. New Brunswick: Transaction.
• Montgomery, C. (2008) ‘Are fortification and foreign aid making Kabul more dangerous?’ (consulted 01/12/14).
• Mythen, G. (2004) Ulrich Beck: A Critical Introduction to the Risk Society. London: Pluto.
• Open Society Foundations (OSF) and The Liaison Office (TLO) (2011) ‘The Cost of Kill/Capture: Impact of the Night Raid Surge on Afghan Civilians’. (consulted 29/11/14).
• Power, M. (2004) The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty. London: Demos.
• Rasmussen, M. (2006) The Risk Society at War: Terror, Technology and Strategy in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Cambridge.
• Roxborough, I. (2012) ‘Building other People’s States: The Sociology of State-Building’. Comparative Sociology, 11(2):179-201.
• Saikal, A. (2012) Modern Afghanistan: A History of Struggle and Survival. London: I.B. Tauris.
• Schlichte, K. (2009) ‘With the State against the State? The Formation of Armed Groups’. Contemporary Security Policy, 30(2):246-264.
• Shannon, R. (2009) ‘Playing with principles in an era of securitised aid: negotiating humanitarian space in post-9/11 Afghanistan’. Progress in Development Studies, 9(1):15-36.[WoS]
• Shaw, M. (2002) ‘Risk-transfer Militarism, Small Massacres and the Historic Legitimacy of War’. International Relations, 16(3):343-359.[Crossref]
• Simpson, J. (2012) ‘The Externalisation of Risk and The Enclavisation of Intervention in Afghanistan’. In Broom, A. and L. Cheshire (eds.) Emerging and Enduring Inequalities: 2012 Refereed Conference Proceedings of The Australian Sociological Association, pp. 1-7. Brisbane: The University of Queensland/TASA.
• Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Berkley: California.[WoS]

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/irsr-2015-0015