Exploring embodied methodologies for transformative practice in early childhood and youth

• Authors: Helen Cahill , Julia Coffey , Kylie Smith
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The development of gendered identities during early childhood and youth occurs in a context of ‘body culture’ and the hyper-visibility of ‘perfect’ bodies, which align with traditional gender ideals. Embodied methods can assist to make complexity more visible, and to allow participants to see fluidity, shifts, and becoming. Whilst there has been significant theoretical development, further methodological innovations are needed to enable children and youth to articulate their perceptions of the way multiple influences shape their relations with their own bodies. Informed by ‘new materialist’ feminist theory this article will examine the work of Australian educators exploring use of creative and embodied drama-based play. The chapter advances methodologies to support pedagogical engagement with young children and youth about gender, identity and social change. The authors explore how embodied creative play can be used across ages to support children and young people to articulate the ways social norms and expectations influence their desires, imaginings, fears and actions and their perceptions of what is possible, desirable or appropriate in relation to performances of gender in their everyday worlds.

Keywords

EN

new materialism; embodiment; post-humanism; feminism; gender

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Journal of Pedagogy
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 79-92

Dates

published

2016-06-01

online

2016-08-19

Contributors

author

Helen Cahill

• University of Melbourne, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, Youth Research Centre, Australia

author

Julia Coffey

• University of Newcastle, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Australia

author

Kylie Smith

• University of Melbourne Melbourne, Graduate School of Education, Australia

References

• Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (2008). Introduction: Emerging models of materiality in feminist theory. In S. Alaimo, & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 1-19).
• Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman: John Wiley & Sons.
• Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.
• Cahill, H. (2005). Profound learning: Drama partnerships between adolescents and tertiary students. Drama Australia Journal (NJ), 29 (2), 59-72.
• Cahill, H. (2011). Drama for deconstruction. Youth Theatre Journal, 25 (1), 16-31.
• Cahill, H. (2015). Rethinking role-play for health and wellbeing: Creating a pedagogy of possibilty. In K. Wright, & J. McLeod (Eds.), Rethinking youth wellbeing: Critical perspectives (pp. 127-142). Singapore: Springer.
• Coleman, R. (2013). Sociology and the virtual: Interactive mirrors, representational thinking and intensive power. The Sociological Review, 61(1), 1-20.
• Davis, B. (2003). Frogs and snails and feminist tales. Cresskill, USA: Hampton Press, Inc.
• Edwards, R., & Fenwick, T. (2014). Critique and politics: A sociomaterialist intervention. Educational Philosophy and Theory (ahead-of-print), 1-20.
• Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2014). The research-assemblage: A new materialist approach to social inquiry. Paper presented at the BSA Annual Conference, Leeds.
• Hickey-Moody, A. (2015). Beside ourselves: Worlds beyond people. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(5), 802-813.
• Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of enquiry. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2014). “F**k Rape!”: Exploring affective intensities in a feminist research assemblage. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 772-780.
• Smith, K., Alexander, K., & D’Souza Juma, A. (2014). Gender matters in the early childhood classroom. In K. Cologon (Ed.), A Good start: Inclusion in the early years. (pp. 134-151). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Smith, K. (2013). Diversity dolls as a methodology tool for researching with children about issues of equity. International Journal of Equity and Innovation in Early Childhood. 11(1), 86-96.
• Taylor, A. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. Milton Park: Routledge.
• Taylor, C. A., & Ivinson, G. (2013). Material feminisms: New directions for education. Gender and Education, 25(6), 665-670.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/jped-2016-0005